Literature DB >> 31256635

Public views regarding the responsibility of patients, clinicians, and institutions to participate in research in the United States.

Kevin P Weinfurt1, Li Lin1, Jeremy Sugarman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The need for more and better evidence to inform clinical decision making among all stakeholders has fueled calls for creating learning healthcare systems. The successful realization of a learning healthcare system seems to assume that various parties have a responsibility to participate in learning activities, including research. The objective of this study was to determine whether members of the general public perceive an ethical responsibility to participate in pragmatic clinical research that would be inherent to a learning health system.
METHODS: A total of 2994 English-speaking adults completed a nationally representative online survey.
RESULTS: About two-thirds of respondents were relatively neutral regarding a responsibility for themselves and others to participate in research; the remainder felt that they and others did not have a responsibility to participate in research.
CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to justify and develop a robust learning health system in an ethically acceptable fashion need to take these findings into account.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Learning healthcare systems; pragmatic clinical research; research participation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31256635      PMCID: PMC6904505          DOI: 10.1177/1740774519858917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  14 in total

1.  Development of a revised Health Care System Distrust scale.

Authors:  Judy A Shea; Ellyn Micco; Lorraine T Dean; Suzanne McMurphy; J Sanford Schwartz; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  US Military Service Members' Reasons for Deciding to Participate in Health Research.

Authors:  Wendy A Cook; Kristal C Melvin; Ardith Z Doorenbos
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  How do patients feel about taking part in clinical trials in emergency care?

Authors:  Joseph M Buckley; Andy D Irving; Steve Goodacre
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Informed consent, comparative effectiveness, and learning health care.

Authors:  Ruth R Faden; Tom L Beauchamp; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Measuring trust in medical researchers.

Authors:  Mark A Hall; Fabian Camacho; Janice S Lawlor; Venita Depuy; Jeremy Sugarman; Kevin Weinfurt
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Ethical aspects of clinical trials: the attitudes of the public and out-patients.

Authors:  S Madsen; S Holm; P Riis
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Comparison of Approaches for Notification and Authorization in Pragmatic Clinical Research Evaluating Commonly Used Medical Practices.

Authors:  Kevin P Weinfurt; Juli M Bollinger; Kathleen M Brelsford; Martina Bresciani; Zachary Lampron; Li Lin; Rachel J Topazian; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Hope for a cure and altruism are the main motives behind participation in phase 3 clinical cancer trials.

Authors:  T Godskesen; M G Hansson; P Nygren; K Nordin; U Kihlbom
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.520

9.  Development of abbreviated measures to assess patient trust in a physician, a health insurer, and the medical profession.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dugan; Felicia Trachtenberg; Mark A Hall
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  A Survey of U.S Adults' Opinions about Conduct of a Nationwide Precision Medicine Initiative® Cohort Study of Genes and Environment.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Rebecca Baker; Lauren C Milner; Stephanie Devaney; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Public attitudes toward an authorization for contact program for clinical research.

Authors:  Nyiramugisha K Niyibizi; Candace D Speight; Charlie Gregor; Yi-An Ko; Stephanie A Kraft; Andrea R Mitchell; Bradley G Phillips; Kathryn M Porter; Seema K Shah; Jeremy Sugarman; Benjamin S Wilfond; Neal W Dickert
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Reimagining community relationships for organizational learning: a scoping review with implications for a learning health system.

Authors:  Crystal Milligan; Whitney Berta
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  French Public Familiarity and Attitudes toward Clinical Research during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Émilien Schultz; Jeremy K Ward; Laëtitia Atlani-Duault; Seth M Holmes; Julien Mancini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.