Ming Gong1,2, Zhi Cao1, Wei Liu1,1, Eva M Nichols1,2, Peter T Smith1, Jeffrey S Derrick1,2, Yi-Sheng Liu2, Jinjia Liu3, Xiaodong Wen3,4, Christopher J Chang1,2,1,1. 1. Department of Chemistry, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States. 2. Chemical Sciences Division and The Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States. 3. Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, China. 4. Synfuels China, Beijing, 100195, China.
Abstract
Conversion of carbon monoxide (CO), a major one-carbon product of carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction, into value-added multicarbon species is a challenge to addressing global energy demands and climate change. Here we report a modular synthetic approach for aqueous electrochemical CO reduction to carbon-carbon coupled products via self-assembly of supramolecular cages at molecular-materials interfaces. Heterobimetallic cavities formed by face-to-face coordination of thiol-terminated metalloporphyrins to copper electrodes through varying organic struts convert CO to C2 products with high faradaic efficiency (FE = 83% total with 57% to ethanol) and current density (1.34 mA/cm2) at a potential of -0.40 V vs RHE. The cage-functionalized electrodes offer an order of magnitude improvement in both selectivity and activity for electrocatalytic carbon fixation compared to parent copper surfaces or copper functionalized with porphyrins in an edge-on orientation.
Conversion of carbon monoxide (CO), a major one-carbon product of carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction, into value-added multicarbon species is a challenge to addressing global energy demands and climate change. Here we report a modular synthetic approach for aqueous electrochemical CO reduction to carbon-carbon coupled products via self-assembly of supramolecular cages at molecular-materials interfaces. Heterobimetallic cavities formed by face-to-face coordination of thiol-terminated metalloporphyrins to copper electrodes through varying organic struts convert CO to C2 products with high faradaic efficiency (FE = 83% total with 57% to ethanol) and current density (1.34 mA/cm2) at a potential of -0.40 V vs RHE. The cage-functionalized electrodes offer an order of magnitude improvement in both selectivity and activity for electrocatalytic carbon fixation compared to parent copper surfaces or copper functionalized with porphyrins in an edge-on orientation.
Climate change and rising global energy
demands motivate broad
interest in carbon fixation to value-added products with formation
of carbon–carbon bonds.[1−6] In this context, carbon monoxide (CO) is a common one-carbon product
of carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction[7−27] and major feedstock for producing multicarbon products as illustrated
by the classic Fischer–Tropsch process.[28,29] Electrochemical CO reduction offers a complementary approach to
C–C coupling reactivity with sustainable energy input,[30−33] where reducing hydrogen equivalents can be provided directly by
aqueous electrolytes and thus bypass the traditionally energy-intensive
steam reforming process for H2 production. Reports of electrochemical
CO reduction are exceedingly rare relative to CO2 reduction
and have focused largely on copper, which can reduce CO to C2 products
including ethanol, acetate, and ethylene; however, conventional Cu
electrodes show poor selectivity for CO over proton reduction and
low energetic efficiency.[33] Elegant work
by Kanan et al. has utilized grain boundaries to improve CO over H+ selectivity on nanocrystalline Cu materials,[30−32] but optimizing CO electroreduction catalysts at a molecular level
to attain both high specificity and activity remains a significant
challenge. In this regard, Nature provides inspiration for CO catalysis
in the form of CO dehydrogenase enzymes (CODHs),[34−38] which drive efficient CO catalysis through self-assembly
of heterobimetallic cavities (e.g., NiFe or MoCu) with pendant electron
reservoirs.Against this backdrop, we sought to synthesize electrocatalysts
for CO reduction that could combine these key bioinorganic features
yet allow for molecular-level tunability. We now report a supramolecular
approach to CO electrocatalysis in which heterobimetallic cages can
be assembled directly at molecular–materials interfaces from
systematically tunable building blocks. Specifically, we show that
metalloporphyrins bearing thiol-terminated organic struts form synthetic
cavities of predictable sizes and metal–metal distances upon
cofacial interactions with Cu electrodes, enabling electrochemical
CO reduction with high selectivity and activity for C2 products (Figure ). In addition to
introducing interfacial supramolecular chemistry as a versatile design
principle for an important catalytic carbon fixation process, this
work provides a starting point for merging molecular and materials
catalyst components through supramolecular self-assembly for a broader
range of chemical transformations and applications.
