Literature DB >> 28979945

Supramolecular Porphyrin Cages Assembled at Molecular-Materials Interfaces for Electrocatalytic CO Reduction.

Ming Gong1,2, Zhi Cao1, Wei Liu1,1, Eva M Nichols1,2, Peter T Smith1, Jeffrey S Derrick1,2, Yi-Sheng Liu2, Jinjia Liu3, Xiaodong Wen3,4, Christopher J Chang1,2,1,1.   

Abstract

Conversion of carbon monoxide (CO), a major one-carbon product of carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction, into value-added multicarbon species is a challenge to addressing global energy demands and climate change. Here we report a modular synthetic approach for aqueous electrochemical CO reduction to carbon-carbon coupled products via self-assembly of supramolecular cages at molecular-materials interfaces. Heterobimetallic cavities formed by face-to-face coordination of thiol-terminated metalloporphyrins to copper electrodes through varying organic struts convert CO to C2 products with high faradaic efficiency (FE = 83% total with 57% to ethanol) and current density (1.34 mA/cm2) at a potential of -0.40 V vs RHE. The cage-functionalized electrodes offer an order of magnitude improvement in both selectivity and activity for electrocatalytic carbon fixation compared to parent copper surfaces or copper functionalized with porphyrins in an edge-on orientation.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28979945      PMCID: PMC5620982          DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Cent Sci        ISSN: 2374-7943            Impact factor:   14.553


Introduction

Climate change and rising global energy demands motivate broad interest in carbon fixation to value-added products with formation of carboncarbon bonds.[1−6] In this context, carbon monoxide (CO) is a common one-carbon product of carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction[7−27] and major feedstock for producing multicarbon products as illustrated by the classic Fischer–Tropsch process.[28,29] Electrochemical CO reduction offers a complementary approach to C–C coupling reactivity with sustainable energy input,[30−33] where reducing hydrogen equivalents can be provided directly by aqueous electrolytes and thus bypass the traditionally energy-intensive steam reforming process for H2 production. Reports of electrochemical CO reduction are exceedingly rare relative to CO2 reduction and have focused largely on copper, which can reduce CO to C2 products including ethanol, acetate, and ethylene; however, conventional Cu electrodes show poor selectivity for CO over proton reduction and low energetic efficiency.[33] Elegant work by Kanan et al. has utilized grain boundaries to improve CO over H+ selectivity on nanocrystalline Cu materials,[30−32] but optimizing CO electroreduction catalysts at a molecular level to attain both high specificity and activity remains a significant challenge. In this regard, Nature provides inspiration for CO catalysis in the form of CO dehydrogenase enzymes (CODHs),[34−38] which drive efficient CO catalysis through self-assembly of heterobimetallic cavities (e.g., NiFe or MoCu) with pendant electron reservoirs. Against this backdrop, we sought to synthesize electrocatalysts for CO reduction that could combine these key bioinorganic features yet allow for molecular-level tunability. We now report a supramolecular approach to CO electrocatalysis in which heterobimetallic cages can be assembled directly at molecular–materials interfaces from systematically tunable building blocks. Specifically, we show that metalloporphyrins bearing thiol-terminated organic struts form synthetic cavities of predictable sizes and metalmetal distances upon cofacial interactions with Cu electrodes, enabling electrochemical CO reduction with high selectivity and activity for C2 products (Figure ). In addition to introducing interfacial supramolecular chemistry as a versatile design principle for an important catalytic carbon fixation process, this work provides a starting point for merging molecular and materials catalyst components through supramolecular self-assembly for a broader range of chemical transformations and applications.
Figure 1

Schematic illustration of traditional supramolecular assembly of cages between molecular components and supramolecular assembly of cages between molecular and materials components, as illustrated by formation of porphyrin cages on electrode surfaces.

Schematic illustration of traditional supramolecular assembly of cages between molecular components and supramolecular assembly of cages between molecular and materials components, as illustrated by formation of porphyrin cages on electrode surfaces.

