Robert W Krell1, Nancy J O Birkmeyer2, Bradley N Reames2, Arthur M Carlin3, John D Birkmeyer2, Jonathan F Finks2. 1. Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: rkrell@med.umich.edu. 2. Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI. 3. Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although resident involvement has been shown to be safe for most procedures, the impact of residents on outcomes after complex laparoscopic procedures is not well understood. We sought to examine the impact of resident involvement on outcomes after bariatric surgery using a population-based clinical registry. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed 17,057 patients who underwent a primary laparoscopic gastric bypass in the 35-hospital Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative from July 2006 to August 2012. Resident involvement was characterized at the surgeon level. Using hierarchical logistic regression, we examined the influence of resident involvement on 30-day complications, accounting for patient characteristics as well as hospital and surgeon case volume. To evaluate potential mediating factors for specific complications, we also adjusted for operative duration. RESULTS: Risk-adjusted 30-day complication rates with and without residents were 13.0% and 8.5%, respectively (p < 0.01). Resident involvement was independently associated with wound infection (odds ratio [OR] = 2.06; 95% CI, 1.24-3.43) and venous thromboembolism (OR = 2.01; 95% CI, 1.19-3.40), but not with any other medical or surgical complications. Operative duration was longer with resident involvement (median duration with residents 129 minutes vs 88 minutes without; p < 0.01). After adjusting for operative duration, resident involvement was still independently associated with wound infection (OR = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.01-2.76), but not venous thromboembolism (OR = 1.73; 95% CI, 0.99-3.04). CONCLUSIONS: Resident involvement in laparoscopic gastric bypass is independently associated with wound infections and venous thromboembolism. The effect appears to be mediated in part by longer operative times. These findings highlight the importance of strategies to assess and improve resident technical proficiency outside the operating room.
BACKGROUND: Although resident involvement has been shown to be safe for most procedures, the impact of residents on outcomes after complex laparoscopic procedures is not well understood. We sought to examine the impact of resident involvement on outcomes after bariatric surgery using a population-based clinical registry. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed 17,057 patients who underwent a primary laparoscopic gastric bypass in the 35-hospital Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative from July 2006 to August 2012. Resident involvement was characterized at the surgeon level. Using hierarchical logistic regression, we examined the influence of resident involvement on 30-day complications, accounting for patient characteristics as well as hospital and surgeon case volume. To evaluate potential mediating factors for specific complications, we also adjusted for operative duration. RESULTS: Risk-adjusted 30-day complication rates with and without residents were 13.0% and 8.5%, respectively (p < 0.01). Resident involvement was independently associated with wound infection (odds ratio [OR] = 2.06; 95% CI, 1.24-3.43) and venous thromboembolism (OR = 2.01; 95% CI, 1.19-3.40), but not with any other medical or surgical complications. Operative duration was longer with resident involvement (median duration with residents 129 minutes vs 88 minutes without; p < 0.01). After adjusting for operative duration, resident involvement was still independently associated with wound infection (OR = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.01-2.76), but not venous thromboembolism (OR = 1.73; 95% CI, 0.99-3.04). CONCLUSIONS: Resident involvement in laparoscopic gastric bypass is independently associated with wound infections and venous thromboembolism. The effect appears to be mediated in part by longer operative times. These findings highlight the importance of strategies to assess and improve resident technical proficiency outside the operating room.
Authors: Gloria P Hsu; John M Morton; Li Jin; Bassem Y Safadi; Thomas S Satterwhite; Myriam J Curet Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: S F Khuri; S F Najjar; J Daley; B Krasnicka; M Hossain; W G Henderson; J B Aust; B Bass; M J Bishop; J Demakis; R DePalma; P J Fabri; A Fink; J Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G McDonald; L Neumayer; R H Roswell; J Spencer; R H Turnage Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Kamal M F Itani; Ralph G DePalma; Tracy Schifftner; Karen M Sanders; Barbara K Chang; William G Henderson; Shukri F Khuri Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Justin B Dimick; David Share; Abdelkader Hawasli; Wayne J English; Jeffrey Genaw; Jonathan F Finks; Arthur M Carlin; John D Birkmeyer Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-07-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Rosalie A Carr; Catherine W Chung; Christian M Schmidt; Andrea Jester; Molly E Kilbane; Michael G House; Nicholas J Zyromski; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Eugene P Ceppa Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Bradley N Reames; Daniel Bacal; Robert W Krell; John D Birkmeyer; Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Jonathan F Finks Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Iliya Goldberg; Jie Yang; Jihye Park; Aurora D Pryor; Salvatore Docimo; Andrew T Bates; Mark A Talamini; Konstantinos Spaniolas Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Ammara A Watkins; Lindsay A Bliss; Danielle B Cameron; Mariam F Eskander; Jennifer F Tseng; Tara S Kent Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Anne O Lidor; Erin Moran-Atkin; Miloslawa Stem; Thomas H Magnuson; Kimberley E Steele; Richard Feinberg; Michael A Schweitzer Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 4.584