Literature DB >> 28183693

Prophylaxis usage, bleeding rates, and joint outcomes of hemophilia, 1999 to 2010: a surveillance project.

Marilyn J Manco-Johnson1, J Michael Soucie2, Joan Cox Gill3,4.   

Abstract

This analysis of the US Hemophilia Treatment Center Network and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance registry assessed trends in prophylaxis use and its impact on key indicators of arthropathy across the life-span among participants with severe hemophilia A. Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were collected prospectively between 1999 and 2010 at annual clinical visits to 134 hemophilia treatment centers. Trends in treatment and outcomes were evaluated using cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Data analyzed included 26 614 visits for 6196 males; mean age at first registry visit was 17.7 years; and median was 14 (range, 2 to 69). During this time, prophylaxis use increased from 31% to 59% overall, and by 2010, 75% of children and youths <20 years were on prophylaxis. On cross-sectional analysis, bleeding rates decreased dramatically for the entire population (P < .001) in parallel with increased prophylaxis usage, possibly because frequent bleeders adopted prophylaxis. Joint bleeding decreased proportionately with prophylaxis (22%) and nonprophylaxis (23%), and target joints decreased more with prophylaxis (80% vs 61%). Joint, total, and target joint bleeding on prophylaxis were 33%, 41%, and 27%, respectively, compared with nonprophylaxis. On longitudinal analysis of individuals over time, prophylaxis predicted decreased bleeding at any age (P < .001), but only prophylaxis initiation prior to age 4 years and nonobesity predicted preservation of joint motion (P < .001 for each). Using a national registry, care providers in a specialized health care network for a rare disorder were able to detect and track trends in outcomes over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28183693      PMCID: PMC5409445          DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-02-683169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  17 in total

1.  Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Soucie; C Wang; A Forsyth; S Funk; M Denny; K E Roach; D Boone
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.287

2.  Prevalence of depression in adults with haemophilia.

Authors:  M Iannone; L Pennick; A Tom; H Cui; M Gilbert; K Weihs; A T Stopeck
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.287

3.  The universal data collection surveillance system for rare bleeding disorders.

Authors:  J Michael Soucie; Sally McAlister; Ann McClellan; Meredith Oakley; Ying Su
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 4.  Psychosocial aspects of haemophilia: a systematic review of methodologies and findings.

Authors:  F R M Y Cassis; F Querol; A Forsyth; A Iorio
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.287

5.  Physical functioning in boys with hemophilia in the U.S.

Authors:  Paul E Monahan; Judith R Baker; Brenda Riske; J Michael Soucie
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial of routine prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment with sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII in adults with severe hemophilia A (SPINART).

Authors:  M J Manco-Johnson; C L Kempton; M T Reding; T Lissitchkov; S Goranov; L Gercheva; L Rusen; M Ghinea; V Uscatescu; V Rescia; W Hong
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.824

7.  Results of secondary prophylaxis in children with severe hemophilia.

Authors:  M J Manco-Johnson; R Nuss; S Geraghty; S Funk; R Kilcoyne
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 10.047

8.  A longitudinal study of orthopaedic outcomes for severe factor-VIII-deficient haemophiliacs. The Orthopaedic Outcome Study Group.

Authors:  L M Aledort; R H Haschmeyer; H Pettersson
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Efficacy and safety of secondary prophylactic vs. on-demand sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII treatment in adults with severe hemophilia A: results from a 13-month crossover study.

Authors:  P Collins; A Faradji; M Morfini; M M Enriquez; L Schwartz
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2009-10-11       Impact factor: 5.824

10.  Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia.

Authors:  Marilyn J Manco-Johnson; Thomas C Abshire; Amy D Shapiro; Brenda Riske; Michele R Hacker; Ray Kilcoyne; J David Ingram; Michael L Manco-Johnson; Sharon Funk; Linda Jacobson; Leonard A Valentino; W Keith Hoots; George R Buchanan; Donna DiMichele; Michael Recht; Deborah Brown; Cindy Leissinger; Shirley Bleak; Alan Cohen; Prasad Mathew; Alison Matsunaga; Desiree Medeiros; Diane Nugent; Gregory A Thomas; Alexis A Thompson; Kevin McRedmond; J Michael Soucie; Harlan Austin; Bruce L Evatt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  42 in total

1.  Emicizumab should be prescribed independent of immune tolerance induction.

Authors:  Sandra Le Quellec; Claude Negrier
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-10-23

2.  Vascular Permeability and Remodelling Coincide with Inflammatory and Reparative Processes after Joint Bleeding in Factor VIII-Deficient Mice.

Authors:  Esther J Cooke; Jenny Y Zhou; Tine Wyseure; Shweta Joshi; Vikas Bhat; Donald L Durden; Laurent O Mosnier; Annette von Drygalski
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.249

3.  How much clotting is enough?

Authors:  Laurent O Mosnier
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  The frequency of joint hemorrhages and procedures in nonsevere hemophilia A vs B.

Authors:  J Michael Soucie; Paul E Monahan; Roshni Kulkarni; Barbara A Konkle; Marshall A Mazepa
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-08-28

5.  FVIII activity following FVIII protein infusion or FVIII gene transfer predicts the bleeding risk in hemophilia A rats.

Authors:  Karin M Lövgren; Malte S Larsen; Shannon M Zintner; Juliana C Small; Mads Kjelgaard-Hansen; Mattias Häger; Maj Petersen; Bo Wiinberg; Paris Margaritis
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.824

6.  Gene therapy in hemophilia A: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Nicoletta Machin; Margaret V Ragni; Kenneth J Smith
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-07-24

7.  A cross-sectional analysis of cardiovascular disease in the hemophilia population.

Authors:  Suman L Sood; Dunlei Cheng; Margaret Ragni; Craig M Kessler; Doris Quon; Amy D Shapiro; Nigel S Key; Marilyn J Manco-Johnson; Adam Cuker; Christine Kempton; Tzu-Fei Wang; M Elaine Eyster; Philip Kuriakose; Annette von Drygalski; Joan Cox Gill; Allison Wheeler; Peter Kouides; Miguel A Escobar; Cindy Leissinger; Sarah Galdzicka; Marshall Corson; Crystal Watson; Barbara A Konkle
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-06-12

Review 8.  Haemophilia.

Authors:  Erik Berntorp; Kathelijn Fischer; Daniel P Hart; Maria Elisa Mancuso; David Stephensen; Amy D Shapiro; Victor Blanchette
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 52.329

9.  Community counts: Evolution of a national surveillance system for bleeding disorders.

Authors:  Marilyn J Manco-Johnson; Vanessa R Byams; Michael Recht; Becky Dudley; Brandi Dupervil; Diane J Aschman; Meredith Oakley; Suzanne Kapica; Mariam Voutsis; Steven Humes; Roshni Kulkarni; Althea M Grant
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 10.047

10.  High prevalence of overweight/obesity in adult persons with hemophilia in Utah and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Ming Y Lim; Guo Wei; Angela P Presson; Paul Bray; George M Rodgers
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.276

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.