Results and Discussion

Design, Synthesis, and Characterization of Porphyrin Caps for Formation of Supramolecular Cages at Molecule–Materials Interfaces

The design and synthesis of cage-forming porphyrin caps and their assembly onto metal surfaces are depicted in Figure and Scheme . We reasoned that α,α,α,α-atropisomers inspired by the classic picket-fence porphyrin model for hemoglobin oxygen transport[39] would provide a rigid platform to promote a face-to-face arrangement between the porphyrin molecule and metal surface, where thiol-terminated legs built off of the porphyrin scaffold at the ortho positions of the 5,10,15,20 aryl groups serve as multidentate connecting points to bind to the copper electrode material. Self-assembly at the molecular–materials interface would form a cage in which the porphyrin sits like a molecular table on top of the metal surface floor (Figure ). Accordingly, systematic variation of linkers and metals in both the molecular and materials components of this supramolecular assembly provides an opportunity to explore and optimize catalytic structures and properties. This hybrid approach, where interfacial supramolecular architectures are derived from both molecular and materials building blocks, is complementary to discrete molecular organic cages[40−44] as well as extended porous materials bearing catalytic porphyrin units.[23,45−50]
Scheme 1

A. Synthetic Procedures for the Preparation of Thiolate-Containing Porphyrins. B. Structures of Porphyrins Used in This Study

(i) Acetic acid, reflux, 1 h; (ii) SnCl2, 12 N HCl, 65°C; (iii) silica gel, benzene, 80 °C, 20 h; (iv) n = 1, bromoacetyl bromide; n = 2, 3-bromopropionyl bromide; n = 3, 4-chlorobutyryl chloride; n = 4, 5-chlorovaleroyl chloride; (v) KSAc, THF, 4 h; (vi) MCl2 (M= Fe, Zn, and Ni), 2,6-lutidine, THF.

A. Synthetic Procedures for the Preparation of Thiolate-Containing Porphyrins. B. Structures of Porphyrins Used in This Study

(i) Acetic acid, reflux, 1 h; (ii) SnCl2, 12 N HCl, 65°C; (iii) silica gel, benzene, 80 °C, 20 h; (iv) n = 1, bromoacetyl bromide; n = 2, 3-bromopropionyl bromide; n = 3, 4-chlorobutyryl chloride; n = 4, 5-chlorovaleroyl chloride; (v) KSAc, THF, 4 h; (vi) MCl2 (M= Fe, Zn, and Ni), 2,6-lutidine, THF. A general route to the syntheses of α,α,α,α-porphyrins and their metalated derivatives is shown in Scheme A. Scheme B depicts the molecular structures and nomenclatures of the synthesized (metallo)porphyrins along with two porphyrin analogues employed as controls.[51,52] In particular, we synthesized an isostructural α,α,α,α-porphyrin with legs that lack terminal thiol pendants for surface binding, as well as a para-substituted tetrathiol porphyrin congener designed to favor edge-on rather than face-to-face interactions with the metal surface. Full synthetic details are given in the Supporting Information. To generate hybrid supramolecular cages at the molecular–materials interface, metallic copper surfaces were treated with thiol porphyrins generated from in situ deprotection of thioacetate counterparts (Figure a).[53] Well-defined metallic Cu films prepared by e-beam evaporation were utilized as model substrates for surface characterization.[54] The successful attachment of the porphyrins to the Cu surface was first evidenced by high-resolution N 1s and S 2p X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The N 1s peak is consistent with a previously reported spectrum assigned to a porphyrin monolayer, confirming the existence of porphyrins on the surface (Figure b).[55,56] The S 2p region exhibits two distinct peaks at around ∼161–164 eV and ∼167–169 eV, corresponding to the thiolate and sulfonate species, respectively (Figure c).[54] The presence of thiolate species on the surface corroborates possible porphyrin attachment via formation of Cu–S bonds, whereas the sulfonate peaks might be derived from partial thiolate oxidation after air exposure due to the high oxygen permeability of the void spaces in the porphyrin cages. The functionalized Cu surface also shows a slightly wider Cu 2p peak but with lower signal at ∼933 eV compared to the unfunctionalized Cu control surface (Figure S1), which can be reasoned by the surface-attached porphyrin partially oxidizing the Cu surface via Cu–S bond formation. Complementary external reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) measurements provide addition support for porphyrin attachment (Figure S2).
Figure 2

