Literature DB >> 30143528

The frequency of joint hemorrhages and procedures in nonsevere hemophilia A vs B.

J Michael Soucie1, Paul E Monahan2,3, Roshni Kulkarni4, Barbara A Konkle5,6, Marshall A Mazepa7.   

Abstract

Data are needed on minimal factor activity (FA) levels required to prevent bleeding in hemophilia. We aimed to evaluate associations between hemophilia type and FA level and joint bleeding and orthopedic procedures using longitudinal data. Data were collected over an 11-year period on males with nonsevere hemophilia A or B without inhibitors who were receiving on-demand factor replacement therapy. Data on the number of joint bleeds in the previous 6 months and data on procedures from clinical records were analyzed using regression models. Data were collected on 4771 patients (hemophilia A, 3315; hemophilia B, 1456) from 19 979 clinic visits. Ages ranged from 2 to 91 years and baseline FA level ranged from 1% to 49% with a mean of 9.4%. Joint bleeding rates were heterogeneous across the FA range and were highest among men age 25 to 44 years. Adjusted for FA level, the mean number of joint bleeds per 6 months was 1.4 and 0.7 for patients with hemophilia A and B, respectively (P < .001). Regression models predicted 1.4 and 0.6 bleeds per year for hemophilia A and B patients, respectively, at an FA level of 15%. Patients with hemophilia B were 30% less likely than those with hemophilia A to have undergone an orthopedic procedure. We conclude that joint bleed rates for any given FA level were higher among hemophilia A than hemophilia B patients, and target FA levels of 15% are unlikely to prevent all joint bleeding in US males with hemophilia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30143528      PMCID: PMC6113607          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018020552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


  33 in total

1.  Prophylaxis usage, bleeding rates, and joint outcomes of hemophilia, 1999 to 2010: a surveillance project.

Authors:  Marilyn J Manco-Johnson; J Michael Soucie; Joan Cox Gill
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Definitions in hemophilia: communication from the SSC of the ISTH.

Authors:  V S Blanchette; N S Key; L R Ljung; M J Manco-Johnson; H M van den Berg; A Srivastava
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.824

3.  Point-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound is critical for the diagnosis of hemarthroses, inflammation and soft tissue abnormalities in adult patients with painful haemophilic arthropathy.

Authors:  W Kidder; S Nguyen; J Larios; J Bergstrom; A Ceponis; A von Drygalski
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 4.287

4.  Variation in baseline factor VIII concentration in a retrospective cohort of mild/moderate hemophilia A patients carrying identical F8 mutations.

Authors:  J I Loomans; A S van Velzen; C L Eckhardt; M Peters; A Mäkipernaa; M Holmstrom; P P Brons; N Dors; S Haya; J Voorberg; J G van der Bom; K Fijnvandraat
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 5.824

5.  Outcome in moderate haemophilia.

Authors:  Ingrid den Uijl; Douwe Biesma; Diederick Grobbee; Kathelijn Fischer
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.443

6.  A longitudinal study of orthopaedic outcomes for severe factor-VIII-deficient haemophiliacs. The Orthopaedic Outcome Study Group.

Authors:  L M Aledort; R H Haschmeyer; H Pettersson
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 7.  Hemophilia A and hemophilia B: focus on arthropathy and variables affecting bleeding severity and prophylaxis.

Authors:  M Escobar; S Sallah
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.824

8.  The use of prophylaxis in 2663 children and adults with haemophilia: results of the 2006 Canadian national haemophilia prophylaxis survey.

Authors:  T T Biss; A K Chan; V S Blanchette; L N Iwenofu; M McLimont; M D Carcao
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 4.287

9.  Joint range-of-motion limitations among young males with hemophilia: prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  J Michael Soucie; Christy Cianfrini; Robert L Janco; Roshni Kulkarni; Julie Hambleton; Bruce Evatt; Angela Forsyth; Sue Geraghty; Keith Hoots; Tom Abshire; Randall Curtis; Ann Forsberg; Heather Huszti; Margaret Wagner; Gilbert C White
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  Hemophilia B Leyden and once mysterious cis-regulatory mutations.

Authors:  Alister P W Funnell; Merlin Crossley
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 11.639

View more
  18 in total

1.  BIVV001, a new class of factor VIII replacement for hemophilia A that is independent of von Willebrand factor in primates and mice.

Authors:  Ekta Seth Chhabra; Tongyao Liu; John Kulman; Susannah Patarroyo-White; Buyue Yang; Qi Lu; Douglas Drager; Nancy Moore; Jiayun Liu; Amy M Holthaus; Jurg M Sommer; Ayman Ismail; Deana Rabinovich; Zhan Liu; Arjan van der Flier; Allison Goodman; Chris Furcht; Mark Tie; Tyler Carlage; Randy Mauldin; Terrence M Dobrowsky; Zhiqian Liu; Oblaise Mercury; Lily Zhu; Baisong Mei; Volker Schellenberger; Haiyan Jiang; Glenn F Pierce; Joe Salas; Robert Peters
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Etranacogene dezaparvovec (AMT-061 phase 2b): normal/near normal FIX activity and bleed cessation in hemophilia B.

Authors:  Annette Von Drygalski; Adam Giermasz; Giancarlo Castaman; Nigel S Key; Susan Lattimore; Frank W G Leebeek; Wolfgang Miesbach; Michael Recht; Alison Long; Robert Gut; Eileen K Sawyer; Steven W Pipe
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-11-12

Review 3.  How do we optimally utilize factor concentrates in persons with hemophilia?

Authors:  Ming Y Lim
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

4.  Patient-relevant health outcomes for hemophilia care: Development of an international standard outcomes set.

Authors:  Erna C van Balen; Brian O'Mahony; Marjon H Cnossen; Gerard Dolan; Victor S Blanchette; Kathelijn Fischer; Deborah Gue; Jamie O'Hara; Alfonso Iorio; Shannon Jackson; Barbara A Konkle; Diane J Nugent; Donna Coffin; Mark W Skinner; Cees Smit; Alok Srivastava; Fred van Eenennaam; Johanna G van der Bom; Samantha C Gouw
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-03-06

5.  Efficacy of EHL N9-GP for on-demand treatment of bleeding episodes in hemophilia B: analysis of pivotal trial data.

Authors:  Miguel A Escobar; Christopher E Walsh; David L Cooper; Guy Young
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2019-07-25

6.  Correlations between patient-reported outcomes and self-reported characteristics in adults with hemophilia B and caregivers of children with hemophilia B: analysis of the B-HERO-S study.

Authors:  Tyler W Buckner; Robert Sidonio; Michelle Witkop; Christine Guelcher; Susan Cutter; Neeraj N Iyer; David L Cooper
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2019-09-18

Review 7.  Hemophilia A and B: molecular and clinical similarities and differences.

Authors:  Giancarlo Castaman; Davide Matino
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 9.941

8.  Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling Of On-Demand And Surgical Use Of Nonacog Beta Pegol (N9-GP) And rFIXFc Based Upon The paradigm 7 Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study.

Authors:  Mindy L Simpson; Roshni Kulkarni; Carmen Escuriola Ettingshausen; Rikke Medom Meldgaard; David L Cooper; Robert Klamroth
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2019-11-13

9.  Hemophilia management: Huge impact of a tiny difference.

Authors:  Fabienne Kloosterman; Anne-Fleur Zwagemaker; Amal Abdi; Samantha Gouw; Giancarlo Castaman; Karin Fijnvandraat
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-02-28

Review 10.  Gene Therapy for Hemophilia: Facts and Quandaries in the 21st Century.

Authors:  Valder R Arruda; Bhavya S Doshi
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.