Brian J Smith1, Lucas R Parent2, Anna C Overholts3, Peter A Beaucage3, Ryan P Bisbey4, Anton D Chavez4, Nicky Hwang3, Chiwoo Park5, Austin M Evans6, Nathan C Gianneschi7, William R Dichtel4. 1. Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States; Department of Chemistry, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania 17837, United States. 2. Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry and Materials Science & Engineering, University of California, San Diego , La Jolla, California 92093, United States. 3. Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York 14853, United States. 4. Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States; Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States. 5. Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Florida State University , Tallahassee, Florida 32306, United States. 6. Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University , Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States. 7. Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry and Materials Science & Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States; Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry and Materials Science & Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States.
Abstract
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are two- or three-dimensional (2D or 3D) polymer networks with designed topology and chemical functionality, permanent porosity, and high surface areas. These features are potentially useful for a broad range of applications, including catalysis, optoelectronics, and energy storage devices. But current COF syntheses offer poor control over the material's morphology and final form, generally providing insoluble and unprocessable microcrystalline powder aggregates. COF polymerizations are often performed under conditions in which the monomers are only partially soluble in the reaction solvent, and this heterogeneity has hindered understanding of their polymerization or crystallization processes. Here we report homogeneous polymerization conditions for boronate ester-linked, 2D COFs that inhibit crystallite precipitation, resulting in stable colloidal suspensions of 2D COF nanoparticles. The hexagonal, layered structures of the colloids are confirmed by small-angle and wide-angle X-ray scattering, and kinetic characterization provides insight into the growth process. The colloid size is modulated by solvent conditions, and the technique is demonstrated for four 2D boronate ester-linked COFs. The diameter of individual COF nanoparticles in solution is monitored and quantified during COF growth and stabilization at elevated temperature using in situ variable-temperature liquid cell transmission electron microscopy imaging, a new characterization technique that complements conventional bulk scattering techniques. Solution casting of the colloids yields a free-standing transparent COF film with retained crystallinity and porosity, as well as preferential crystallite orientation. Collectively this structural control provides new opportunities for understanding COF formation and designing morphologies for device applications.
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are two- or three-dimensional (2D or 3D) polymer networks with designed topology and chemical functionality, permanent porosity, and high surface areas. These features are potentially useful for a broad range of applications, including catalysis, optoelectronics, and energy storage devices. But current COF syntheses offer poor control over the material's morphology and final form, generally providing insoluble and unprocessable microcrystalline powder aggregates. COFpolymerizations are often performed under conditions in which the monomers are only partially soluble in the reaction solvent, and this heterogeneity has hindered understanding of their polymerization or crystallization processes. Here we report homogeneous polymerization conditions for boronate ester-linked, 2DCOFs that inhibit crystallite precipitation, resulting in stable colloidal suspensions of 2DCOF nanoparticles. The hexagonal, layered structures of the colloids are confirmed by small-angle and wide-angle X-ray scattering, and kinetic characterization provides insight into the growth process. The colloid size is modulated by solvent conditions, and the technique is demonstrated for four 2Dboronate ester-linked COFs. The diameter of individual COF nanoparticles in solution is monitored and quantified during COF growth and stabilization at elevated temperature using in situ variable-temperature liquid cell transmission electron microscopy imaging, a new characterization technique that complements conventional bulk scattering techniques. Solution casting of the colloids yields a free-standing transparent COF film with retained crystallinity and porosity, as well as preferential crystallite orientation. Collectively this structural control provides new opportunities for understanding COF formation and designing morphologies for device applications.
