Literature DB >> 18753325

Threshold tuning curves of chinchilla auditory nerve fibers. II. Dependence on spontaneous activity and relation to cochlear nonlinearity.

Andrei N Temchin1, Nola C Rich, Mario A Ruggero.   

Abstract

Spontaneous activity and frequency threshold tuning curves were studied in thousands of auditory nerve fibers in chinchilla. The frequency distribution of spontaneous activity rates is strongly bimodal for auditory nerve fibers with characteristic frequency <3 kHz but only mildly bimodal for the entire sample. Spontaneous activity rates and thresholds at the characteristic frequency are inversely related. Auditory-nerve fibers with low spontaneous rate have tuning curves with lower tip-to-tail ratios and more sharply tuned tips than the tuning curves of fibers with high spontaneous rates. It is shown here that this dependence of tuning on spontaneous rates is consistent with a previously unnoticed nonmonotonic dependence on iso-velocity criterion of the frequency tuning of basilar membrane vibrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18753325      PMCID: PMC2585395          DOI: 10.1152/jn.90639.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  30 in total

1.  Functional correlates of characteristic frequency in single cochlear nerve fibers of the Mongolian gerbil.

Authors:  K K Ohlemiller; S M Echteler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Intracellular labeling of auditory nerve fibers in guinea pig: central and peripheral projections.

Authors:  J Tsuji; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1997-05-05       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  DISCHARGE PATTERN AND INHIBITION OF PRIMARY AUDITORY NERVE FIBERS IN THE MONKEY.

Authors:  M NOMOTO; N SUGA; Y KATSUKI
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Response properties of single auditory nerve fibers in the mouse.

Authors:  Annette M Taberner; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Basilar membrane mechanics in the 6-9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae.

Authors:  William S Rhode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Ultrastructural differences among afferent synapses on cochlear hair cells: correlations with spontaneous discharge rate.

Authors:  A Merchan-Perez; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1996-07-22       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; N C Rich; A Recio; S S Narayan; L Robles
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The cochlear place-frequency map of the adult and developing Mongolian gerbil.

Authors:  M Müller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Diversity of characteristic frequency rate-intensity functions in guinea pig auditory nerve fibres.

Authors:  I M Winter; D Robertson; G K Yates
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Auditory nerve of the normal and jaundiced rat. II. Frequency selectivity and two-tone rate suppression.

Authors:  A el Barbary
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  21 in total

1.  Isoresponse versus isoinput estimates of cochlear filter tuning.

Authors:  Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-23

2.  A canonical oscillator model of cochlear dynamics.

Authors:  Karl D Lerud; Ji Chul Kim; Felix V Almonte; Laurel H Carney; Edward W Large
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory nerve responses to chimaeric speech.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-14

4.  Auditory brainstem response latency in forward masking, a marker of sensory deficits in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.

Authors:  Golbarg Mehraei; Andreu Paredes Gallardo; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations.

Authors:  Jingjing Sherry Wu; Eric D Young; Elisabeth Glowatzki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Spatial irregularities of sensitivity along the organ of Corti of the cochlea.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Stapes Vibration in the Chinchilla Middle Ear: Relation to Behavioral and Auditory-Nerve Thresholds.

Authors:  Luis Robles; Andrei N Temchin; Yun-Hui Fan; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-12

8.  Phase-locked responses to tones of chinchilla auditory nerve fibers: implications for apical cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-17

9.  Threshold tuning curves of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers. I. Dependence on characteristic frequency and relation to the magnitudes of cochlear vibrations.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Nola C Rich; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  On the controversy about the sharpness of human cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Almudena Eustaquio-Martin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.