Literature DB >> 28185285

US Military Service Members' Reasons for Deciding to Participate in Health Research.

Wendy A Cook1, Kristal C Melvin2, Ardith Z Doorenbos3.   

Abstract

Researchers have reported challenges in recruiting US military service members as research participants. We explored their reasons for participating. Eighteen US military service members who had participated in at least one health-related research study within the previous 3 years completed semi-structured individual interviews in person or by telephone, focused on the service members' past decisions regarding research participation. Service members described participation decisions for 34 individual research experiences in 27 separate studies. Service members' reasons for participation in research clustered in three themes: others-, self-, and fit-focused. Each decision included reasons characterized by at least two themes. Reasons from all three themes were apparent in two-thirds of individual participation decisions. Reasons described by at least half of the service members included a desire to make things better for others, to improve an organization, to help researchers, and to improve one's health; understanding how they fit in studies; and convenience of participation. Findings may help researchers, study sponsors, ethicists, military leaders, and military decision-makers better understand service members' reasons for participating in research and improve future recruitment of service members in health research.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  altruism; decision-making; military personnel; qualitative description; recruitment and retention; research ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28185285      PMCID: PMC5540640          DOI: 10.1002/nur.21785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  23 in total

1.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

Review 2.  Recruitment and attrition issues in military clinical trials and health research studies.

Authors:  Nigel E Bush; Sean C Sheppard; Emily Fantelli; Kathleen R Bell; Mark A Reger
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Sample size in qualitative research.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  An investigation of patients' motivations for their participation in genetics-related research.

Authors:  N Hallowell; S Cooke; G Crawford; A Lucassen; M Parker; C Snowdon
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Epidemiologic approaches to veterans' health.

Authors:  J Michael Gaziano; John Concato; Sandro Galea; Nicholas L Smith; Dawn Provenzale
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Key Stakeholders' Perceptions of Motivators for Research Participation Among Individuals Who Are Incarcerated.

Authors:  Bridget L Hanson; Sherilyn A Faulkner; Christiane Brems; Staci L Corey; Gloria D Eldridge; Mark E Johnson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Reasons for participating in randomised controlled trials: conditional altruism and considerations for self.

Authors:  Sharon K McCann; Marion K Campbell; Vikki A Entwistle
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 8.  Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hyejin Kim; Justine S Sefcik; Christine Bradway
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 2.228

9.  Research on U.S. Military Women: Recruitment and Retention Challenges and Strategies.

Authors:  Lisa A Braun; Holly P Kennedy; Lois S Sadler; Jane Dixon
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Accessing health services through the back door: a qualitative interview study investigating reasons why people participate in health research in Canada.

Authors:  Anne Townsend; Susan M Cox
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  1 in total

1.  Public views regarding the responsibility of patients, clinicians, and institutions to participate in research in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin P Weinfurt; Li Lin; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.486

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.