Literature DB >> 32976808

Transient Disruption of the Inferior Parietal Lobule Impairs the Ability to Attribute Intention to Action.

Jean-François Patri1, Andrea Cavallo2, Kiri Pullar1, Marco Soriano2, Martina Valente3, Atesh Koul4, Alessio Avenanti5, Stefano Panzeri6, Cristina Becchio7.   

Abstract

Although it is well established that fronto-parietal regions are active during action observation, whether they play a causal role in the ability to infer others' intentions from visual kinematics remains undetermined. In the experiments reported here, we combined offline continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) with computational modeling to reveal and causally probe single-trial computations in the inferior parietal lobule (IPL) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Participants received cTBS over the left anterior IPL and the left IFG pars orbitalis in separate sessions before completing an intention discrimination task (discriminate intention of observed reach-to-grasp acts) or a kinematic discrimination task unrelated to intention (discriminate peak wrist height of the same acts). We targeted intention-sensitive regions whose fMRI activity, recorded when observing the same reach-to-grasp acts, could accurately discriminate intention. We found that transient disruption of activity of the left IPL, but not the IFG, impaired the observer's ability to attribute intention to action. Kinematic discrimination unrelated to intention, in contrast, was largely unaffected. Computational analyses of how encoding (mapping of intention to movement kinematics) and readout (mapping of kinematics to intention choices) intersect at the single-trial level revealed that IPL cTBS did not diminish the overall sensitivity of intention readout to movement kinematics. Rather, it selectively misaligned intention readout with respect to encoding, deteriorating mapping from informative kinematic features to intention choices. These results provide causal evidence of how the left anterior IPL computes mapping from kinematics to intentions.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action observation; cTBS; encoding; inferior frontal gyrus; inferior parietal lobule; intention; intersection; kinematics; readout; single-trial analysis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32976808      PMCID: PMC7726027          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  63 in total

1.  Decoding the neural representation of fine-grained conceptual categories.

Authors:  Marta Ghio; Matilde Maria Serena Vaghi; Daniela Perani; Marco Tettamanti
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Goal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus.

Authors:  Antonia F de C Hamilton; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Log Odds and the Interpretation of Logit Models.

Authors:  Edward C Norton; Bryan E Dowd
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Boosting and Decreasing Action Prediction Abilities Through Excitatory and Inhibitory tDCS of Inferior Frontal Cortex.

Authors:  Alessio Avenanti; Riccardo Paracampo; Laura Annella; Emmanuele Tidoni; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  More than one pathway to action understanding.

Authors:  James M Kilner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Surface-based information mapping reveals crossmodal vision-action representations in human parietal and occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Nikolaas N Oosterhof; Alison J Wiggett; Jörn Diedrichsen; Steven P Tipper; Paul E Downing
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Intentions in the brain: the unveiling of Mister Hyde.

Authors:  Caterina Ansuini; Andrea Cavallo; Cesare Bertone; Cristina Becchio
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 7.519

9.  Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system.

Authors:  Marco Iacoboni; Istvan Molnar-Szakacs; Vittorio Gallese; Giovanni Buccino; John C Mazziotta; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  The Importance of Single-Trial Analyses in Cognitive Neuroscience.

Authors:  Mark Stokes; Eelke Spaak
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  2 in total

1.  Identifying the signature of prospective motor control in children with autism.

Authors:  Andrea Cavallo; Luca Romeo; Caterina Ansuini; Francesca Battaglia; Lino Nobili; Massimiliano Pontil; Stefano Panzeri; Cristina Becchio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Intersecting kinematic encoding and readout of intention in autism.

Authors:  Noemi Montobbio; Andrea Cavallo; Dalila Albergo; Caterina Ansuini; Francesca Battaglia; Jessica Podda; Lino Nobili; Stefano Panzeri; Cristina Becchio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.