Covalent organic frameworks
(COFs) are crystalline porous polymers
with predictable bonding in two or three dimensions, tunable molecular
structures, and high specific surface areas.[1−5] COFs are potentially attractive for selective membranes,
catalyst supports, organic electronic devices, and electrical energy
storage devices.[6−15] One of the major challenges to harnessing their properties is that
COFs are typically formed as insoluble microcrystalline powders, which
are difficult to process or not useful for these applications. Although
some progress has been made in preparing COF thin films selectively
and with specific crystalline orientations,[16−18] we attribute
the small average crystallite sizes and tendency to form as powders
to empirical screening approaches used to identify polymerization
conditions for new frameworks. We recently reported the first studies
into the mechanism of COF growth using boronate ester systems as a
model network, which identified an irreversible precipitation during
the reaction that inhibited further structural error correction and
crystallite growth.[19] We hypothesized that
this aggregation of crystallites was a function of both rapid, facile
nucleation and intermolecular attractive forces between the crystallites.Here we report a synthetic approach to arrest irreversible crystallite
aggregation and precipitation, resulting in the first stable colloidal
suspensions of COF nanoparticles. The resulting colloids show characteristic
COF crystallinity, with adjustable particle size, low polydispersity,
and long-term stability. We demonstrate the first use of in situ variable-temperature
liquid-cell transmission electron microscopy (VT-LCTEM) with on-chip
heating to directly image hundreds of individual COF nanoparticles
as they form in solution. The colloidal COFs also allow postsynthetic
solution casting to produce free-standing, porous COF films. We anticipate
this synthetic approach to both provide a fundamental understanding
of COF nucleation and growth as well as facilitate device incorporation
through increased morphological control of solution processable films.
Stable suspensions of porous nanoparticles also offer functional internal
surfaces that may prove attractive for drug delivery, chemical sensing,
or site-isolated catalysts.[20,21] More broadly for the
field of solvothermal nanomaterials synthesis, these findings establish
VT-LCTEM as a powerful analytical tool that complements in situ bulk
scattering (light or X-ray) methods for characterizing the size, morphology,
and growth processes of nanostructures in liquid.
Results and Discussion
Colloid
Synthesis
Stable COF colloids form under conditions
that disrupt crystallite aggregation yet do not inhibit polymerization.
In our previous studies of 2Dboronate ester-linked COF formation,
the reaction temperature, monomer identity and concentration, and
the addition of competitors each influence the rate of COF formation,[19,22] but the resulting microcrystalline powders exhibit reasonably consistent
crystalline domain sizes and morphologies. Upon evaluating various
cosolvents to determine their interaction with the formation of COF-5,
a prototypical 2Dboronate-ester linked COF, we found that CH3CN, even at modest volume fractions, prevents precipitation
and provides stable colloidal COF-5 suspensions. Specifically, the
condensation of 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexahydroxytriphenylene (HHTP) and 1,4-phenylenebis(boronic
acid) (PBBA) to form COF-5 under homogeneous conditions (2 mM HHTP,
3 mM PBBA, 4:1 dioxane/mesitylene, 90 °C), modified to include
15–95 vol % CH3CN, provides a translucent solution
that exhibits a pronounced Tyndall effect (Figures and S1A). No
precipitation occurs from the reaction mixture upon cooling, even
after standing for weeks. However, it is possible to sediment these
particles through extended centrifugation, suggesting transient and/or
reversible interactions between particles. Such interactions are not
unexpected given that acetonitrile stabilizing agents stand in notable
contrast to bulky or amphiphilic ligands often used in nanoparticle
syntheses. Colloid formation is specific to nitrile cosolvents, whereas
other cosolvents (e.g., CH2Cl2, THF, toluene)
result in COF-5 precipitation (Figure S1B and Table S1). Benzonitrile also stabilizes colloid growth, suggesting
that a direct interaction between the nitrile functional group and
the COF is responsible for colloid formation. Control experiments,
in which each monomer was subjected to the polymerization conditions
in the absence of the other, show no evidence of nanoparticle formation,
ruling out the formation of simple monomer aggregates. Taken together,
these observations indicate that nitrile solvents uniquely inhibit
the precipitation of COF-5 as a microcrystalline powder. These reaction
conditions provide a previously unattainable means to characterize
COF formation and allow for subsequent solution processing.
Figure 1
(A) Typical
growth conditions for boronate ester-linked 2D COFs
provide insoluble, polycrystalline powders. CH3CN cosolvents
instead yield stable colloidal nanoparticles of the crystalline polymer
networks. (B) Colloid formation as a function of solvent CH3CN percentage (2 mM HHTP, 1.5 equiv of PBBA, 15 equiv of CH3OH, remaining solvent 4:1 dioxane/mesitylene, 90 °C).
