| Literature DB >> 28154823 |
Yang Qiao1, Hong-Yue Tao1, Kui Ma2, Zi-Ying Wu2, Jian-Xun Qu3, Shuang Chen1.
Abstract
Objective. To compare T2⁎ value of healthy and diseased Achilles tendons (AT) with a recently introduced three-dimensional ultrashort echo time (3D-UTE) sequence and analyze the correlation between T2⁎ value and clinical scores. Methods. Ten patients with symptomatic Achilles tendon and ten healthy volunteers were investigated with 3D-UTE sequence on a 3T magnetic resonance (MR) scanner. T2⁎ values of four regions in Achilles tendons were calculated. The clinical outcomes of patients were evaluated according to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and Achilles Tendon Rupture Score (ATRS). An independent sample t-test was used to compare the differences of T2⁎ value and clinical scores between two groups. The Pearson correlation coefficient between clinical scores and T2⁎ values was assessed. Results. The T2⁎ values of Achilles tendon were statistically significantly different between patients and volunteers. The Pearson correlation coefficients between T2⁎ and AOFAS or ATRS scores of patients were r = -0.733 and r = -0.634, respectively. Conclusion. The variability of T2⁎ in healthy and pathologic AT can be quantified by UTE-T2⁎. T2⁎ may be a promising marker to detect and diagnose AT tendinopathy. UTE-T2⁎ could give a precise guidance to clinical outcome.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28154823 PMCID: PMC5244000 DOI: 10.1155/2017/2729807
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1ROIs of Achilles tendon on sagittal UTE image acquired at TE = 0.032 ms. INS = insertion, MID = middle, MTJ = muscle-tendon junction; these three ROIs were equally divided according to the longitudinal length of Achilles tendon. The bulk ROI consisted of all the three ROIs.
Figure 2UTE T2⁎ mapping on diseased (a) and healthy (b) Achilles tendons of a 36-year-old male acquired at TE = 0.032 ms. Color scale represents T2⁎ values. The increase of T2⁎ values was observed in diseased tendon.
Comparison of T2 values between patients and volunteers. Mean (M) and standard deviation (SD) as well as P value were presented. The P value applied the significant difference in the four parts. Mean (M) and standard deviation (SD) of AOFAS and ATRS scores were also presented.
| Patients | Volunteers |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | SD | M | SD | |||
| T2 | Bulk | 12.508 | 0.940 | 11.081 | 0.297 | 0.001 |
| MTJ | 11.977 | 0.831 | 11.005 | 0.581 | 0.007 | |
| MID | 12.474 | 1.261 | 11.124 | 0.394 | 0.008 | |
| INS | 13.124 | 0.943 | 11.084 | 0.522 | 0.000 | |
| AOFAS score | 70.6 | 5.58 | ||||
| ATRS score | 52.8 | 8.27 | ||||
Figure 3(a) A scatter plot of the bulk T2⁎ and AOFAS of ten patients. The Pearson correlation coefficient was r = −0.733 (P = 0.016). (b) A scatter plot of the bulk T2⁎ and ATRS of ten patients. The Pearson correlation coefficient was r = −0.634 (P = 0.049).