Literature DB >> 23528101

Randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial of routine prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment with sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII in adults with severe hemophilia A (SPINART).

M J Manco-Johnson1, C L Kempton, M T Reding, T Lissitchkov, S Goranov, L Gercheva, L Rusen, M Ghinea, V Uscatescu, V Rescia, W Hong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefits of routine prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment with factor VIII products have not been evaluated in controlled clinical trials in older patients with hemophilia A.
OBJECTIVES: To report results from a preplanned analysis of data from the first year of the 3-year SPINART study, which compares routine prophylaxis with on-demand treatment with sucrose-formulated recombinant FVIII (rFVIII-FS). PATIENTS/
METHODS: SPINART is an open-label, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, multinational trial. Males aged 12-50 years with severe hemophilia A, ≥ 150 days of exposure to FVIII, no FVIII inhibitors, no prophylaxis for > 12 consecutive months in the past 5 years and 6-24 bleeding episodes in the preceding 6 months were randomized 1 : 1 to rFVIII-FS prophylaxis (25 IU kg(-1) , three times weekly) or on-demand treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint, number of total bleeding episodes in the intent-to-treat population, was analyzed after the last patient had completed 1 year of follow-up. A negative binomial model was used for the primary endpoint analysis; analysis of variance was used for confirmatory analysis of annualized bleeding rates.
RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were enrolled and analyzed (n = 42 per group; mean age, 30.6 years; median treatment duration, 1.7 years). The median number of total bleeding episodes and total bleeding episodes per year were significantly lower with prophylaxis than with on-demand treatment (total, 0 vs. 54.5; total per year, 0 vs. 27.9; both P < 0.0001). No treatment-related adverse events occurred, and no patients developed FVIII inhibitors.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine prophylaxis with rFVIII-FS leads to a significant reduction in bleeding as compared with on-demand treatment. Adverse events were consistent with the established rFVIII-FS safety profile.
© 2013 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hemophilia A; on demand; prophylaxis; sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23528101     DOI: 10.1111/jth.12202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  31 in total

Review 1.  Present and future challenges in the treatment of haemophilia: the patient's perspective.

Authors:  Romano Arcieri; Angelo C Molinari; Stefania Farace; Giuseppe Mazza; Alberto Garnero; Gabriele Calizzani; Paola Giordano; Emily Oliovecchio; Lorenzo Mantovani; Lamberto Manzoli; Paul Giangrande
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Principles of treatment and update of recommendations for the management of haemophilia and congenital bleeding disorders in Italy.

Authors:  Angiola Rocino; Antonio Coppola; Massimo Franchini; Giancarlo Castaman; Cristina Santoro; Ezio Zanon; Elena Santagostino; Massimo Morfini
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Prophylaxis usage, bleeding rates, and joint outcomes of hemophilia, 1999 to 2010: a surveillance project.

Authors:  Marilyn J Manco-Johnson; J Michael Soucie; Joan Cox Gill
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Current and evolving features in the clinical management of haemophilia.

Authors:  Antonio Coppola; Massimo Morfini; Ernesto Cimino; Antonella Tufano; Anna M Cerbone; Giovanni Di Minno
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 5.  Uncovered needs in the management of inherited bleeding disorders in Italy.

Authors:  Romano Arcieri; Angelo C Molinari; Stefania Farace; Giuseppe Mazza; Alberto Garnero; Gabriele Calizzani; Paola Giordano; Emily Oliovecchio; Lorenzo Mantovani; Lamberto Manzoli; Paul Giangrande
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 6.  Low Dose Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Care.

Authors:  Neeraj Sidharthan; Remya Sudevan
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 7.  BAY 81-8973, a full-length recombinant factor VIII for the treatment of hemophilia A: product review.

Authors:  Johnny N Mahlangu; Sanjay P Ahuja; Jerzy Windyga; Nikki Church; Anita Shah; Lawrence Schwartz
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2018-06-12

8.  [Efficacy of short-term full-dose prophylaxis in adult Chinese patients with severe hemophilia A].

Authors:  Xueyan Sun; Jinmu Zhuang; Xuan Zhou; Huiping Li; Zhuqin Liu; Jing Sun
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-09-30

9.  Phase 3 study of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein in severe hemophilia A.

Authors:  Johnny Mahlangu; Jerry S Powell; Margaret V Ragni; Pratima Chowdary; Neil C Josephson; Ingrid Pabinger; Hideji Hanabusa; Naresh Gupta; Roshni Kulkarni; Patrick Fogarty; David Perry; Amy Shapiro; K John Pasi; Shashikant Apte; Ivan Nestorov; Haiyan Jiang; Shuanglian Li; Srividya Neelakantan; Lynda M Cristiano; Jaya Goyal; Jurg M Sommer; Jennifer A Dumont; Nigel Dodd; Karen Nugent; Gloria Vigliani; Alvin Luk; Aoife Brennan; Glenn F Pierce
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Long-Term Outcomes of Previously Treated Adult and Adolescent Patients with Severe Hemophilia A Receiving Prophylaxis with Extended Half-Life FVIII Treatments: An Economic Analysis from a United Kingdom Perspective.

Authors:  Gary Benson; Tim Morton; Huw Thomas; Xin Ying Lee
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.