(A) Typical
growth conditions for boronate ester-linked 2DCOFs
provide insoluble, polycrystalline powders. CH3CN cosolvents
instead yield stable colloidal nanoparticles of the crystalline polymer
networks. (B) Colloid formation as a function of solvent CH3CN percentage (2 mM HHTP, 1.5 equiv of PBBA, 15 equiv of CH3OH, remaining solvent 4:1 dioxane/mesitylene, 90 °C).
In-Situ Small-Angle and
Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering
The crystallinity and size of
the COF-5 colloidal nanoparticles were
characterized by small-angle and wide-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS/WAXS).
Aliquots of polymerizations performed in the presence of 55% CH3CN (2 mM [HHTP]0, 90 °C) were monitored at
various time points to simultaneously characterize the increase of
particle size and crystallization (Figure ). COF crystallization is observed within
15 min, as determined by the appearance of a peak at 0.24 Å–1, corresponding to the <100> diffraction peak
of
COF-5. The integrated area of this peak increases for the initial
2 h of the polymerization, which matches the time scale of the increase
in particle size calculated from the SAXS data, suggesting that the
earliest observable boronate ester-linked particles are already crystalline.
This behavior is consistent with our previous study of boronate ester-linked
COF precipitation, in which powders isolated in the first few minutes
of the polymerization were both microcrystalline and showed high BET
surface areas (>2000 m2/g).[19] In contrast, 2Dimine-linked COFs form an initial amorphous phase
that crystallizes slowly over extended reaction times.[23]
Figure 2
(A) SAXS/WAXS of in situ COF-5 colloid formation over
time, with
inset of the highlighted <100> diffraction peak (growth conditions:
2 mM HHTP, 1.5 equiv of PBBA, 15 equiv of CH3OH, solvent
55% vol % CH3CN, 90 °C). (B) Particle size and <100>
diffraction integrated area as a function of time. (C) WAXS diffraction
peaks of boronate ester COF colloids prepared using various boronic
acid linkers (red: COF-5; green: COF-10; blue: Py-COF; purple: HHTP-DPB
COF), indicating the generality of this procedure.
(A) SAXS/WAXS of in situ COF-5 colloid formation over
time, with
inset of the highlighted <100> diffraction peak (growth conditions:
2 mM HHTP, 1.5 equiv of PBBA, 15 equiv of CH3OH, solvent
55% vol % CH3CN, 90 °C). (B) Particle size and <100>
diffraction integrated area as a function of time. (C) WAXS diffraction
peaks of boronate esterCOF colloids prepared using various boronic
acid linkers (red: COF-5; green: COF-10; blue: Py-COF; purple: HHTP-DPB
COF), indicating the generality of this procedure.The colloidal COF nanoparticles have relatively
uniform size distributions,
as is evident from the measurable SAXS form factor (Figures and S4). Particle sizes are quantifiable at 25 min at a mean radius of
21 nm, which increases to 30 nm in the initial 2 h. This increased
particle size is accompanied by an increase in the intensity of the
<100> reflection, which suggests that the particle growth occurs
through polymerization and crystallization processes rather than particle
aggregation. Furthermore, the particle size distribution narrows as
the average crystallite size increases, characterized by the full-width
half max (fwhm) of the <100> peak, which is also inconsistent
with
particle aggregation (Figure S4). These
observations indicate that CH3CN stabilizes discrete crystallites
in solution and inhibits their aggregation. The earliest observed
particle sizes are comparable to the 20–40 nm crystalline domains
determined by X-ray diffraction of COF-5 precipitated powders previously
synthesized in the absence of CH3CN.[19] Concurrently, the standard deviation of the particle size
distribution narrows as the particles grow. COF crystallites undergo
further growth after nucleation, which slows over time, presumably
due to monomer consumption. CH3CN stabilizes colloids of
several boronate ester-linked COFs, indicating the generality of this
procedure. HHTP was reacted with 4,4′-biphenylbis(boronic acid),
2,7-pyrenebis(boronic acid), and 4,4′-diphenylbutadiynebis(boronic
acid) under similar conditions to yield colloids of COF-10,[24] TP-COF,[25] and HHTP-DPB
COF,[26] respectively. The crystallinity
of each COF colloidal suspension was confirmed by the presence of
its <100> diffraction peak in the WAXS pattern (Figure C). The feature at 0.16 Å–1 corresponds to the <100> of HHTP-DPB COF, in
addition
to the <110> peak observed at 0.27 Å–1.
