Literature DB >> 2817159

Breast cancer risk and participation in mammographic screening.

S Taplin1, C Anderman, L Grothaus.   

Abstract

Within the context of an organized breast cancer screening program we conducted a prospective evaluation of the relation between breast cancer risk and participation in mammographic screening. The influence on participation of known breast cancer risk factors, as well as a summary risk label, (i.e. "high", or "moderate") were examined. The overall participation rate was 71 percent among 2,422 women, 50 to 79 years of age, invited to a centralized clinic. Multivariate analyses showed participation to be somewhat decreased among women with late menopause and definitely increased among women with any of the following factors: 1) increased age; 2) a family history of breast cancer; and 3) a previous breast biopsy. Women in the high-risk group were most likely to participate but the effect of the label was stronger among women ages 50 to 59 compared to women ages 60 to 79. The study results are generally consistent with previous findings that participants in screening programs have higher rates of breast cancer. The results also suggest the possibility that providing breast cancer risk information may encourage participation in screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2817159      PMCID: PMC1349799          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.79.11.1494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  20 in total

1.  Smokers and drinkers in a health maintenance organization population: lifestyles and health status.

Authors:  D C Pearson; L C Grothaus; R S Thompson; E H Wagner
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Addressing the needs and solutions to increase the use of low-cost screening mammography.

Authors:  G D Dodd; D J Fink; D A Bertram
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The behavioural aspects of breast and cervical screening.

Authors:  P Hobbs
Journal:  Radiography       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec

4.  Case-control studies for the evaluation of screening.

Authors:  A J Sasco; N E Day; S D Walter
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

5.  Motivation to participate in cancer screening programmes.

Authors:  D R Schwoon; H J Schmoll
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Impact of efforts to increase participation in repetitive screenings for early breast cancer detection.

Authors:  R Fink; S Shapiro; R Roester
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Selected psychosocial models and correlates of individual health-related behaviors.

Authors:  M H Becker; D P Haefner; S V Kasl; J P Kirscht; L A Maiman; I M Rosenstock
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Mammography screening: successes and problems in implementing widespread use in the United States.

Authors:  R H Gold; L W Bassett; S A Fox
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves.

Authors:  P Hobbs; A Smith; W D George; R A Sellwood
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 10.  The Health Belief Model: a decade later.

Authors:  N K Janz; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1984
View more
  18 in total

1.  Gail model breast cancer risk components are poor predictors of risk perception and screening behavior.

Authors:  M B Daly; C L Lerman; E Ross; M D Schwartz; C B Sands; A Masny
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Effects of a web-based intervention on women's breast health behaviors.

Authors:  Deborah J Bowen; Robert Robbins; Nigel Bush; Hendrika Meischke; Abi Ludwig; Jean Wooldridge
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  The Effect of Genetic Counseling on Knowledge and Perceptions Regarding Risks for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  M Sagi; L Kaduri; J Zlotogora; T Peretz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Effects of a Web-based intervention on women's breast health behaviors.

Authors:  Deborah J Bowen; Robert Robbins; Nigel Bush; Hendrika Meischke; Abi Ludwig; Jean Wooldridge
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 5.  Adherence and psychological adjustment among women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  C Lerman; M Schwartz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Impact of breast cancer family history on tumor detection and tumor size in women newly-diagnosed with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Fabienne Dominique Schwab; Nicole Bürki; Dorothy Jane Huang; Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz; Seraina Margaretha Schmid; Marcus Vetter; Andreas Schötzau; Uwe Güth
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Health Belief Model variables as predictors of screening mammography utilization.

Authors:  R B Hyman; S Baker; R Ephraim; A Moadel; J Philip
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-08

8.  Factors associated with perceived risk of breast cancer among women attending a screening program.

Authors:  S W Vernon; V G Vogel; S Halabi; M L Bondy
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Breast cancer screening among relatives of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  K M Kaplan; G B Weinberg; A Small; J L Herndon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Using physician correspondence and postcard reminders to promote mammography use.

Authors:  S H Taplin; C Anderman; L Grothaus; S Curry; D Montano
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.