Literature DB >> 22364902

Does resident involvement effect surgical times and complication rates during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis? An analysis of 16,849 cases from the ACS-NSQIP.

Vriti Advani1, Sajida Ahad, Chad Gonczy, Steven Markwell, Imran Hassan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding whether resident involvement during surgery impacts patient outcomes. We compared surgical times and perioperative complications of patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy with and without residents.
METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis during 2005 to 2008 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
RESULTS: During the study period, 16,849 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis (residents participated in 68% of procedures). There were no statistical and/or clinically meaningful differences between median age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology score, and morbidity probability between the 2 groups, suggesting that case mix was not a significant confounder. Patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy with residents compared with patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy without residents had a higher incidence of serious and overall morbidity and longer surgical times. However, surgical times and complications were similar between residents in postgraduate years 1 to 5.
CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the postgraduate year level, resident involvement resulted in a clinically appreciable increase in surgical times and a statistically significant increase in certain complications.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22364902     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  34 in total

1.  Resident participation in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparison of outcomes from the ACS-NSQIP database.

Authors:  Laura Doyon; Alejandro Moreno-Koehler; Rocco Ricciardi; Dmitry Nepomnayshy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  [Appendectomy in surgical residency. What has changed over the past 10 years?].

Authors:  T Huber; M Paschold; F Bartsch; H Lang; W Kneist
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Impact of Fellow Versus Resident Assistance on Outcomes Following Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Rosalie A Carr; Catherine W Chung; Christian M Schmidt; Andrea Jester; Molly E Kilbane; Michael G House; Nicholas J Zyromski; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Eugene P Ceppa
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  The impact of resident involvement on surgical outcomes among patients undergoing hepatic and pancreatic resections.

Authors:  Aslam Ejaz; Gaya Spolverato; Yuhree Kim; Christopher L Wolfgang; Kenzo Hirose; Matthew Weiss; Martin A Makary; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Resident involvement and experience do not affect perioperative complications following robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Daniel T McMillan; Anthony J Viera; Jonathan Matthews; Mathew C Raynor; Michael E Woods; Raj S Pruthi; Eric M Wallen; Matthew E Nielsen; Angela B Smith
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  The impact of resident involvement in minimally-invasive urologic oncology procedures.

Authors:  Nedim Ruhotina; Julien Dagenais; Giorgio Gandaglia; Akshay Sood; Firas Abdollah; Steven L Chang; Jeffrey J Leow; Kola Olugbade; Arun Rai; Jesse D Sammon; Marianne Schmid; Briony Varda; Kevin C Zorn; Mani Menon; Adam S Kibel; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Surgical trainee impact on bariatric surgery safety.

Authors:  Iliya Goldberg; Jie Yang; Jihye Park; Aurora D Pryor; Salvatore Docimo; Andrew T Bates; Mark A Talamini; Konstantinos Spaniolas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  National outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy: operative complications and risk factors for adverse events.

Authors:  Samuel W Ross; Bindhu Oommen; Blair A Wormer; Amanda L Walters; Brent D Matthews; B T Heniford; Vedra A Augenstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The effect of resident participation on short-term outcomes after orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Andrew J Pugely; Yubo Gao; Christopher T Martin; John J Callagh; Stuart L Weinstein; J Lawrence Marsh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Resident participation is not associated with postoperative adverse events, reoperation, or prolonged length of stay following craniotomy for brain tumor resection.

Authors:  Nikita Lakomkin; Constantinos G Hadjipanayis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.