Figure 1
Schematic illustration
of traditional supramolecular assembly of
cages between molecular components and supramolecular assembly of
cages between molecular and materials components, as illustrated by
formation of porphyrin cages on electrode surfaces.
Schematic illustration
of traditional supramolecular assembly of
cages between molecular components and supramolecular assembly of
cages between molecular and materials components, as illustrated by
formation of porphyrin cages on electrode surfaces.
Results and Discussion
Design, Synthesis, and
Characterization of Porphyrin Caps for
Formation of Supramolecular Cages at Molecule–Materials Interfaces
The design and synthesis of cage-forming porphyrin caps and their
assembly onto metal surfaces are depicted in Figure and Scheme . We reasoned that α,α,α,α-atropisomers
inspired by the classic picket-fence porphyrin model for hemoglobin
oxygen transport[39] would provide a rigid
platform to promote a face-to-face arrangement between the porphyrin
molecule and metal surface, where thiol-terminated legs built off
of the porphyrin scaffold at the ortho positions of the 5,10,15,20
aryl groups serve as multidentate connecting points to bind to the
copper electrode material. Self-assembly at the molecular–materials
interface would form a cage in which the porphyrin sits like a molecular
table on top of the metal surface floor (Figure ). Accordingly, systematic variation of linkers
and metals in both the molecular and materials components of this
supramolecular assembly provides an opportunity to explore and optimize
catalytic structures and properties. This hybrid approach, where interfacial
supramolecular architectures are derived from both molecular and materials
building blocks, is complementary to discrete molecular organic cages[40−44] as well as extended porous materials bearing catalytic porphyrin
units.[23,45−50]
Scheme 1
A. Synthetic Procedures for the Preparation of Thiolate-Containing
Porphyrins. B. Structures of Porphyrins
Used in This Study
(i) Acetic acid, reflux, 1
h; (ii) SnCl2, 12 N HCl, 65°C; (iii) silica gel, benzene,
80 °C, 20 h; (iv) n = 1, bromoacetyl bromide; n = 2, 3-bromopropionyl bromide; n = 3,
4-chlorobutyryl chloride; n = 4, 5-chlorovaleroyl
chloride; (v) KSAc, THF, 4 h; (vi) MCl2 (M= Fe, Zn, and
Ni), 2,6-lutidine, THF.
A. Synthetic Procedures for the Preparation of Thiolate-Containing
Porphyrins. B. Structures of Porphyrins
Used in This Study
(i) Acetic acid, reflux, 1
h; (ii) SnCl2, 12 N HCl, 65°C; (iii) silica gel, benzene,
80 °C, 20 h; (iv) n = 1, bromoacetyl bromide; n = 2, 3-bromopropionyl bromide; n = 3,
4-chlorobutyryl chloride; n = 4, 5-chlorovaleroyl
chloride; (v) KSAc, THF, 4 h; (vi) MCl2 (M= Fe, Zn, and
Ni), 2,6-lutidine, THF.A general route to
the syntheses of α,α,α,α-porphyrins
and their metalated derivatives is shown in Scheme A. Scheme B depicts the molecular structures and nomenclatures
of the synthesized (metallo)porphyrins along with two porphyrin analogues
employed as controls.[51,52] In particular, we synthesized
an isostructural α,α,α,α-porphyrin with legs
that lack terminal thiol pendants for surface binding, as well as
a para-substituted tetrathiol porphyrin congener designed to favor
edge-on rather than face-to-face interactions with the metal surface.