(a) Schematic illustration of the functionalization of Cu surfaces with porphyrin cages. (i) NH3 in methanol/chloroform, 25 °C, 4 h; (ii) sodium borohydride, DMF, 25 °C, 12 h. (b) High resolution N 1s and (c) S 2p XPS spectra of 100 nm Cu on Si wafer functionalizated with porphyrin cages. (d) Cyclic voltammetry curves of underpotential deposition of Pb on Cu (black), Cu tethered with alkene-terminated porphyrins (dashed blue), and Cu tethered with thiol-terminated porphyrins (red). The scan rate is 10 mV/s.

(a) Schematic illustration of the functionalization of Cu surfaces with porphyrin cages. (i) NH3 in methanol/chloroform, 25 °C, 4 h; (ii) sodium borohydride, DMF, 25 °C, 12 h. (b) High resolution N 1s and (c) S 2p XPS spectra of 100 nm Cu on Si wafer functionalizated with porphyrin cages. (d) Cyclic voltammetry curves of underpotential deposition of Pb on Cu (black), Cu tethered with alkene-terminated porphyrins (dashed blue), and Cu tethered with thiol-terminated porphyrins (red). The scan rate is 10 mV/s. Two potential limiting configurations for porphyrin coordination to the Cu surface may be envisioned, which are anticipated to lead to disparate catalytic performances. In one possible configuration, the porphyrin coordinates with the Cu surface via Cu–S interactions to form a cage architecture where the porphyrin face is elevated above the surface. Another possibility is for the porphyrin face to lie directly on the Cu surface through van der Waals interactions, blocking potential access of reactants to the surface. To investigate these possible binding modes, we employed electrochemical underpotential deposition (UPD) studies, in which the measured monolayer thickness of a metal-deposited guest is highly indicative of the number of surface substrate sites that are electrochemically accessible.[57] Porphyrins that orient face-down and promote direct interactions with the Cu surface would block the electrode and result in fewer Cu sites able to be accessed by UPD. In contrast, porphyrins that orient with legs down and favor coordination through Cu–S bonds to create porous cages would leave more Cu sites accessible to the electrolyte solution, resulting in UPD peak areas that are comparable to control Cu surfaces. To this end, we probed accessible Cu sites by the UPD of lead (Pb) on Cu surfaces in the presence of chloride anions. The standard Cu surfaces (100 nm Cu on Si) show a pair of underpotential deposition and dissolution peaks in the range of −0.05 V to −0.25 V vs standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) (Figure d).[58] Treating the Cu surfaces with H2PAA porphyrins bearing terminal alkene groups shows voltammograms that exhibit smaller peak areas with retained peak shapes and potentials, likely due to the inability of the alkenes to form stable interactions with the Cu surface and possible porphyrinCu stacking behavior, both of which would impede Pb deposition. In contrast, the Cu surfaces functionalized with H2PC2SH porphyrins bearing terminal thiol groups exhibit almost identical peak areas to control Cu (Figure d), showing that porphyrins interacting in this mode do not restrict access to the Cu electrode. Interestingly, the thiol-porphyrin-functionalized Cu surfaces also exhibit a distinct peak shift to more positive potentials, indicating more facile Pb deposition with this molecular attachment (Figure d). Taken together, the data suggest that the local electronic structure of the Cu surface has been altered after porphyrin binding, likely due to the partial oxidation of the surface as a result of the formation of Cu–S bonds. The UPD results also imply a high coverage of the porphyrin molecules on the Cu surface since no UPD current is observed at the potential characteristic for unfunctionalized Cu surfaces. The observations from UPD and XPS studies both support the creation of porphyrin cages on a sterically accessible metallic Cu surface via designed Cu–S interactions.

