Literature DB >> 8932877

Gail model breast cancer risk components are poor predictors of risk perception and screening behavior.

M B Daly1, C L Lerman, E Ross, M D Schwartz, C B Sands, A Masny.   

Abstract

The Gail model is being used increasingly to determine individual breast cancer risk and to tailor preventive health recommendations accordingly. Although widely known to the medical and biostatistical communities, the risk factors included in the model may not be salient to the women to whom the model is being applied. This study explored the relationship of the individual Gail model risk factors to perceived risk of breast cancer and prior breast cancer screening among women with a family history of breast cancer. Data from baseline interviews with 969 women found a striking disparity between the objective risk factors included in the model and the accuracy of perceived risk and screening behaviors of this population, particularly among women over the age of 50 years. Risk perception accuracy was unrelated to all of the Gail model risk factors for all age groups. Reported mammography adherence was only associated with having had a breast biopsy in both age groups. Breast self examination (BSE) practice was independent of all measured factors for both age groups. These findings support the need for further research to identify additional determinants of risk perception and motivators of screening behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8932877     DOI: 10.1007/bf01807037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  36 in total

1.  The American Cancer Society Guidelines for the cancer-related checkup: an update.

Authors:  C Mettlin; G D Dodd
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  A community-wide program in breast self-examination training and maintenance.

Authors:  J K Worden; L J Solomon; B S Flynn; M C Costanza; R S Foster; A L Dorwaldt; S O Weaver
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Risk perceptions and participation in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  S J Blalock; B M DeVellis; R A Afifi; R S Sandler
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Role of genetic factors in breast cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  A L Børresen
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.089

5.  Factors associated with perceived risk of breast cancer among women attending a screening program.

Authors:  S W Vernon; V G Vogel; S Halabi; M L Bondy
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  A community-based heart disease intervention: predictors of change.

Authors:  M A Winkleby; J A Flora; H C Kraemer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Survival patterns among younger women with breast cancer: the effects of age, race, stage, and treatment.

Authors:  G M Swanson; C S Lin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1994

8.  Breast self-examination and survival from breast cancer.

Authors:  C M Huguley; R L Brown; R S Greenberg; W S Clark
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Validation of the Gail et al. model for predicting individual breast cancer risk.

Authors:  D Spiegelman; G A Colditz; D Hunter; E Hertzmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1994-04-20       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  C Lerman; M Daly; C Sands; A Balshem; E Lustbader; T Heggan; L Goldstein; J James; P Engstrom
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-07-07       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  22 in total

1.  To test or not to test? Moderators of the relationship between risk perceptions and interest in predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Shiri Ilan
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-09-30

Review 2.  Predictors of choosing life-long screening or prophylactic surgery in women at high and moderate risk for breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  J R J De Leeuw; M J van Vliet; M G E M Ausems
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  The Complexity of Achieving the Promise of Precision Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Factors influencing adherence to mammography screening guidelines in Appalachian women participating in a mobile mammography program.

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Traci LeMasters; Elvonna Atkins; Sara Gainor; Stephenie Kennedy; Kimberly Kelly; Linda Vona-Davis; Scot Remick
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-06

5.  Effects of a risk-based online mammography intervention on accuracy of perceived risk and mammography intentions.

Authors:  Holli H Seitz; Laura Gibson; Christine Skubisz; Heather Forquer; Susan Mello; Marilyn M Schapira; Katrina Armstrong; Joseph N Cappella
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-05-04

6.  Breast cancer risk perception and lifestyle behaviors among White and Black women with a family history of the disease.

Authors:  Denise Spector; Merle Mishel; Celette Sugg Skinner; Lisa A Deroo; Marcia Vanriper; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.592

7.  Subjective versus objective risk in genetic counseling for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Anita Caruso; Cristina Vigna; Bruna Marozzo; Fabio M Sega; Isabella Sperduti; Francesco Cognetti; Antonella Savarese
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-21

8.  Perceived risk of breast cancer among Latinas attending community clinics: risk comprehension and relationship with mammography adherence.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Elmer Huerta; Jennifer Cullen; Elizabeth Kaufman; Vanessa Sheppard; George Luta; Claudine Isaacs; Marc D Schwartz; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Gail model risk assessment and risk perceptions.

Authors:  John M Quillin; Elizabeth Fries; Donna McClish; Ellen Shaw de Paredes; Joann Bodurtha
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2004-04

10.  Perceived and objective breast cancer risk assessment in Chilean women living in an underserved area.

Authors:  Matthew P Banegas; Klaus Püschel; Javiera Martínez-Gutiérrez; Jennifer C Anderson; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.