Full synthetic details are given in the Supporting Information.To generate hybrid supramolecular cages
at the molecular–materials
interface, metallic copper surfaces were treated with thiol porphyrins
generated from in situ deprotection of thioacetate counterparts (Figure a).[53] Well-defined metallic Cu films prepared by e-beam evaporation
were utilized as model substrates for surface characterization.[54] The successful attachment of the porphyrins
to the Cu surface was first evidenced by high-resolution N 1s and
S 2p X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The N 1s peak is consistent
with a previously reported spectrum assigned to a porphyrin monolayer,
confirming the existence of porphyrins on the surface (Figure b).[55,56] The S 2p region exhibits two distinct peaks at around ∼161–164
eV and ∼167–169 eV, corresponding to the thiolate and
sulfonate species, respectively (Figure c).[54] The presence
of thiolate species on the surface corroborates possible porphyrin
attachment via formation of Cu–S bonds, whereas the sulfonate
peaks might be derived from partial thiolate oxidation after air exposure
due to the high oxygen permeability of the void spaces in the porphyrin
cages. The functionalized Cu surface also shows a slightly wider Cu
2p peak but with lower signal at ∼933 eV compared to the unfunctionalized
Cu control surface (Figure S1), which can
be reasoned by the surface-attached porphyrin partially oxidizing
the Cu surface via Cu–S bond formation. Complementary external
reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) measurements
provide addition support for porphyrin attachment (Figure S2).
Figure 2
(a) Schematic illustration of the functionalization of
Cu surfaces
with porphyrin cages. (i) NH3 in methanol/chloroform, 25
°C, 4 h; (ii) sodium borohydride, DMF, 25 °C, 12 h. (b)
High resolution N 1s and (c) S 2p XPS spectra of 100 nm Cu on Si wafer
functionalizated with porphyrin cages. (d) Cyclic voltammetry curves
of underpotential deposition of Pb on Cu (black), Cu tethered with
alkene-terminated porphyrins (dashed blue), and Cu tethered with thiol-terminated
porphyrins (red). The scan rate is 10 mV/s.
(a) Schematic illustration of the functionalization of
Cu surfaces
with porphyrin cages. (i) NH3 in methanol/chloroform, 25
°C, 4 h; (ii) sodium borohydride, DMF, 25 °C, 12 h. (b)
High resolution N 1s and (c) S 2p XPS spectra of 100 nm Cu on Si wafer
functionalizated with porphyrin cages. (d) Cyclic voltammetry curves
of underpotential deposition of Pb on Cu (black), Cu tethered with
alkene-terminated porphyrins (dashed blue), and Cu tethered with thiol-terminated
porphyrins (red). The scan rate is 10 mV/s.Two potential limiting configurations for porphyrin coordination
to the Cu surface may be envisioned, which are anticipated to lead
to disparate catalytic performances. In one possible configuration,
the porphyrin coordinates with the Cu surface via Cu–S interactions
to form a cage architecture where the porphyrin face is elevated above
the surface. Another possibility is for the porphyrin face to lie
directly on the Cu surface through van der Waals interactions, blocking
potential access of reactants to the surface. To investigate these
possible binding modes, we employed electrochemical underpotential
deposition (UPD) studies, in which the measured monolayer thickness
of a metal-deposited guest is highly indicative of the number of surface
substrate sites that are electrochemically accessible.[57] Porphyrins that orient face-down and promote
direct interactions with the Cu surface would block the electrode
and result in fewer Cu sites able to be accessed by UPD. In contrast,
porphyrins that orient with legs down and favor coordination through
Cu–S bonds to create porous cages would leave more Cu sites
accessible to the electrolyte solution, resulting in UPD peak areas
that are comparable to control Cu surfaces.To this end, we
probed accessible Cu sites by the UPD of lead (Pb)
on Cu surfaces in the presence of chloride anions. The standard Cu
surfaces (100 nm Cu on Si) show a pair of underpotential deposition
and dissolution peaks in the range of −0.05 V to −0.25
V vs standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) (Figure d).[58] Treating
the Cu surfaces with H2PAA porphyrins bearing terminal
alkene groups shows voltammograms that exhibit smaller peak areas
with retained peak shapes and potentials, likely due to the inability
of the alkenes to form stable interactions with the Cu surface and
possible porphyrin–Cu stacking behavior, both of which would
impede Pb deposition. In contrast, the Cu surfaces functionalized
with H2PC2SH porphyrins bearing terminal thiol
groups exhibit almost identical peak areas to control Cu (Figure d), showing that
porphyrins interacting in this mode do not restrict access to the
Cu electrode. Interestingly, the thiol-porphyrin-functionalized Cu
surfaces also exhibit a distinct peak shift to more positive potentials,
indicating more facile Pb deposition with this molecular attachment
(Figure d). Taken
together, the data suggest that the local electronic structure of
the Cu surface has been altered after porphyrin binding, likely due
to the partial oxidation of the surface as a result of the formation
of Cu–S bonds. The UPD results also imply a high coverage of
the porphyrin molecules on the Cu surface since no UPD current is
observed at the potential characteristic for unfunctionalized Cu surfaces.
