Samuel Byeongjun Park1, Jung-Gun Kim1, Ki-Woong Lim1, Chae-Hyun Yoon1, Dong-Jun Kim1, Han-Sung Kang2, Yung-Ho Jo3. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsanro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, 10408, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. 2. Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsanro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, 10408, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsanro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, 10408, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. joyh@ncc.re.kr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We developed an image-guided intervention robot system that can be operated in a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging gantry. The system incorporates a bendable needle intervention robot for breast cancer patients that overcomes the space limitations of the MR gantry. METHODS: Most breast coil designs for breast MR imaging have side openings to allow manual localization. However, for many intervention procedures, the patient must be removed from the gantry. A robotic manipulation system with integrated image guidance software was developed. Our robotic manipulator was designed to be slim, so as to fit between the patient's side and the MR gantry wall. Only non-magnetic materials were used, and an electromagnetic shield was employed for cables and circuits. The image guidance software was built using open source libraries. In situ feasibility tests were performed in a 3-T MR system. One target point in the breast phantom was chosen by the clinician for each experiment, and our robot moved the needle close to the target point. RESULTS: Without image-guided feedback control, the needle end could not hit the target point (distance = 5 mm) in the first experiment. Using our robotic system, the needle hits the target lesion of the breast phantom at a distance of 2.3 mm from the same target point using image-guided feedback. The second experiment was performed using other target points, and the distance between the final needle end point and the target point was 0.8 mm. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully developed an MR-guided needle intervention robot for breast cancer patients. Further research will allow the expansion of these interventions.
PURPOSE: We developed an image-guided intervention robot system that can be operated in a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging gantry. The system incorporates a bendable needle intervention robot for breast cancerpatients that overcomes the space limitations of the MR gantry. METHODS: Most breast coil designs for breast MR imaging have side openings to allow manual localization. However, for many intervention procedures, the patient must be removed from the gantry. A robotic manipulation system with integrated image guidance software was developed. Our robotic manipulator was designed to be slim, so as to fit between the patient's side and the MR gantry wall. Only non-magnetic materials were used, and an electromagnetic shield was employed for cables and circuits. The image guidance software was built using open source libraries. In situ feasibility tests were performed in a 3-T MR system. One target point in the breast phantom was chosen by the clinician for each experiment, and our robot moved the needle close to the target point. RESULTS: Without image-guided feedback control, the needle end could not hit the target point (distance = 5 mm) in the first experiment. Using our robotic system, the needle hits the target lesion of the breast phantom at a distance of 2.3 mm from the same target point using image-guided feedback. The second experiment was performed using other target points, and the distance between the final needle end point and the target point was 0.8 mm. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully developed an MR-guided needle intervention robot for breast cancerpatients. Further research will allow the expansion of these interventions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bendable needle; Breast cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Medical robotics; Needle intervention
Authors: Terry S Yoo; Michael J Ackerman; William E Lorensen; Will Schroeder; Vikram Chalana; Stephen Aylward; Dimitris Metaxas; Ross Whitaker Journal: Stud Health Technol Inform Date: 2002
Authors: Axel Krieger; Iulian I Iordachita; Peter Guion; Anurag K Singh; Aradhana Kaushal; Cynthia Ménard; Peter A Pinto; Kevin Camphausen; Gabor Fichtinger; Louis L Whitcomb Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Michael Muntener; Alexandru Patriciu; Doru Petrisor; Dumitru Mazilu; Herman Bagga; Louis Kavoussi; Kevin Cleary; Dan Stoianovici Journal: Urology Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Andreas Melzer; Bernd Gutmann; Thomas Remmele; Renate Wolf; Andreas Lukoscheck; Michael Bock; Hubert Bardenheuer; Harald Fischer Journal: IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag Date: 2008 May-Jun
Authors: Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 7.396