Arvin B Kheterpal1, Katherine M Bunnell1, Jad S Husseini1, Connie Y Chang1, Scott D Martin2, Adam C Zoga3, Miriam A Bredella4. 1. Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Yawkey 6E, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. 2. Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 175 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. 3. Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, 132 South 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Yawkey 6E, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. mbredella@mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the value of anesthetic injection during hip MR arthrography (anesthetic MRA) to differentiate between intra- and extra-articular pathology in patients with hip pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was IRB-approved and HIPAA-compliant. We included 75 consecutive adult patients (46 women, mean age 38 ± 13 years) who were referred for MRA. All patients underwent a focused hip examination including active flexion, passive flexion, and passive flexion with internal and external rotation, immediately prior to injection. Anesthetic MRA was performed following fluoroscopically guided intra-articular injection of contrast mixed with anesthetic. Following the injection, the hip examination was repeated, and the pain response was recorded. Clinical records, including response to corticosteroid injections, physical therapy notes, and operative reports were reviewed for verification of intra- and extra-articular pathology as the source of hip pain (gold standard). The positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPP) of anesthetic MRA to differentiate between intra- and extra-articular pathology were calculated. RESULTS: On MRI, 41 patients had only intra-articular and 5 patients only extra-articular pathology, while 29 patients had both, intra- and extra-articular pathology. Forty-three patients had pain relief and 32 patients had no pain relief after anesthetic injection. PPV of anesthetic MRA to detect intra-articular pathology was 91% and NPV was 67%. CONCLUSION: Anesthetic MRA can be used as an adjunct to define the origin of hip pain. A positive response suggests intra-articular pathology which can be helpful to localize the source of pain in equivocal cases where both intra- and extra-articular pathology are evident on MRI.
PURPOSE: To determine the value of anesthetic injection during hip MR arthrography (anesthetic MRA) to differentiate between intra- and extra-articular pathology in patients with hip pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was IRB-approved and HIPAA-compliant. We included 75 consecutive adult patients (46 women, mean age 38 ± 13 years) who were referred for MRA. All patients underwent a focused hip examination including active flexion, passive flexion, and passive flexion with internal and external rotation, immediately prior to injection. Anesthetic MRA was performed following fluoroscopically guided intra-articular injection of contrast mixed with anesthetic. Following the injection, the hip examination was repeated, and the pain response was recorded. Clinical records, including response to corticosteroid injections, physical therapy notes, and operative reports were reviewed for verification of intra- and extra-articular pathology as the source of hip pain (gold standard). The positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPP) of anesthetic MRA to differentiate between intra- and extra-articular pathology were calculated. RESULTS: On MRI, 41 patients had only intra-articular and 5 patients only extra-articular pathology, while 29 patients had both, intra- and extra-articular pathology. Forty-three patients had pain relief and 32 patients had no pain relief after anesthetic injection. PPV of anesthetic MRA to detect intra-articular pathology was 91% and NPV was 67%. CONCLUSION: Anesthetic MRA can be used as an adjunct to define the origin of hip pain. A positive response suggests intra-articular pathology which can be helpful to localize the source of pain in equivocal cases where both intra- and extra-articular pathology are evident on MRI.
Authors: Robroy L Martin; Bryan T Kelly; Michael Leunig; Hal D Martin; Nicholas G Mohtadi; Marc J Philippon; Jon K Sekiya; Marc R Safran Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2010-01-08 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Michael B Gerhardt; Alex A Romero; Holly Jacinda Silvers; David J Harris; Diane Watanabe; Bert R Mandelbaum Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Tarek M Hegazi; Jeffrey A Belair; Eoghan J McCarthy; Johannes B Roedl; William B Morrison Journal: Radiographics Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Brad Register; Andrew T Pennock; Charles P Ho; Colin D Strickland; Ashur Lawand; Marc J Philippon Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 6.202