The observations from UPD and XPS studies both support the creation
of porphyrin cages on a sterically accessible metallic Cu surface
via designed Cu–S interactions.
Electrocatalytic CO Reduction
with Hybrid Supramolecular Porphyrin
Cages Formed on Copper
With these initial hybrid systems
in hand, we evaluated their activity for electrocatalytic CO reduction
compared to unfunctionalized Cu foils (Figure ). To compare catalytic activity and selectivity,
with particular interest in C–C coupled products, controlled
potential electrolysis (CPE) measurements at various potentials were
carried out in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). The collected gas-phase
products were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC), and the liquid-phase
products were quantified by 1H NMR (Figure S3). Three major C2 products derived from C–C
bond formation—acetate, ethanol, and ethylene—were detected
for all electrodes in the potential range of −0.45 V to −0.65
V vs reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE). The faradaic efficiencies
(FEs) and specific current densities for each product are shown for
direct comparison (Figure ). As expected, Cu foil alone exhibits low basal activity,
with <15% total FE toward CO reduction at relatively low overpotentials
(<−0.6 V vs RHE) (Figures a–3d and Figure S4) and an appreciable amount of ethylene
as the major product of CO reduction beyond −0.6 V vs RHE,
consistent with previous reports (Figures e and 3f).[30,33]
Figure 3
Faradaic
efficiencies of CO reduction into (a) acetate, (c) ethanol,
and (e) ethylene under different potentials on Cu foil and Cu-H2PC2SH in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). Specific
current densities of CO reduction into (b) acetate, (d) ethanol, and
(f) ethylene under different potentials on Cu foil and Cu-H2PC2SH in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq).
Faradaic
efficiencies of CO reduction into (a) acetate, (c) ethanol,
and (e) ethylene under different potentials on Cu foil and Cu-H2PC2SH in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). Specific
current densities of CO reduction into (b) acetate, (d) ethanol, and
(f) ethylene under different potentials on Cu foil and Cu-H2PC2SH in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq).We next evaluated the effects of porphyrin functionalization
as
well as cage size on CO reduction to C–C coupled products by
systematically varying the linker lengths in the spacer region (H2PCSH, n = 1–4). Interestingly,
all Cu foils with surface-tethered porphyrins exhibit significantly
higher propensities for oxygenate formation (Figure ). Specifically, an optimal CO reduction
selectivity toward oxygenate production was obtained with the two-carbon
linker at a potential of −0.55 V vs RHE (Figure b). Further expanding the cage size (n = 3, 4) results in a notable decrease in the FEs toward
C2 oxygenates. We then compared the activity and selectivity of the
optimized Cu-H2PC2SH electrode with bare Cu
foil under different potentials, and the results show significantly
higher FEs and more positive onset potentials for C2 oxygenate formation.
