Literature DB >> 18759837

Diagnosis of random-effect model misspecification in generalized linear mixed models for binary response.

Xianzheng Huang1.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) are widely used in the analysis of clustered data. However, the validity of likelihood-based inference in such analyses can be greatly affected by the assumed model for the random effects. We propose a diagnostic method for random-effect model misspecification in GLMMs for clustered binary response. We provide a theoretical justification of the proposed method and investigate its finite sample performance via simulation. The proposed method is applied to data from a longitudinal respiratory infection study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18759837     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01103.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  6 in total

1.  Novel methods for the analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Lee Kennedy-Shaffer; Victor de Gruttola; Marc Lipsitch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Nonlinear mixed-effects models for pharmacokinetic data analysis: assessment of the random-effects distribution.

Authors:  Reza Drikvandi
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Enhanced Method for Diagnosing Pharmacometric Models: Random Sampling from Conditional Distributions.

Authors:  Marc Lavielle; Benjamin Ribba
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 2-Analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Melanie Prague; John A Gallis; Fan Li; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Regression analysis for multiple-disease group testing data.

Authors:  Boan Zhang; Christopher R Bilder; Joshua M Tebbs
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Two-part models for repeatedly measured ordinal data with "don't know" category.

Authors:  Ralitza Gueorguieva; Eugenia Buta; Meghan Morean; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.373

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.