The WAXS patterns for COF-10 and TP-COF are consistent with the expected
structures and resolve the slight difference in the length between
the biphenyl and pyrene linkages. The kinetics of DPB-HHTPCOF colloid
formation were similar to that of COF-5, with framework crystallinity
again observed at the earliest time points at which particle size
is detectable (Figure S5). These combined
observations demonstrate the generality of the colloidal stabilization
of 2Dboronate ester-linked COFs by the CH3CN cosolvent.
It is therefore likely that CH3CN interacts directly with
the boronate linkages to attenuate attractive forces between crystallites.
Colloid Size Characterization and Control
Dynamic light
scattering (DLS) was used to probe the long-term stability of COF-5
colloidal suspensions and the effect of the polymerization conditions
on particle size. The average particle size and polydispersity index
were measured for reaction mixtures of varying monomer and CH3CN concentrations after their polymerization at 90 °C
for 20 h (Figure and Table S2). For all CH3CN concentrations
examined (15–95 vol % CH3CN), the colloids exhibit
Gaussian size distributions and low polydispersity indices. The average
particle size is relatively invariant at CH3CN concentrations
above 55 vol %, between 45–60 nm. This size is comparable to
the 20–40 nm crystallite sizes observed by powder X-ray diffraction
(PXRD) of COF-5 precipitates and suggests stabilization of discrete
crystallites at high CH3CN concentrations. Larger colloids
(100 and 240 nm) are obtained at 15 and 35 vol % CH3CN,
respectively. These larger particle sizes may originate from the aggregation
of discrete, smaller crystallites at lower CH3CN content,
which would represent a transition from insoluble material with no
added CH3CN to dispersed, smaller colloids at higher CH3CN content (Figure ). COF colloid growth conditions yield monodisperse particle
distributions, with DLS PDI < 0.2. The initial monomer concentration
has a minor influence on the particle size, with an average of 60
nm at 2 mM [HHTP]0 and 75 vol % CH3CN. This
average decreases to 40 nm at 1 mM [HHTP]0 under similar
reaction conditions (Figure B).
Figure 3
Average size of COF-5 colloidal nanoparticles prepared under different
reaction conditions, characterized by the DLS Z-average,
where error bars correspond to the polydispersity width. (A) Size
dependence as a function of the volume fraction of CH3CN
(remainder is 4:1 dioxane/mesitylene). (B) Size dependence as a function
of [HHTP]0 at 75% vol % CH3CN.
Average size of COF-5 colloidal nanoparticles prepared under different
reaction conditions, characterized by the DLS Z-average,
where error bars correspond to the polydispersity width. (A) Size
dependence as a function of the volume fraction of CH3CN
(remainder is 4:1 dioxane/mesitylene). (B) Size dependence as a function
of [HHTP]0 at 75% vol % CH3CN.Once formed at a given CH3CN concentration,
the colloids
are stable for at least one month at room temperature (Table S2). Furthermore, the particle sizes do
not change if the CH3CN concentration is varied after the
colloids have been formed. For example, 230 nm colloids formed at
15 vol % CH3CN do not shrink when additional CH3CN is added to the solution. Likewise, 50 nm colloids do not increase
in size when diluted by non-nitrile containing cosolvents, even upon
heating at 90 °C (Figure S6). These
experiments demonstrate that COF colloids are stable and robust once
formed. Therefore, the particles are likely not in rapid equilibrium
but rather kinetically trapped without appreciable monomer exchange.
This suggests that crystallite size limitation in COF growth is not
due to precipitation, but rather a lack of Oswald ripening postnucleation.
