Literature DB >> 27377556

Diagnosing misspecification of the random-effects distribution in mixed models.

Reza Drikvandi1,2, Geert Verbeke1,3, Geert Molenberghs1,3.   

Abstract

It is traditionally assumed that the random effects in mixed models follow a multivariate normal distribution, making likelihood-based inferences more feasible theoretically and computationally. However, this assumption does not necessarily hold in practice which may lead to biased and unreliable results. We introduce a novel diagnostic test based on the so-called gradient function proposed by Verbeke and Molenberghs (2013) to assess the random-effects distribution. We establish asymptotic properties of our test and show that, under a correctly specified model, the proposed test statistic converges to a weighted sum of independent chi-squared random variables each with one degree of freedom. The weights, which are eigenvalues of a square matrix, can be easily calculated. We also develop a parametric bootstrap algorithm for small samples. Our strategy can be used to check the adequacy of any distribution for random effects in a wide class of mixed models, including linear mixed models, generalized linear mixed models, and non-linear mixed models, with univariate as well as multivariate random effects. Both asymptotic and bootstrap proposals are evaluated via simulations and a real data analysis of a randomized multicenter study on toenail dermatophyte onychomycosis.
© 2016, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asymptotic distribution; Eigenvalues; Gradient function; Longitudinal data; Parametric bootstrap; Random effects

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27377556     DOI: 10.1111/biom.12551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  7 in total

1.  Nonlinear mixed-effects models for pharmacokinetic data analysis: assessment of the random-effects distribution.

Authors:  Reza Drikvandi
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  The effect of random-effects misspecification on classification accuracy.

Authors:  Riham El Saeiti; Marta García-Fiñana; David M Hughes
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 1.829

3.  A statistical model for the dynamics of COVID-19 infections and their case detection ratio in 2020.

Authors:  Marc Schneble; Giacomo De Nicola; Göran Kauermann; Ursula Berger
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 1.715

4.  Comparison of empirical and dynamic models for HIV viral load rebound after treatment interruption.

Authors:  Ante Bing; Yuchen Hu; Melanie Prague; Alison L Hill; Jonathan Z Li; Ronald J Bosch; Victor De Gruttola; Rui Wang
Journal:  Stat Commun Infect Dis       Date:  2020-08-21

5.  A graphical approach to assess the goodness-of-fit of random-effects linear models when the goal is to measure individual benefits of medical treatments in severely ill patients.

Authors:  Zhiwen Wang; Francisco J Diaz
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Pitfalls of using the risk ratio in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilyas Bakbergenuly; David C Hoaglin; Elena Kulinskaya
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 5.273

7.  MEGH: A parametric class of general hazard models for clustered survival data.

Authors:  Francisco Javier Rubio; Reza Drikvandi
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 2.494

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.