Electrocatalytic CO Reduction with Hybrid Supramolecular Porphyrin Cages Formed on Copper

With these initial hybrid systems in hand, we evaluated their activity for electrocatalytic CO reduction compared to unfunctionalized Cu foils (Figure ). To compare catalytic activity and selectivity, with particular interest in C–C coupled products, controlled potential electrolysis (CPE) measurements at various potentials were carried out in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). The collected gas-phase products were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC), and the liquid-phase products were quantified by 1H NMR (Figure S3). Three major C2 products derived from C–C bond formation—acetate, ethanol, and ethylene—were detected for all electrodes in the potential range of −0.45 V to −0.65 V vs reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE). The faradaic efficiencies (FEs) and specific current densities for each product are shown for direct comparison (Figure ). As expected, Cu foil alone exhibits low basal activity, with <15% total FE toward CO reduction at relatively low overpotentials (<−0.6 V vs RHE) (Figures a–3d and Figure S4) and an appreciable amount of ethylene as the major product of CO reduction beyond −0.6 V vs RHE, consistent with previous reports (Figures e and 3f).[30,33]
Figure 3

Faradaic efficiencies of CO reduction into (a) acetate, (c) ethanol, and (e) ethylene under different potentials on Cu foil and Cu-H2PC2SH in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). Specific current densities of CO reduction into (b) acetate, (d) ethanol, and (f) ethylene under different potentials on Cu foil and Cu-H2PC2SH in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq).

Faradaic efficiencies of CO reduction into (a) acetate, (c) ethanol, and (e) ethylene under different potentials on Cu foil and Cu-H2PC2SH in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). Specific current densities of CO reduction into (b) acetate, (d) ethanol, and (f) ethylene under different potentials on Cu foil and Cu-H2PC2SH in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). We next evaluated the effects of porphyrin functionalization as well as cage size on CO reduction to C–C coupled products by systematically varying the linker lengths in the spacer region (H2PCSH, n = 1–4). Interestingly, all Cu foils with surface-tethered porphyrins exhibit significantly higher propensities for oxygenate formation (Figure ). Specifically, an optimal CO reduction selectivity toward oxygenate production was obtained with the two-carbon linker at a potential of −0.55 V vs RHE (Figure b). Further expanding the cage size (n = 3, 4) results in a notable decrease in the FEs toward C2 oxygenates. We then compared the activity and selectivity of the optimized Cu-H2PC2SH electrode with bare Cu foil under different potentials, and the results show significantly higher FEs and more positive onset potentials for C2 oxygenate formation. More negative applied potentials greatly influence the observed FEs, resulting in reduced amounts of acetate and ethanol production while boosting undesired competitive hydrogen evolution. In contrast, almost identical FEs and current densities were observed on Cu foil and Cu-H2PC2SH electrodes for the production of ethylene (Figures e and 3f), suggesting that the surface-tethered porphyrin cages affect the reduction pathways toward C2 oxygenate products but not the reduction pathway to this C2 hydrocarbon.
Figure 4

(a) Schematic illustration of free-base porphyrins possessing different linker lengths. (b) Faradaic efficiencies for CO reduction on Cu foils functionalized with free-base porphyrins possessing different linker lengths (Cu-H2PCSH). The electrolyses were performed at a constant potential of −0.55 V vs RHE in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq).

