Literature DB >> 26601821

Impact of Resident Involvement in Surgery (IRIS-NSQIP): Looking at the Bigger Picture Based on the American College of Surgeons-NSQIP Database.

Antoine N Saliba1, Ali T Taher1, Hani Tamim1, Afif R Harb1, Aurelie Mailhac2, Amr Radwan1, Faek R Jamali3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical residency training aims to prepare the surgical resident to become an independent practitioner of surgery. Because surgical residency training remains the sole educational channel to prepare surgeons for independent practice, our study aimed to explore the effect of resident involvement in surgery across a broad spectrum of surgical specialties to answer questions patients, surgeons, and surgical residency program directors may have concerning the effect of having residents participate in performing surgical operations. STUDY
DESIGN: This analysis used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database to establish whether patients having operations involving residents were at a risk of postoperative mortality or morbidity similar to patients having operations performed by attending surgeons alone, across a wide array of surgical procedures.
RESULTS: For operations in which residents were involved, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for mortality was 0.93 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.97), as compared with the group of patients on whom attending surgeons operated alone without any level of resident involvement. For operations in which residents were involved, the adjusted OR for morbidity was 1.02 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.04), as compared with the group of patients on whom attending surgeons operated alone without any level of resident involvement. There was a slightly statistically significantly higher risk of cardiac and respiratory morbidities in the group with any level of resident involvement as compared with the "attending alone" group.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that, across different surgical subspecialties, resident involvement in surgery is associated with comparable morbidity and lower mortality outcomes. This provides a reassuring answer to patients, attending surgeons, and surgical program directors.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26601821     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  12 in total

1.  Impact of Fellow Versus Resident Assistance on Outcomes Following Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Rosalie A Carr; Catherine W Chung; Christian M Schmidt; Andrea Jester; Molly E Kilbane; Michael G House; Nicholas J Zyromski; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Eugene P Ceppa
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  [Work-life balance : Thoughts of the Young Surgeon representatives of the German Surgical Society].

Authors:  B J Braun; T Fritz; B Lutz; A Röth; S Anetsberger; P Kokemohr; R Luketina
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  [Transparent operative training in visceral surgery : Analysis at a German university medical center].

Authors:  W Kneist; T Huber; M Paschold; F Bartsch; M Herzer; H Lang
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  The impact of teaching on the duration of common urological operations.

Authors:  Blayne Welk; Jennifer Winick-Ng; Andrew McClure; Chris Vinden; Sumit Dave; Stephen Pautler
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Outcomes of minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy with resident operative involvement.

Authors:  Emily A Slopnick; Adonis K Hijaz; J Welles Henderson; Sangeeta T Mahajan; Carvell T Nguyen; Simon P Kim
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  The Presence of an Advanced Gastrointestinal (GI)/Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Fellowship Program Does Not Impact Short-Term Patient Outcomes Following Fundoplication or Esophagomyotomy.

Authors:  Donald K Groves; Maria S Altieri; Brianne Sullivan; Jie Yang; Mark A Talamini; Aurora D Pryor
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Surgeon, not technique, defines outcomes after central venous port insertion.

Authors:  Audrey E Ertel; Zachary D McHenry; Vijay K Venkatesan; Dennis J Hanseman; Koffi Wima; Richard S Hoehn; Shimul A Shah; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Trainee-associated outcomes in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: propensity score analysis accounting for operative time, procedure complexity and patient comorbidity.

Authors:  Kevin R Kasten; Adam C Celio; Lauren Trakimas; Mark L Manwaring; Konstantinos Spaniolas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Complications and Readmissions Associated with First Assistant Training Level Following Elective Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Tarik K Yuce; Amy Holmstrom; Nathaniel J Soper; Alexander P Nagle; Eric S Hungness; Ryan P Merkow; Ezra N Teitelbaum
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Patient Blood Management improves outcome in oncologic surgery.

Authors:  Vivienne Keding; Kai Zacharowski; Wolf O Bechstein; Patrick Meybohm; Andreas A Schnitzbauer
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.