Colloid stability provides the opportunity to explore a variety of
postsynthetic processing to characterize and control overall morphology.To further explore the size of colloidal particles, solvated colloidal
nanoparticles were dried and analyzed by atomic force microscopy (AFM).
COF-5 colloids are readily drop cast onto mica, yielding discrete
surface-adsorbed species (Figure ). COF nanoparticles size trends are consistent with
DLS measurements, with smaller particles observed at CH3CN solvent levels >55%. In particular, average heights at 95%
CH3CN are <6 nm, suggesting few-layer thick COF domains.
The
nanoparticle shape at low CH3CN vol % (<55%) is consistent
with crystallite aggregation (Figures A and S7). In general, particle
heights are comparable to but smaller than the solvated sizes obtained
by DLS (Figure C).
Size distributions by AFM also show a narrow dispersity. Collectively,
the size, shape, and surface density results suggest that the larger
particles observed at low CH3CN concentrations are aggregates
of the growing crystallites, whose aggregation is inhibited at higher
CH3CN concentrations.
Figure 4
COF-5 colloidal nanoparticles, size characterized
by AFM. (A) Example
COF-5 nanoparticles (35% CH3CN). (B) Example COF-5 nanoparticles
(75% CH3CN). (C) Particle height as a function of solvent
CH3CN percent, where the error bar indicates the Gaussian
fit RMS width.
COF-5 colloidal nanoparticles, size characterized
by AFM. (A) Example
COF-5 nanoparticles (35% CH3CN). (B) Example COF-5 nanoparticles
(75% CH3CN). (C) Particle height as a function of solvent
CH3CN percent, where the error bar indicates the Gaussian
fit RMS width.
Liquid-Cell Transmission
Electron Microscopy
We correlate
the bulk particle-size characterization of COF colloid growth/stabilization
with VT-LCTEM, whereby we image/video individual nanoparticles in
real-time under the polymerization conditions. First, we performed
electron-beam sensitivity and damage tests of the COF precursor solutions
(see Supporting Information), which indicated
that the solution is electron beam sensitive at elevated temperatures
(i.e., conditions at which COF growth is initiated). The precursor
solutions were found to be comparatively stable at room temperature
under low/modest electron dose rates (Figure S11, Figure S12, and Table S3).[27−30] No COF nanostructure nucleation
or growth is observed during prolonged, continuous illumination at
27 °C (no radiolysis-induced growth). However, continuous e– illumination influences the thermally activated COF
nanostructure growth once the temperature of the liquid-cell has been
heated above 80 °C (Video S2 and Figures S13 and S14). Because of the acute sensitivity
of the solution to radiolysis damage at elevated temperatures, we
employ time-lapse VT-LCTEM, whereby single snapshot images are periodically
acquired, with the beam off between acquiring images, instead of continuous
video (Figure , Figure S17 and Table S4).
Figure 5
VT-LCTEM experiment.
(A) Time series of bright-field LCTEM images
as a COF precursor solution (55 vol % CH3CN) is heated
to 80 °C. The first frame is the COF precursor solution at room
temperature (no nanostructures), and subsequent frames show a region
of interest upon heating the solution to 80 °C using on-chip
in situ variable-temperature control. (B) Discrete particle diameter,
as measured from each LCTEM image using multiobject image analysis.
The average particle size (red square) is ∼15–20 nm,
which is reached within 10 min at 80 °C. These particle sizes
remain stable over extended time periods at 80 °C. Error bars
indicate standard error (narrow particle-size distribution, ∼
±3 nm).
VT-LCTEM experiment.
(A) Time series of bright-field LCTEM images
as a COF precursor solution (55 vol % CH3CN) is heated
to 80 °C. The first frame is the COF precursor solution at room
temperature (no nanostructures), and subsequent frames show a region
of interest upon heating the solution to 80 °C using on-chip
in situ variable-temperature control. (B) Discrete particle diameter,
as measured from each LCTEM image using multiobject image analysis.
