Literature DB >> 22771747

Neuromuscular and biomechanical compensation for wing asymmetry in insect hovering flight.

María José Fernández1, Dwight Springthorpe, Tyson L Hedrick.   

Abstract

Wing damage is common in flying insects and has been studied using a variety of approaches to assess its biomechanical and fitness consequences. Results of these studies range from strong to nil effect among the variety of species, fitness measurements and damage modes studied, suggesting that not all damage modes are equal and that insects may be well adapted to compensate for some types of damage. Here, we examine the biomechanical and neuromuscular means by which flying insects compensate for asymmetric wing damage, which is expected to produce asymmetric flight forces and torques and thus destabilize the animal in addition to reducing its total wing size. We measured the kinematic and neuromuscular responses of hawkmoths (Manduca sexta) hovering in free flight with asymmetrically damaged wings via high-speed videography and extracellular neuromuscular activity recordings. The animals responded to asymmetric wing damage with asymmetric changes to wing stroke amplitude sufficient to restore symmetry in lift production. These asymmetries in stroke amplitude were significantly correlated with bilateral asymmetries in the timing of activation of the dorsal ventral muscle among and within trials. Correspondingly, the magnitude of wing asymmetry was significantly, although non-linearly, correlated with the magnitude of the neuromuscular response among individuals. The strongly non-linear nature of the relationship suggests that active neural compensation for asymmetric wing damage may only be necessary above a threshold (>12% asymmetry in wing second moment of area in this case) below which passive mechanisms may be adequate to maintain flight stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22771747     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.073627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  Flexibility and control of thorax deformation during hawkmoth flight.

Authors:  Noriyasu Ando; Ryohei Kanzaki
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Flies compensate for unilateral wing damage through modular adjustments of wing and body kinematics.

Authors:  Florian T Muijres; Nicole A Iwasaki; Michael J Elzinga; Johan M Melis; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 3.  The aerodynamics and control of free flight manoeuvres in Drosophila.

Authors:  Michael H Dickinson; Florian T Muijres
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Rapid frequency modulation in a resonant system: aerial perturbation recovery in hawkmoths.

Authors:  Jeff Gau; Ryan Gemilere; Lds-Vip Fm Subteam; James Lynch; Nick Gravish; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Wings and halteres act as coupled dual oscillators in flies.

Authors:  Tanvi Deora; Siddharth S Sane; Sanjay P Sane
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Direct lateral maneuvers in hawkmoths.

Authors:  Jeremy S M Greeter; Tyson L Hedrick
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.422

Review 7.  Biomechanics and biomimetics in insect-inspired flight systems.

Authors:  Hao Liu; Sridhar Ravi; Dmitry Kolomenskiy; Hiroto Tanaka
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Domestic egg-laying hens, Gallus gallus domesticus, do not modulate flapping flight performance in response to wing condition.

Authors:  Brianna M León; Bret W Tobalske; Neila Ben Sassi; Renée Garant; Donald R Powers; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.963

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.