| Literature DB >> 28165067 |
Nadya Andini1, Bo Wang2, Pornpat Athamanolap3, Justin Hardick4, Billie J Masek5, Simone Thair1, Anne Hu1, Gideon Avornu5, Stephen Peterson5, Steven Cogill1, Richard E Rothman4,5, Karen C Carroll6, Charlotte A Gaydos4,5, Jeff Tza-Huei Wang3,7, Serafim Batzoglou2, Samuel Yang1.
Abstract
There is still an ongoing demand for a simple broad-spectrum molecular diagnostic assay for pathogenic bacteria. For this purpose, we developed a single-plex High Resolution Melt (HRM) assay that generates complex melt curves for bacterial identification. Using internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as the phylogenetic marker for HRM, we observed complex melt curve signatures as compared to 16S rDNA amplicons with enhanced interspecies discrimination. We also developed a novel Naïve Bayes curve classification algorithm with statistical interpretation and achieved 95% accuracy in differentiating 89 bacterial species in our library using leave-one-out cross-validation. Pilot clinical validation of our method correctly identified the etiologic organisms at the species-level in 59 culture-positive mono-bacterial blood culture samples with 90% accuracy. Our findings suggest that broad bacterial sequences may be simply, reliably and automatically profiled by ITS HRM assay for clinical adoption.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28165067 PMCID: PMC5292719 DOI: 10.1038/srep42097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Workflow of our ITS HRM assay.
The ITS HRM assay is performed on DNA extracted from clinical samples such as positive blood culture samples. Our novel classification algorithm allows generated melt curves to identify the bacterial pathogens by matching against a reference database. Same-colored dots represent replicates from the same species classified within their boundaries and black dots outside all boundaries represent replicates from species that is not in our reference database, whereas the unknown species in the test sample (X) is identified by the classification algorithm.
Figure 2ITS Provides High Information Profiles Inclusive to the Species Level.
(a) Representative 16S and ITS melt curves of seven (7) species of the Bacillus genus. (b) 16S and ITS composite melt curves of all 89 bacterial organisms in our library. (c) ITS melt curves from a single strain of B. anthracis, B. mycoides, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, P. putida are compared to the their undistinguishable 16S counterparts. (d) ITS melt curves from two (2) strains of B. anthracis, 2 strains of Y. pestis, and five (5) strains of S. pneumoniae are used for the strain inclusivity test.
Figure 3Heteroduplex analysis of E. coli ITS.
(a) Clustal Omega Multiple Sequence Alignment of E. coli ATCC 25922 (GenBank Accession number CP009072) ITS short (361 bp) and ITS long (453 bp) sequences. (b) ITS homoduplex-heteroduplex profiles obtained after 20 (1), 25 (2), 30 (3), 35 (4) and 40 (5) number of PCR cycles. Slow migrating bands (at 800 and 1000 bp) were visible starting from cycle number 25, suggesting the heteroduplex nature of the bands. Expected homoduplex bands were at 540 bp (361 bp ITS short + 179 bp of 3′ of 16S and 38 bp of 5′ 23S), and 632 bp (453 bp + 179 bp). Lane M contains 100-bp DNA marker. (c) Agarose gel electrophoresis showing E. coli ITS PCR products treated (2) and untreated (1) with mung bean nuclease, an enzyme that recognizes and cleaves single stranded DNA, even when it is located in double-stranded DNA products. The loss of the higher molecular weight bands confirms the heteroduplex nature of the bands, leaving the true homoduplexes. Lane M contains 100-bp DNA marker. (d) ITS HRM analysis on 20 colonies resulted in 2 distinct melt curve groups (ITS short and ITS long). Combinations of the amplicons from each group did not recreate the original E. coli melt curve.
Identification results of 59 positive clinical blood culture samples.
| Positive Clinical Blood Culture Samples | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Identification Results | ITS HRM Result | ||||
| Culture Result | Sequencing Result | Top 1 Match | Top 2 Match | |||
| Classified | Misclassified | Classified | Misclassified | |||
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | ||||||
| 3 | ||||||
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | ||||||
| 6 | ||||||
| 7 | ||||||
| 8 | ||||||
| 9 | ||||||
| 10 | ||||||
| 11 | ||||||
| 12 | ||||||
| 13 | ||||||
| 14 | ||||||
| 15 | ||||||
| 16 | ||||||
| 17 | ||||||
| 18 | ||||||
| 19 | ||||||
| 20 | ||||||
| 21 | ||||||
| 22 | ||||||
| 23 | ||||||
| 24 | Streptococcus group B | |||||
| 25 | ||||||
| 26 | ||||||
| 27 | ||||||
| 28 | ||||||
| 29 | ||||||
| 30 | ||||||
| 31 | ||||||
| 32 | ||||||
| 33 | ||||||
| 34 | ||||||
| 35 | ||||||
| 36 | ||||||
| 37 | ||||||
| 38 | ||||||
| 39 | ||||||
| 40 | ||||||
| 41 | ||||||
| 42 | ||||||
| 43 | ||||||
| 44 | Viridans streptococcus group | |||||
| 45 | ||||||
| 46 | ||||||
| 47 | ||||||
| 48 | ||||||
| 49 | U | |||||
| 50 | U | |||||
| 51 | U | |||||
| 52 | U | |||||
| 53 | U | |||||
| 54 | ||||||
| 55 | Viridans streptococcus group | |||||
| 56 | ||||||
| 57 | ||||||
| 58 | U | U | ||||
| 59 | U | U | ||||
U: Unknown (sample identified as an organism that was not in the database).