The average particle size (red square) is ∼15–20 nm,
which is reached within 10 min at 80 °C. These particle sizes
remain stable over extended time periods at 80 °C. Error bars
indicate standard error (narrow particle-size distribution, ∼
±3 nm).The average discrete
colloidal particle size (17.5 ± 3.5 nm
diameter) directly measured by LCTEM imaging (Figure and Figure S17) is consistent with the particle size calculated from the in situ
SAXS/WAXS bulk-scattering data (Figure ) obtained after 20 min at 90 °C (35 nm diameter).
The discrete VT-LCTEM-formed nanoparticles match the COF-5 particles
grown via bulk-solution synthesis with respect to their average size
and rounded morphology (Figure S15). However,
the average VT-LCTEM particle-size remains constant over time at elevated
temperatures, while the particle size measured by SAXS/WAXS increases
for the first few hours before plateauing at ∼60 nm diameter
(2 h at 90 °C). This discrepancy might arise from differences
in how these measurements are conducted (analysis of reaction aliquots
compared with particles adhered to the windows of a microfluidic setup)
and will be investigated further in future experiments. The uniform,
radial growth of individual seed particles without particle–particle
coalescence or ripening, as well as the time-lapse image-series of
the size-stabilized, discrete particles (Figure and Figure S17) suggest that COF-5 nanoparticles grow by monomers or oligomers
adding to particles attached to the TEM window. Similar behavior was
observed in the room temperature growth of mesoporous MOF nanoparticles
(zeolitic imidazolate framework-8, ZIF-8).[31] The continued development of low-dose methods is needed to enable
continuous VT-LCTEM imaging, as many other systems of interest are
likely to experience similarly increased sensitivity to beam damage
at elevated temperatures.
Solution Casting of Freestanding COF Films
These stable
colloidal suspensions of COFs offer a new means to process these materials
into thin films from solution, in contrast to the poor processability
of the microcrystalline powder form. 2DCOFs can be obtained as thin
films by including a substrate in the polymerization mixture.[16,32,33] However, this practice requires
that the substrate to be compatible with the polymerization conditions
and is inherently inefficient—most of the building blocks lost
to the powder form. In contrast, the solution casting of COF colloids
represents an efficient means to form free-standing films of controlled
size and thickness. COF-5 films were obtained by evaporating solvent
from a colloidal suspension at 90 °C, resulting in a translucent
material upon near-complete evaporation (Figure ). Films >10 μm in thickness are
readily
obtained, which delaminated from the glass substrate to provide a
freestanding, brittle film. Films generated this way retain the crystallinity
of the original colloidal solution, as determined by PXRD (Figure S10). The COF-5 film had a BET surface
area of 840 m2/g, as determined by N2 adsorption
(Figure ), compared
to ca. 2000 m2/g for the highest reported microcrystalline
powders.[19] Nonlocal density functional
theory (NLDFT) analysis indicated the expected pore size of 2.5 nm,
consistent with COF-5 nanocrystalline powders.
Figure 6
(A) Solution casting
of colloid yields a coherent, free-standing
COF film. (B) Optical image of transparent freestanding COF-5 film.
(C) SEM of freestanding film.
(A) Solution casting
of colloid yields a coherent, free-standing
COF film. (B) Optical image of transparent freestanding COF-5 film.
(C) SEM of freestanding film.The free-standing COF film exhibited a preferential orientation
opposite to that of films grown directly on the substrate, as determined
by grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GI-XRD). COF-5 film displays
increased electron density near Q∥ = 0 for peaks corresponding to <100>, <110>, and <200>
diffractions (Figure C). Moreover, the <001> diffraction, corresponding to interlayer
stacking of the 2DCOF sheets, shows decreased electron density near Q∥ = 0. These observations indicate a
crystallite preferred orientation with stacking direction of the 2D
sheets perpendicular to the plane of the film. In contrast, COF films
grown on graphene or other substrates are typically vertically oriented,
with the stacking direction normal to the substrate.[16] Thus, the printing of colloid films through solution casting
yields a structural morphology dramatically different from surface-supported
thin film growth. Such orientations are of interest for applications
in which charge or molecular transport occurs parallel to a substrate,
such as transistors or microfluidic devices. Through the further study
of the film aggregation mechanism, established rules for targeting
either pore arrangement will provide increased control over COF morphology
and expand the scope of accessible applications.