More negative applied potentials greatly influence the observed FEs,
resulting in reduced amounts of acetate and ethanol production while
boosting undesired competitive hydrogen evolution. In contrast, almost
identical FEs and current densities were observed on Cu foil and Cu-H2PC2SH electrodes for the production of ethylene
(Figures e and 3f), suggesting that the surface-tethered porphyrin
cages affect the reduction pathways toward C2 oxygenate products but
not the reduction pathway to this C2 hydrocarbon.
Figure 4
(a) Schematic illustration
of free-base porphyrins possessing different
linker lengths. (b) Faradaic efficiencies for CO reduction on Cu foils
functionalized with free-base porphyrins possessing different linker
lengths (Cu-H2PCSH). The electrolyses
were performed at a constant potential of −0.55 V vs RHE in
CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq).
(a) Schematic illustration
of free-base porphyrins possessing different
linker lengths. (b) Faradaic efficiencies for CO reduction on Cu foils
functionalized with free-base porphyrins possessing different linker
lengths (Cu-H2PCSH). The electrolyses
were performed at a constant potential of −0.55 V vs RHE in
CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq).To further probe the nature of the observed enhancements
in CO
selectivity enabled by supramolecular formation of porphyrin cages
on Cu surfaces, we designed a series of control molecules to investigate
the roles of these surface-tethered porphyrin caps. Cu surfaces functionalized
with simple monothiol additives such as 1-dodecanethiol (C12SH), which support conventional self-assembled monolayers (SAMs),[54] or with 3-mercapto-N-phenylpropanamide
(3-MPPA), which mimics a single linker arm in H2PC2SH porphyrins with a pendant amide, were first utilized as
thiolate analogues for comparison. The Cu-C12SH electrode
exhibits dramatically lowered current densities compared to Cu-H2PC2SH, with hydrogen (H2) as the only
major product generated at a potential of −0.55 V vs RHE (Figure a and Figure S5). We speculate that this low activity
for CO reduction is likely the result of the large energy barrier
for diffusing polar CO molecules into the densely packed nonpolar
SAMs. Along the same lines, Cu-3-MPPA exhibits lower overall current
densities compared to Cu-tethered thiolporphyrins and a characteristic
CPE curve with an initial drop followed by a gradual recovery in current
density similar to Cu-H2PC2SH electrode (Figure a and Figure S5). However, the selectivity for this
MPPA system toward CO reduction is low, reaching only a ∼10%
total FE for carbon products (Figure a). Moreover, the para-functionalized porphyrin analogue
(Cu-H2-p-PC2SH) also exhibits
significantly lower selectivity toward CO reduction compared to the
table-like ortho analogue Cu-H2-o-PC2SH (Figure a). We speculate that the para porphyrins having a flat architecture
would either pack by standing edge-on the Cu surfaces via one or two
thiolate linkages or lie flat on the surface with direct face-to-face
stacking; in either case, these porphyrins are incapable of forming
catalytic cages and serve to block accessible Cu sites, thereby lowering
electrocatalytic activity and CO selectivity. Finally, the Cu-H2PAA system bearing terminal alkenes that do not strongly bind
copper, mentioned above for UPD studies, exhibits a similar product
distribution to bare Cu surfaces (Figure a) and reduced surface access as measured
by UPD (Figure d).
Figure 5
(a) Specific
faradaic efficiencies of CO reduction on Cu-H2PC2SH in comparison with Cu foil and other control
groups. 1: Cu + H2PC2SH. 2: Cu + C12SH. 3: Cu + 3-MMPA. 4: Cu + H2PAA. 5: Cu + H2-p-PC2SH. The electrolysis was performed
at a constant potential of −0.55 V vs RHE in CO-saturated 0.1
M KOH (aq). (b) DFT calculation of a speculative ketene intermediate
within the porphyrin cage formed on Cu(100) surfaces, which identifies
a potential rationalization for differences in CO reduction selectivity
for different cage sizes but does not rule out other plausible mechanistic
possibilities.