(a) Schematic illustration of free-base porphyrins possessing different linker lengths. (b) Faradaic efficiencies for CO reduction on Cu foils functionalized with free-base porphyrins possessing different linker lengths (Cu-H2PCSH). The electrolyses were performed at a constant potential of −0.55 V vs RHE in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). To further probe the nature of the observed enhancements in CO selectivity enabled by supramolecular formation of porphyrin cages on Cu surfaces, we designed a series of control molecules to investigate the roles of these surface-tethered porphyrin caps. Cu surfaces functionalized with simple monothiol additives such as 1-dodecanethiol (C12SH), which support conventional self-assembled monolayers (SAMs),[54] or with 3-mercapto-N-phenylpropanamide (3-MPPA), which mimics a single linker arm in H2PC2SH porphyrins with a pendant amide, were first utilized as thiolate analogues for comparison. The Cu-C12SH electrode exhibits dramatically lowered current densities compared to Cu-H2PC2SH, with hydrogen (H2) as the only major product generated at a potential of −0.55 V vs RHE (Figure a and Figure S5). We speculate that this low activity for CO reduction is likely the result of the large energy barrier for diffusing polar CO molecules into the densely packed nonpolar SAMs. Along the same lines, Cu-3-MPPA exhibits lower overall current densities compared to Cu-tethered thiolporphyrins and a characteristic CPE curve with an initial drop followed by a gradual recovery in current density similar to Cu-H2PC2SH electrode (Figure a and Figure S5). However, the selectivity for this MPPA system toward CO reduction is low, reaching only a ∼10% total FE for carbon products (Figure a). Moreover, the para-functionalized porphyrin analogue (Cu-H2-p-PC2SH) also exhibits significantly lower selectivity toward CO reduction compared to the table-like ortho analogue Cu-H2-o-PC2SH (Figure a). We speculate that the para porphyrins having a flat architecture would either pack by standing edge-on the Cu surfaces via one or two thiolate linkages or lie flat on the surface with direct face-to-face stacking; in either case, these porphyrins are incapable of forming catalytic cages and serve to block accessible Cu sites, thereby lowering electrocatalytic activity and CO selectivity. Finally, the Cu-H2PAA system bearing terminal alkenes that do not strongly bind copper, mentioned above for UPD studies, exhibits a similar product distribution to bare Cu surfaces (Figure a) and reduced surface access as measured by UPD (Figure d).
Figure 5

(a) Specific faradaic efficiencies of CO reduction on Cu-H2PC2SH in comparison with Cu foil and other control groups. 1: Cu + H2PC2SH. 2: Cu + C12SH. 3: Cu + 3-MMPA. 4: Cu + H2PAA. 5: Cu + H2-p-PC2SH. The electrolysis was performed at a constant potential of −0.55 V vs RHE in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). (b) DFT calculation of a speculative ketene intermediate within the porphyrin cage formed on Cu(100) surfaces, which identifies a potential rationalization for differences in CO reduction selectivity for different cage sizes but does not rule out other plausible mechanistic possibilities.

(a) Specific faradaic efficiencies of CO reduction on Cu-H2PC2SH in comparison with Cu foil and other control groups. 1: Cu + H2PC2SH. 2: Cu + C12SH. 3: Cu + 3-MMPA. 4: Cu + H2PAA. 5: Cu + H2-p-PC2SH. The electrolysis was performed at a constant potential of −0.55 V vs RHE in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). (b) DFT calculation of a speculative ketene intermediate within the porphyrin cage formed on Cu(100) surfaces, which identifies a potential rationalization for differences in CO reduction selectivity for different cage sizes but does not rule out other plausible mechanistic possibilities. The foregoing results establish that the supramolecular cavity created by the rigid table-like porphyrin scaffold plays a central role in enhancing the selectivity for electrochemical CO reduction to value-added C2 products and over competing water reduction, whereas traditional architectures for molecular functionalization of surfaces through metalthiol interactions are not beneficial due to the lack of accessible sites on the Cu electrodes. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations on a Cu(100) surface point to a tentative mechanistic proposal involving a ketene intermediate,[59,60] which we speculate may be tuned through hydrogen-bond interactions with the porphyrin cap (Figure b and Table S1). Such interactions could rationalize the observed differences in selectivity for CO reduction observed for varying cage sizes but do not rule out other plausible mechanistic possibilities, and further studies must be pursued to address this open question. The stability of the porphyrin cages on the Cu surfaces was further investigated by UPD and XPS studies (Figure S6). Cu-H2PC2SH electrode shows a consistent positive shift of the UPD peak by ∼14 mV compared to the unfunctionalized control Cu electrode. This positive shift is retained after electrolysis, suggesting the persistence of the porphyrin cages on Cu surfaces under CO electroreduction conditions (Figure S6a,b). XPS measurements reveal slight decreases of N 1s and S 2p XPS signals and an increase of Cu 2p XPS signal after electrolysis, indicating some loss of weakly bound porphyrin cages during electrocatalysis (Figure S6c–e), but the retained N 1s and S 2p peaks still suggest the relatively high stability of the porphyrin cages for CO reduction.