Figure 7
Characterization of freestanding
COF-5 film prepared from 55% vol
% CH3CN conditions. (A) Nitrogen absorption surface area.
(B) NLDFT pore size distribution. (C–D) GI-XRD showing preferred
crystallite orientation data. (E) Projection of film diffraction near Q∥ = 0. (F) Illustration of the preferred
orientation of COF pores parallel to the film plane.
Characterization of freestanding
COF-5 film prepared from 55% vol
% CH3CN conditions. (A) Nitrogen absorption surface area.
(B) NLDFT pore size distribution. (C–D) GI-XRD showing preferred
crystallite orientation data. (E) Projection of film diffraction near Q∥ = 0. (F) Illustration of the preferred
orientation of COF pores parallel to the film plane.
Conclusion
Nitrile-functionalized
cosolvents profoundly change boronate ester-linked
COFpolymerizations to provide colloidal suspensions instead of insoluble
microcrystalline powders. The colloids remain dispersed in the growth
solvent for at least one month with no evidence of aggregation. In
situ SAXS/WAXS analysis indicated that the colloids show the expected
crystalline 2D lattices from the earliest measurable time points with
complementary VT-LCTEM experiments confirming the growth kinetics
and morphology of the resulting nanoparticles. These stable colloidal
suspensions can be used as an ink to solution process COF films, which
show preferred orientation opposite those of films grown directly
on substrates. The films retain their crystallinity and much of the
permanent porosity. As such, these findings represent an important
development for the convenient solution processing of polymers with
2D topologies. One of the most important challenges in the synthesis
of COFs is to increase the average crystallite size and understand
their nucleation and growth processes rigorously. Further study of
COF colloid formation and growth will address these questions.
Authors: Christian J Doonan; David J Tranchemontagne; T Grant Glover; Joseph R Hunt; Omar M Yaghi Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2010-02-07 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Catherine R DeBlase; Kenneth Hernández-Burgos; Katharine E Silberstein; Gabriel G Rodríguez-Calero; Ryan P Bisbey; Héctor D Abruña; William R Dichtel Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Brian J Smith; Nicky Hwang; Anton D Chavez; Jennifer L Novotney; William R Dichtel Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Derrick Tarn; Carlee E Ashley; Min Xue; Eric C Carnes; Jeffrey I Zink; C Jeffrey Brinker Journal: Acc Chem Res Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 22.384
Authors: Patricia Abellan; Lucas R Parent; Naila Al Hasan; Chiwoo Park; Ilke Arslan; Ayman M Karim; James E Evans; Nigel D Browning Journal: Langmuir Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 3.882
Authors: Catherine R DeBlase; Katharine E Silberstein; Thanh-Tam Truong; Héctor D Abruña; William R Dichtel Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Ioannina Castano; Austin M Evans; Roberto Dos Reis; Vinayak P Dravid; Nathan C Gianneschi; William R Dichtel Journal: Chem Mater Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 9.811
Authors: Liang Yao; Andrés Rodríguez-Camargo; Meng Xia; David Mücke; Roman Guntermann; Yongpeng Liu; Lars Grunenberg; Alberto Jiménez-Solano; Sebastian T Emmerling; Viola Duppel; Kevin Sivula; Thomas Bein; Haoyuan Qi; Ute Kaiser; Michael Grätzel; Bettina V Lotsch Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 16.383
Authors: Evangelos Bakalis; Lucas R Parent; Maria Vratsanos; Chiwoo Park; Nathan C Gianneschi; Francesco Zerbetto Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Guomin Zhu; Maria L Sushko; John S Loring; Benjamin A Legg; Miao Song; Jennifer A Soltis; Xiaopeng Huang; Kevin M Rosso; James J De Yoreo Journal: Nature Date: 2021-02-17 Impact factor: 69.504
Authors: Ming Gong; Zhi Cao; Wei Liu; Eva M Nichols; Peter T Smith; Jeffrey S Derrick; Yi-Sheng Liu; Jinjia Liu; Xiaodong Wen; Christopher J Chang Journal: ACS Cent Sci Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 14.553