(a) Specific
faradaic efficiencies of CO reduction on Cu-H2PC2SH in comparison with Cu foil and other control
groups. 1: Cu + H2PC2SH. 2: Cu + C12SH. 3: Cu + 3-MMPA. 4: Cu + H2PAA. 5: Cu + H2-p-PC2SH. The electrolysis was performed
at a constant potential of −0.55 V vs RHE in CO-saturated 0.1
M KOH (aq). (b) DFT calculation of a speculative ketene intermediate
within the porphyrin cage formed on Cu(100) surfaces, which identifies
a potential rationalization for differences in CO reduction selectivity
for different cage sizes but does not rule out other plausible mechanistic
possibilities.The foregoing results
establish that the supramolecular cavity
created by the rigid table-like porphyrin scaffold plays a central
role in enhancing the selectivity for electrochemical CO reduction
to value-added C2 products and over competing water reduction, whereas
traditional architectures for molecular functionalization of surfaces
through metal–thiol interactions are not beneficial due to
the lack of accessible sites on the Cu electrodes. Density functional
theory (DFT) calculations on a Cu(100) surface point to a tentative
mechanistic proposal involving a ketene intermediate,[59,60] which we speculate may be tuned through hydrogen-bond interactions
with the porphyrin cap (Figure b and Table S1). Such interactions
could rationalize the observed differences in selectivity for CO reduction
observed for varying cage sizes but do not rule out other plausible
mechanistic possibilities, and further studies must be pursued to
address this open question.The stability of the porphyrin cages
on the Cu surfaces was further
investigated by UPD and XPS studies (Figure S6). Cu-H2PC2SH electrode shows a consistent
positive shift of the UPD peak by ∼14 mV compared to the unfunctionalized
control Cu electrode. This positive shift is retained after electrolysis,
suggesting the persistence of the porphyrin cages on Cu surfaces under
CO electroreduction conditions (Figure S6a,b). XPS measurements reveal slight decreases of N 1s and S 2p XPS
signals and an increase of Cu 2p XPS signal after electrolysis, indicating
some loss of weakly bound porphyrin cages during electrocatalysis
(Figure S6c–e), but the retained
N 1s and S 2p peaks still suggest the relatively high stability of
the porphyrin cages for CO reduction.
Heterobimetallic Supramolecular
Porphyrin Cages for Improved
CO Reduction Reactivity
In addition to enforcing a rigid
cage to maintain surface accessibility as well as orient hydrogen-bond
pendants to influence reaction selectivity, the porphyrin caps also
enable facile introduction and tuning of a second metal site in proximity
to the metal electrode center. We anticipated that a second type of
metal center has the potential not only to participate as a catalytically
active site but also to contribute as a synergistic cofactor to increase
local CO concentrations and/or tune the electronic structure of the
metal surface for improved CO reduction activity. Indeed, metalloporphyrins
have been explored widely in homogeneous catalysis.[14,19,24,61−64] To this end, we screened a series of metals inserted into the two-carbon-linker
porphyrin caps (e.g., Fe, Ni, Zn) and observed that the introduction
of Fe centers in the porphyrins increases the preference for ethanol
production while decreasing the relative ratio of acetate at all potentials
applied (Figure a,b
and Figure S7). An optimal ethanolFE of
∼52% is obtained on a Cu-FePC2SH electrode at a
potential of −0.50 V vs RHE (Figure b) with good long-term stability over continuous
CO reduction electrocatalysis (Figure S8), only losing ca. 10% FE for C2 products over a 24 h period. As
expected, functionalization with the redox-inert Zn porphyrin shows
comparable product selectivity to that of free-base porphyrins. In
contrast, insertion of Ni into porphyrin cap shifts product distributions
toward hydrogen formation and a higher FE for ethylene, which may
likely be due to the high intrinsic hydrogenation capability of the
Ni porphyrins (Figure a).[65,66]
Figure 6
(a) Faradaic efficiencies for CO reduction on
Cu foils functionalized
with metalloporphyrins containing different metal centers (Cu-MPC2SH). The electrolysis was performed at a constant potential
of −0.55 V vs RHE in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). (b) Faradaic
efficiencies for CO reduction into ethanol under different potentials
with Cu-H2PC2SH and Cu-FePC2SH in
CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). (c) Faradaic efficiencies of acetaldehyde
reduction into ethanol on Cu foil, Cu-H2PC2SH,
and Cu-FePC2SH in Ar-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq) with 10 mM
acetaldehyde at a constant potential of −0.40 V vs RHE. (d)
Tafel plots of specific current densities of CO reduction into ethanol
on Cu, Cu-H2PC2SH, and Cu-FePC2SH
in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). (e) Specific faradaic efficiencies
and (f) specific current densities of CO reduction on electrodeposited
Cu functionalized with iron porphyrins (FePC2SH). The ethylene
current density corresponds to the right y-axis.
