Literature DB >> 16401273

Goodness-of-fit methods for generalized linear mixed models.

Zhiying Pan1, D Y Lin.   

Abstract

We develop graphical and numerical methods for checking the adequacy of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs). These methods are based on the cumulative sums of residuals over covariates or predicted values of the response variable. Under the assumed model, the asymptotic distributions of these stochastic processes can be approximated by certain zero-mean Gaussian processes, whose realizations can be generated through Monte Carlo simulation. Each observed process can then be compared, both visually and analytically, to a number of realizations simulated from the null distribution. These comparisons enable one to assess objectively whether the observed residual patterns reflect model misspecification or random variation. The proposed methods are particularly useful for checking the functional form of a covariate or the link function. Extensive simulation studies show that the proposed goodness-of-fit tests have proper sizes and are sensitive to model misspecification. Applications to two medical studies lead to improved models.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16401273     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00365.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  16 in total

1.  Testing polynomial covariate effects in linear and generalized linear mixed models.

Authors:  Mingyan Huang; Daowen Zhang
Journal:  Stat Surv       Date:  2008-01-01

2.  Nonlinear mixed-effects models for pharmacokinetic data analysis: assessment of the random-effects distribution.

Authors:  Reza Drikvandi
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Goodness of Fit Tests for Linear Mixed Models.

Authors:  Min Tang; Eric V Slud; Ruth M Pfeiffer
Journal:  J Multivar Anal       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 1.473

4.  A discrete-time survival model with random effects for designing and analyzing repeated low-dose challenge experiments.

Authors:  Chaeryon Kang; Ying Huang; Christopher J Miller
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  NONPARAMETRIC INFERENCE FOR MARKOV PROCESSES WITH MISSING ABSORBING STATE.

Authors:  Giorgos Bakoyannis; Ying Zhang; Constantin T Yiannoutsos
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.261

6.  Commentary: On Effect Measures, Heterogeneity, and the Laws of Nature.

Authors:  Orestis A Panagiotou; Thomas A Trikalinos
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Test the reliability of doubly robust estimation with missing response data.

Authors:  Baojiang Chen; Jing Qin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Lung protective ventilation (ARDSNet) versus airway pressure release ventilation: ventilatory management in a combined model of acute lung and brain injury.

Authors:  Stephen W Davies; Kenji L Leonard; Randall K Falls; Ronald P Mageau; Jimmy T Efird; Joseph P Hollowell; Wayne E Trainor; Hilal A Kanaan; Robert C Hickner; Robert G Sawyer; Nathaniel R Poulin; Brett H Waibel; Eric A Toschlog
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.313

9.  Spatial cluster detection for weighted outcomes using cumulative geographic residuals.

Authors:  Andrea J Cook; Yi Li; David Arterburn; Ram C Tiwari
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  In vitro degradation and fermentation of three dietary fiber sources by human colonic bacteria.

Authors:  Donna Z Bliss; Paul J Weimer; Hans-Joachim G Jung; Kay Savik
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 5.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.