Literature DB >> 22411563

Movement kinematics affect action prediction: comparing human to non-human point-light actions.

Waltraud Stadler1, Anne Springer, Jim Parkinson, Wolfgang Prinz.   

Abstract

The influence of movement kinematics on the accuracy of predicting the time course of another individual's actions was studied. A human point-light shape was animated with human movement (natural condition) and with artificial movement that was more uniform regarding velocity profiles and trajectories (artificial condition). During brief occlusions, the participants predicted the actions in order to judge after occlusion whether the actions were continued coherently in time or shifted to an earlier or later frame. Error rates and reaction times were increased in the artificial compared to the natural condition. The findings suggest a perceptual advantage for movement with a human velocity profile, corresponding to the notion of a close interaction between observed and executed movement. The results are discussed in the framework of the simulation account and alternative interpretations are provided on the basis of correlations between the velocity profiles of natural and artificial movements with prediction performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22411563     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0431-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  52 in total

1.  Control of foot trajectory in human locomotion: role of ground contact forces in simulated reduced gravity.

Authors:  Y P Ivanenko; R Grasso; V Macellari; F Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Representing others' actions: the role of expertise in the aging mind.

Authors:  Nadine Diersch; Emily S Cross; Waltraud Stadler; Simone Schütz-Bosbach; Martina Rieger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-12-24

3.  Perception of biological motion.

Authors:  V Ahlström; R Blake; U Ahlström
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Before, during and after you disappear: aspects of timing and dynamic updating of the real-time action simulation of human motions.

Authors:  Jim Parkinson; Anne Springer; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-02-15

5.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading.

Authors:  V Gallese; A Goldman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network.

Authors:  Emily S Cross; Roman Liepelt; Antonia F de C Hamilton; Jim Parkinson; Richard Ramsey; Waltraud Stadler; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity.

Authors:  Ambra Bisio; Natale Stucchi; Marco Jacono; Luciano Fadiga; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Neural representations of kinematic laws of motion: evidence for action-perception coupling.

Authors:  Eran Dayan; Antonino Casile; Nava Levit-Binnun; Martin A Giese; Talma Hendler; Tamar Flash
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions.

Authors:  Ayse Pinar Saygin; Thierry Chaminade; Hiroshi Ishiguro; Jon Driver; Chris Frith
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.436

View more
  25 in total

1.  Simulating and predicting others' actions.

Authors:  Anne Springer; Antonia F de C Hamilton; Emily S Cross
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-06-17

2.  The effect of movement kinematics on predicting the timing of observed actions.

Authors:  Lincoln J Colling; William F Thompson; John Sutton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Action Interrupted: Processing of Movement and Breakpoints in Toddlers and Adults.

Authors:  Margaret Friend; Amy E Pace
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2015-03-31

4.  Do experts see it in slow motion? Altered timing of action simulation uncovers domain-specific perceptual processing in expert athletes.

Authors:  Carmelo M Vicario; Stergios Makris; Cosimo Urgesi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-07

5.  Interference of action perception on action production increases across the adult life span.

Authors:  Stephanie Wermelinger; Anja Gampe; Jannis Behr; Moritz M Daum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Critical Motor Involvement in Prediction of Human and Non-biological Motion Trajectories.

Authors:  Matthieu M de Wit; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.892

7.  Event-related potentials to intact and disrupted actions in children and adults.

Authors:  Amy Pace; Leslie J Carver; Margaret Friend
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2013-01-29

8.  Your move or mine? Music training and kinematic compatibility modulate synchronization with self- versus other-generated dance movement.

Authors:  Yi-Huang Su; Peter E Keller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-01-29

9.  Inferring subjective states through the observation of actions.

Authors:  D Patel; S M Fleming; J M Kilner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Action prediction in younger versus older adults: neural correlates of motor familiarity.

Authors:  Nadine Diersch; Karsten Mueller; Emily S Cross; Waltraud Stadler; Martina Rieger; Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.