(a) Faradaic efficiencies for CO reduction on
Cu foils functionalized
with metalloporphyrins containing different metal centers (Cu-MPC2SH). The electrolysis was performed at a constant potential
of −0.55 V vs RHE in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). (b) Faradaic
efficiencies for CO reduction into ethanol under different potentials
with Cu-H2PC2SH and Cu-FePC2SH in
CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). (c) Faradaic efficiencies of acetaldehyde
reduction into ethanol on Cu foil, Cu-H2PC2SH,
and Cu-FePC2SH in Ar-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq) with 10 mM
acetaldehyde at a constant potential of −0.40 V vs RHE. (d)
Tafel plots of specific current densities of CO reduction into ethanol
on Cu, Cu-H2PC2SH, and Cu-FePC2SH
in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). (e) Specific faradaic efficiencies
and (f) specific current densities of CO reduction on electrodeposited
Cu functionalized with iron porphyrins (FePC2SH). The ethylene
current density corresponds to the right y-axis.With the observation of varying
product distributions with different
metal substitutions into the porphyrin cap, we next sought to probe
aspects of how the Fe derivative promotes higher levels of ethanol
production. In this context, previous studies have identified acetaldehyde
as a key intermediate for electrochemical CO reduction into ethanol
in alkaline media.[67] We thus utilized acetaldehyde
as a model substrate for studying the role of Fe in this catalytic
process. To this end, the electrocatalytic reductions of acetaldehyde
on bare Cu foil, Cu-H2PC2SH, and Cu-FePC2SH electrodes were examined in 0.1 M KOH (aq) with the addition
of 10 mM acetaldehyde under Ar atmosphere. The Cu-FePC2SH electrode shows slightly higher activity toward acetaldehyde reduction,
with a positive shift in the polarization curves (Figure S9) and much higher FEs toward ethanol production than
bare Cu surfaces or Cu functionalized with free-baseporphyrin caps
(Figure c). In fact,
Fe porphyrins alone deposited on glassy carbon electrodes show moderate
activity toward acetaldehyde reduction with a reasonable current density
within the potential range for CO reduction (Figure S9), which is consistent with previous findings that Fe porphyrins
can be effectively used as catalysts for the hydrogenation of various
aldehydes and ketones.[68] As such, we propose
that Fe porphyrins might participate in reduction of acetaldehyde
intermediates, which in turn favors increased ethanol production in
electrochemical CO reduction. Indeed, the Tafel plot of the specific
ethanol current densities on Cu-FePC2SH electrodes shows
a much earlier onset potential but exhibits a larger Tafel slope of
174 mV/dec (Figure d). This deviation from the Tafel slopes of 126 and 127 mV/dec observed
on Cu foil and on Cu-H2PC2SH electrodes, respectively,
supports the participation of Fe porphyrins in the rate-determining
step of the ethanol production pathway, with observation of a larger
Tafel slope for the Fe–Cu bimetallic system compared to Cu-only
congeners resulting from inefficiencies in charge transfer between
the Fe porphyrin and Cu surface. Evidence for this notion is provided
by the larger charge transfer resistance under CO atmosphere compared
to Ar (Figure S10), and future efforts
will aim to increase charge transfer efficiency.Finally, we
sought to optimize the CO reduction activity of these
hybrid heterobimetallic systems, using the Cu-FePC2SHporphyrin
catalyst showing the best product selectivity toward the liquid fuel
ethanol as a starting point. Previous work highlights the significance
of exposed Cu facets for electrochemical CO2 or CO reductions,[26,60,69−74] where Cu(100) or other high-energy facets are more active than the