Heterobimetallic Supramolecular Porphyrin Cages for Improved CO Reduction Reactivity

In addition to enforcing a rigid cage to maintain surface accessibility as well as orient hydrogen-bond pendants to influence reaction selectivity, the porphyrin caps also enable facile introduction and tuning of a second metal site in proximity to the metal electrode center. We anticipated that a second type of metal center has the potential not only to participate as a catalytically active site but also to contribute as a synergistic cofactor to increase local CO concentrations and/or tune the electronic structure of the metal surface for improved CO reduction activity. Indeed, metalloporphyrins have been explored widely in homogeneous catalysis.[14,19,24,61−64] To this end, we screened a series of metals inserted into the two-carbon-linker porphyrin caps (e.g., Fe, Ni, Zn) and observed that the introduction of Fe centers in the porphyrins increases the preference for ethanol production while decreasing the relative ratio of acetate at all potentials applied (Figure a,b and Figure S7). An optimal ethanol FE of ∼52% is obtained on a Cu-FePC2SH electrode at a potential of −0.50 V vs RHE (Figure b) with good long-term stability over continuous CO reduction electrocatalysis (Figure S8), only losing ca. 10% FE for C2 products over a 24 h period. As expected, functionalization with the redox-inert Zn porphyrin shows comparable product selectivity to that of free-base porphyrins. In contrast, insertion of Ni into porphyrin cap shifts product distributions toward hydrogen formation and a higher FE for ethylene, which may likely be due to the high intrinsic hydrogenation capability of the Ni porphyrins (Figure a).[65,66]
Figure 6

(a) Faradaic efficiencies for CO reduction on Cu foils functionalized with metalloporphyrins containing different metal centers (Cu-MPC2SH). The electrolysis was performed at a constant potential of −0.55 V vs RHE in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). (b) Faradaic efficiencies for CO reduction into ethanol under different potentials with Cu-H2PC2SH and Cu-FePC2SH in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). (c) Faradaic efficiencies of acetaldehyde reduction into ethanol on Cu foil, Cu-H2PC2SH, and Cu-FePC2SH in Ar-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq) with 10 mM acetaldehyde at a constant potential of −0.40 V vs RHE. (d) Tafel plots of specific current densities of CO reduction into ethanol on Cu, Cu-H2PC2SH, and Cu-FePC2SH in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). (e) Specific faradaic efficiencies and (f) specific current densities of CO reduction on electrodeposited Cu functionalized with iron porphyrins (FePC2SH). The ethylene current density corresponds to the right y-axis.

