| Literature DB >> 29176963 |
Jianming Wang1, Tianhan Zhang1, Liping Li2, Jingwen Li1, Yiming Feng3, Qi Lu3.
Abstract
Dryland ecosystems cover more than 30% of the terrestrial area of China, while processes that shape the biogeographic patterns of bacterial and fungal β-diversity have rarely been evaluated synchronously. To compare the biogeographic patterns and its drivers of bacterial and fungal β-diversity, we collected 62 soil samples from a typical dryland region of northwest China. We assessed bacterial and fungal communities by sequencing bacterial 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS data. Meanwhile, the β-diversity was decomposed into two components: species replacement (species turnover) and nestedness to further explore the bacterial and fungal β-diversity patterns and its causes. The results show that both bacterial and fungal β-diversity were derived almost entirely from species turnover rather than from species nestedness. Distance-decay relationships confirmed that the geographic patterns of bacterial and fungal β-diversity were significantly different. Environmental factors had the dominant influence on both the bacterial and fungal β-diversity and species turnover, however, the role of geographic distance varied across bacterial and fungal communities. Furthermore, both bacterial and fungal nestedness did not significantly respond to the environmental and geographic distance. Our findings suggest that the different response of bacterial and fungal species turnover to dispersal limitation and other, unknown processes may result in different biogeographic patterns of bacterial and fungal β-diversity in the drylands of northwest China. Together, we highlight that the drivers of β-diversity patterns vary between bacterial and fungal communities, and microbial β-diversity are driven by multiple factors in the drylands of northwest China.Entities:
Keywords: bacteria; community ecology; dispersal limitation; dryland; environmental selection; fungi; soil microbes; β-diversity
Year: 2017 PMID: 29176963 PMCID: PMC5686094 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between dominant bacterial taxa and environmental variables.
| TW | TSN | TSP | TOC | AN | pH | CN | NP | AI | Altitude | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actinobacteria | -0.34** | -0.11 | 0.14 | -0.13 | -0.29* | 0.31* | -0.22 | -0.14 | -0.03 | -0.25* |
| Proteobacteria | -0.08 | -0.01 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.15 | -0.05 | 0.23 | -0.02 | -0.17 | -0.07 |
| Chloroflexi | -0.28* | -0.28* | 0.14 | -0.25 | -0.34** | 0.302* | -0.09 | -0.32* | -0.21 | -0.11 |
| Acidobacteria | 0.50** | 0.61** | 0.05 | 0.66** | 0.36** | -0.55** | 0.19 | 0.64** | 0.57** | 0.57** |
| Firmicutes | -0.03 | -0.16 | -0.29* | -0.21 | 0.11 | -0.01 | 0.03 | -0.13 | -0.22 | -0.09 |
| Gemmatimonadetes | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.2 | -0.11 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.23 |
| Bacteroidetes | 0.18 | -0.06 | -0.08 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.28* | -0.02 | -0.11 | 0.03 |
| Verrucomicrobia | 0.45** | 0.54** | 0.03 | 0.60** | 0.26* | -0.38** | 0.09 | 0.58** | 0.66** | 0.38** |
| Cyanobacteria | 0.16 | 0.26* | -0.12 | 0.31* | 0.22 | -0.19 | 0.07 | 0.30* | 0.17 | 0.28* |
| Planctomycetes | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.17 | -0.01 | -0.05 | -0.01 | 0.15 | 0.21 | -0.02 |
| Deinococcus-Thermus | -0.55** | -0.67** | -0.11 | -0.68** | -0.36** | 0.64** | -0.14 | -0.64** | -0.57** | -0.59** |
Spearman’s rank correlation between dominant fungal taxa and environmental variables.
| TW | TSN | TSP | TOC | AN | pH | CN | NP | AI | Altitude | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ascomycota | -0.38** | -0.22 | -0.09 | -0.23 | 0.03 | 0.2 | -0.13 | -0.18 | -0.16 | -0.47** |
| Basidiomycota | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.22 | 0.07 | -0.15 | 0.03 | 0.11 | -0.01 | 0.08 | 0.28* |
| Unidentified | 0.13 | -0.04 | -0.12 | -0.09 | -0.31* | 0.19 | -0.14 | -0.02 | -0.07 | 0.05 |
| Zygomycota | 0.68** | 0.72** | 0.04 | 0.77** | 0.45** | -0.49** | 0.15 | 0.73** | 0.53** | 0.61** |
| Glomeromycota | 0.41** | 0.61** | 0.09 | 0.56** | 0.22 | -0.27* | -0.19 | 0.60** | 0.56** | 0.36** |
| Chytridiomycota | -0.01 | -0.04 | 0.09 | -0.01 | -0.13 | -0.06 | -0.07 | -0.03 | -0.06 | -0.21 |
| Incertae sedis | -0.30* | -0.53** | -0.26* | -0.54** | -0.44** | 0.47** | 0.03 | -0.50** | -0.59** | -0.34** |
The environmental variables that were significantly correlated with bacterial and fungal community structure.
| Bacteria | Fungi | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TW | ||||
| TSP | 0.253 | 0.164 | ||
| TSN | ||||
| NP | 0.292 | 0.383 | ||
| CN | 0.251 | 0.281 | ||
| TOC | ||||
| AN | 0.216 | 0.257 | ||
| pH | ||||
| AI | ||||
| Altitude | 0.241 | 0.291 | ||
Summary statistics of the bacterial and fungal β-diversity, as measured with the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity (dBC) and its replacement (dBC-bal) and nestedness (dBC-gra) component.
| Bacteria | fungi | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dBC | dBC-bal | dBC-gra | dBC | dBC-bal | dBC-gra | |
| Mean value | 0.545 | 0.517 | 0.028 | 0.757 | 0.725 | 0.032 |
| Relative contribution (%) | 94.862 | 5.416 | 95.773 | 4.414 | ||
The relationship between community dissimilarity and the environmental distance or geographic distance using Mantel and partial Mantel tests.
| Effects of | Controlling for | Bacteria | Fungi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dBC | dBC-bal | dBC-gra | dBC | dBC-bal | dBC-gra | ||
| Environmental distance | 0.636*** | 0.628*** | -0.091NS | 0.621*** | 0.552*** | 0.032NS | |
| Geographic distance | 0.221*** | 0.209*** | 0.027NS | 0.428*** | 0.415*** | -0.032NS | |
| Environmental distance | Geographic distance | 0.612*** | 0.606*** | -0.104NS | 0.568*** | 0.489*** | 0.045NS |
| Geographic distance | Environmental distance | 0.058NS | -0.041NS | ||||
Results of the multiple regression analysis on matrices analysis (MRM) for bacterial and fungal communities.
| Bacteria | Fungi | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β-diversity | Replacement | β-diversity | Replacement | |
| Ln (Geographic distance (km)) | ||||
| SM | ||||
| TSP | 0.015* | 0.015* | ||
| TOC | 0.018** | |||
| AN | ||||
| pH | 0.016** | 0.009* | ||
| CN | 0.029*** | 0.029** | 0.017** | 0.018** |
| AI | 0.028** | 0.029*** | ||
| Altitude | ||||