thermodynamically more stable Cu(111) surfaces and can enhance formation
of CO dimerized products.[26,60,71,73,75,76] We employed electrodeposition of Cu on glassy
carbon in chloride-containing aqueous CuSO4 electrolyte
as a general and facile way of controlling the exposed facets of the
Cu substrates.[77,78] The supramolecular catalyst systems
formed by combination of the FePC2SHporphyrin caps with
electrodeposited Cu exhibit markedly higher specific current densities
at low overpotentials (Figure f). The CO reduction product distribution is relatively similar
to that of Fe porphyrin cages on Cu foils, but with slightly lower
FEs for hydrogen production (Figure e). The higher current densities allow for quantitative
analyses of the products at even lower overpotentials where competitive
hydrogen evolution is insignificant. Specifically, at −0.4
V vs RHE, the catalyst achieves a total FE of 83% toward CO reduction
into C2 products, with 57% FE for ethanol and 24% FE for acetate at
a current density of 1.34 mA/cm2 (Figure e).
Conclusions
In
summary, we have presented a supramolecular strategy for electrocatalytic
carbon fixation to multicarbon products through the self-assembly
of synthetic cages at molecular–materials interfaces. Porphyrin
capping units with directional legs terminated by thiol ligands form
face-to-face cavities upon binding copper electrodes that leave surface
sites electrochemically accessible. Varying linker lengths as well
as metal substitutions in the porphyrin core provide versatile molecular
handles for tuning selectivity and activity for electrochemical CO
reduction to carbon–carbon coupled products. The heterobimetallic molecular materials formed by assembly of the
C2-linked Fe porphyrin derivative on Cu achieve up to 83% FE for CO
reduction into C2 products, with up to 57% ethanol and 24% acetate
generated at −0.4 V vs RHE and a current density of 1.34 mA/cm2. These values represent an order of magnitude improvement
over unfunctionalized copper electrodes. Further experiments suggest
that the Fe center can aid in cooperative reduction of potential acetaldehyde
intermediates. Moreover, control analogues that lack thiol binding
groups as well as positional isomers favoring edge-on binding or direct
van der Waals stacking exhibit reduced surface access and negligible
CO over water reduction selectivity, pointing to a critical role for
the three-dimensional pocket in catalysis. In addition to establishing
a unique electrochemical platform for reducing CO to value-added C2
oxygenates, this work provides a starting point for the design of
supramolecular architectures at molecular–materials interfaces
for a broader range of chemical transformations and applications of
interest.
Authors: Chang Yeon Lee; Omar K Farha; Bong Jin Hong; Amy A Sarjeant; SonBinh T Nguyen; Joseph T Hupp Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Matthew P McLaughlin; Marius Retegan; Eckhard Bill; Thomas M Payne; Hannah S Shafaat; Salvador Peña; Jawahar Sudhamsu; Amy A Ensign; Brian R Crane; Frank Neese; Patrick L Holland Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-11-20 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Brian A Rosen; Amin Salehi-Khojin; Michael R Thorson; Wei Zhu; Devin T Whipple; Paul J A Kenis; Richard I Masel Journal: Science Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Arnau Verdaguer-Casadevall; Christina W Li; Tobias P Johansson; Soren B Scott; Joseph T McKeown; Mukul Kumar; Ifan E L Stephens; Matthew W Kanan; Ib Chorkendorff Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Yanyan Zhao; Xingxu Yan; Ke R Yang; Sufeng Cao; Qi Dong; James E Thorne; Kelly L Materna; Shasha Zhu; Xiaoqing Pan; Maria Flytzani-Stephanopoulos; Gary W Brudvig; Victor S Batista; Dunwei Wang Journal: ACS Cent Sci Date: 2018-07-25 Impact factor: 14.553