(a) Faradaic efficiencies for CO reduction on Cu foils functionalized with metalloporphyrins containing different metal centers (Cu-MPC2SH). The electrolysis was performed at a constant potential of −0.55 V vs RHE in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). (b) Faradaic efficiencies for CO reduction into ethanol under different potentials with Cu-H2PC2SH and Cu-FePC2SH in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). (c) Faradaic efficiencies of acetaldehyde reduction into ethanol on Cu foil, Cu-H2PC2SH, and Cu-FePC2SH in Ar-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq) with 10 mM acetaldehyde at a constant potential of −0.40 V vs RHE. (d) Tafel plots of specific current densities of CO reduction into ethanol on Cu, Cu-H2PC2SH, and Cu-FePC2SH in CO-saturated 0.1 M KOH (aq). (e) Specific faradaic efficiencies and (f) specific current densities of CO reduction on electrodeposited Cu functionalized with iron porphyrins (FePC2SH). The ethylene current density corresponds to the right y-axis. With the observation of varying product distributions with different metal substitutions into the porphyrin cap, we next sought to probe aspects of how the Fe derivative promotes higher levels of ethanol production. In this context, previous studies have identified acetaldehyde as a key intermediate for electrochemical CO reduction into ethanol in alkaline media.[67] We thus utilized acetaldehyde as a model substrate for studying the role of Fe in this catalytic process. To this end, the electrocatalytic reductions of acetaldehyde on bare Cu foil, Cu-H2PC2SH, and Cu-FePC2SH electrodes were examined in 0.1 M KOH (aq) with the addition of 10 mM acetaldehyde under Ar atmosphere. The Cu-FePC2SH electrode shows slightly higher activity toward acetaldehyde reduction, with a positive shift in the polarization curves (Figure S9) and much higher FEs toward ethanol production than bare Cu surfaces or Cu functionalized with free-base porphyrin caps (Figure c). In fact, Fe porphyrins alone deposited on glassy carbon electrodes show moderate activity toward acetaldehyde reduction with a reasonable current density within the potential range for CO reduction (Figure S9), which is consistent with previous findings that Fe porphyrins can be effectively used as catalysts for the hydrogenation of various aldehydes and ketones.[68] As such, we propose that Fe porphyrins might participate in reduction of acetaldehyde intermediates, which in turn favors increased ethanol production in electrochemical CO reduction. Indeed, the Tafel plot of the specific ethanol current densities on Cu-FePC2SH electrodes shows a much earlier onset potential but exhibits a larger Tafel slope of 174 mV/dec (Figure d). This deviation from the Tafel slopes of 126 and 127 mV/dec observed on Cu foil and on Cu-H2PC2SH electrodes, respectively, supports the participation of Fe porphyrins in the rate-determining step of the ethanol production pathway, with observation of a larger Tafel slope for the FeCu bimetallic system compared to Cu-only congeners resulting from inefficiencies in charge transfer between the Fe porphyrin and Cu surface. Evidence for this notion is provided by the larger charge transfer resistance under CO atmosphere compared to Ar (Figure S10), and future efforts will aim to increase charge transfer efficiency. Finally, we sought to optimize the CO reduction activity of these hybrid heterobimetallic systems, using the Cu-FePC2SH porphyrin catalyst showing the best product selectivity toward the liquid fuel ethanol as a starting point. Previous work highlights the significance of exposed Cu facets for electrochemical CO2 or CO reductions,[26,60,69−74] where Cu(100) or other high-energy facets are more active than the thermodynamically more stable Cu(111) surfaces and can enhance formation of CO dimerized products.[26,60,71,73,75,76] We employed electrodeposition of Cu on glassy carbon in chloride-containing aqueous CuSO4 electrolyte as a general and facile way of controlling the exposed facets of the Cu substrates.[77,78] The supramolecular catalyst systems formed by combination of the FePC2SH porphyrin caps with electrodeposited Cu exhibit markedly higher specific current densities at low overpotentials (Figure f). The CO reduction product distribution is relatively similar to that of Fe porphyrin cages on Cu foils, but with slightly lower FEs for hydrogen production (Figure e). The higher current densities allow for quantitative analyses of the products at even lower overpotentials where competitive hydrogen evolution is insignificant. Specifically, at −0.4 V vs RHE, the catalyst achieves a total FE of 83% toward CO reduction into C2 products, with 57% FE for ethanol and 24% FE for acetate at a current density of 1.34 mA/cm2 (Figure e).

