Literature DB >> 28194555

Nonlinear mixed-effects models for pharmacokinetic data analysis: assessment of the random-effects distribution.

Reza Drikvandi1.   

Abstract

Nonlinear mixed-effects models are frequently used for pharmacokinetic data analysis, and they account for inter-subject variability in pharmacokinetic parameters by incorporating subject-specific random effects into the model. The random effects are often assumed to follow a (multivariate) normal distribution. However, many articles have shown that misspecifying the random-effects distribution can introduce bias in the estimates of parameters and affect inferences about the random effects themselves, such as estimation of the inter-subject variability. Because random effects are unobservable latent variables, it is difficult to assess their distribution. In a recent paper we developed a diagnostic tool based on the so-called gradient function to assess the random-effects distribution in mixed models. There we evaluated the gradient function for generalized liner mixed models and in the presence of a single random effect. However, assessing the random-effects distribution in nonlinear mixed-effects models is more challenging, especially when multiple random effects are present, and therefore the results from linear and generalized linear mixed models may not be valid for such nonlinear models. In this paper, we further investigate the gradient function and evaluate its performance for such nonlinear mixed-effects models which are common in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. We use simulations as well as real data from an intensive pharmacokinetic study to illustrate the proposed diagnostic tool.

Keywords:  Diagnostic tool; Gradient function; Nonlinear mixed-effects models; Pharmacokinetic data; Random effects

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28194555     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-017-9510-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  9 in total

1.  Prediction discrepancies for the evaluation of nonlinear mixed-effects models.

Authors:  France Mentré; Sylvie Escolano
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2005-11-13       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Goodness-of-fit methods for generalized linear mixed models.

Authors:  Zhiying Pan; D Y Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The impact of a misspecified random-effects distribution on the estimation and the performance of inferential procedures in generalized linear mixed models.

Authors:  S Litière; A Alonso; G Molenberghs
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-20       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Type I and Type II error under random-effects misspecification in generalized linear mixed models.

Authors:  Saskia Litière; Ariel Alonso; Geert Molenberghs
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Diagnosis of random-effect model misspecification in generalized linear mixed models for binary response.

Authors:  Xianzheng Huang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  A goodness-of-fit test for the random-effects distribution in mixed models.

Authors:  Achmad Efendi; Reza Drikvandi; Geert Verbeke; Geert Molenberghs
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  The gradient function as an exploratory goodness-of-fit assessment of the random-effects distribution in mixed models.

Authors:  Geert Verbeke; Geert Molenberghs
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 5.899

8.  Diagnosing misspecification of the random-effects distribution in mixed models.

Authors:  Reza Drikvandi; Geert Verbeke; Geert Molenberghs
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Empirical Bayes estimation of individual growth-curve parameters and their relationship to covariates.

Authors:  J F Strenio; H I Weisberg; A S Bryk
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.571

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Novel methods for the analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Lee Kennedy-Shaffer; Victor de Gruttola; Marc Lipsitch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Population Pharmacodynamic Analyses of Human Anti-Rabies Virus Monoclonal Antibody (Ormutivimab) in Healthy Adult Subjects.

Authors:  Junnan Zhang; Nianmin Shi; Guohua Li; Li Li; Yunhua Bai; Liqing Yang; Weimin Zhao; Jian Gao; Jingshuang Wei; Wei Zhao; Lili Zhai; Peiyuan Huo; Lemin Ren; Lan Yu; Yufeng Li
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.