Conclusions

In summary, we have presented a supramolecular strategy for electrocatalytic carbon fixation to multicarbon products through the self-assembly of synthetic cages at molecular–materials interfaces. Porphyrin capping units with directional legs terminated by thiol ligands form face-to-face cavities upon binding copper electrodes that leave surface sites electrochemically accessible. Varying linker lengths as well as metal substitutions in the porphyrin core provide versatile molecular handles for tuning selectivity and activity for electrochemical CO reduction to carboncarbon coupled products. The heterobimetallic molecular materials formed by assembly of the C2-linked Fe porphyrin derivative on Cu achieve up to 83% FE for CO reduction into C2 products, with up to 57% ethanol and 24% acetate generated at −0.4 V vs RHE and a current density of 1.34 mA/cm2. These values represent an order of magnitude improvement over unfunctionalized copper electrodes. Further experiments suggest that the Fe center can aid in cooperative reduction of potential acetaldehyde intermediates. Moreover, control analogues that lack thiol binding groups as well as positional isomers favoring edge-on binding or direct van der Waals stacking exhibit reduced surface access and negligible CO over water reduction selectivity, pointing to a critical role for the three-dimensional pocket in catalysis. In addition to establishing a unique electrochemical platform for reducing CO to value-added C2 oxygenates, this work provides a starting point for the design of supramolecular architectures at molecular–materials interfaces for a broader range of chemical transformations and applications of interest.
  55 in total

1.  Light-harvesting metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): efficient strut-to-strut energy transfer in bodipy and porphyrin-based MOFs.

Authors:  Chang Yeon Lee; Omar K Farha; Bong Jin Hong; Amy A Sarjeant; SonBinh T Nguyen; Joseph T Hupp
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Through-Space Charge Interaction Substituent Effects in Molecular Catalysis Leading to the Design of the Most Efficient Catalyst of CO2-to-CO Electrochemical Conversion.

Authors:  Iban Azcarate; Cyrille Costentin; Marc Robert; Jean-Michel Savéant
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Hydrogen evolution from neutral water under aerobic conditions catalyzed by cobalt microperoxidase-11.

Authors:  Jesse G Kleingardner; Banu Kandemir; Kara L Bren
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Azurin as a protein scaffold for a low-coordinate nonheme iron site with a small-molecule binding pocket.

Authors:  Matthew P McLaughlin; Marius Retegan; Eckhard Bill; Thomas M Payne; Hannah S Shafaat; Salvador Peña; Jawahar Sudhamsu; Amy A Ensign; Brian R Crane; Frank Neese; Patrick L Holland
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Ionic liquid-mediated selective conversion of CO₂ to CO at low overpotentials.

Authors:  Brian A Rosen; Amin Salehi-Khojin; Michael R Thorson; Wei Zhu; Devin T Whipple; Paul J A Kenis; Richard I Masel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Probing the Active Surface Sites for CO Reduction on Oxide-Derived Copper Electrocatalysts.

Authors:  Arnau Verdaguer-Casadevall; Christina W Li; Tobias P Johansson; Soren B Scott; Joseph T McKeown; Mukul Kumar; Ifan E L Stephens; Matthew W Kanan; Ib Chorkendorff
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  A catalytically active, permanently microporous MOF with metalloporphyrin struts.

Authors:  Abraham M Shultz; Omar K Farha; Joseph T Hupp; SonBinh T Nguyen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  A local proton source enhances CO2 electroreduction to CO by a molecular Fe catalyst.

Authors:  Cyrille Costentin; Samuel Drouet; Marc Robert; Jean-Michel Savéant
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Porphyrin Boxes: Rationally Designed Porous Organic Cages.

Authors:  Soonsang Hong; Md Rumum Rohman; Jiangtao Jia; Youngkook Kim; Dohyun Moon; Yonghwi Kim; Young Ho Ko; Eunsung Lee; Kimoon Kim
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 10.  Porous Molecular Solids and Liquids.

Authors:  Andrew I Cooper
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 14.553

View more
  3 in total

1.  Electro- and Solar-Driven Fuel Synthesis with First Row Transition Metal Complexes.

Authors:  Kristian E Dalle; Julien Warnan; Jane J Leung; Bertrand Reuillard; Isabell S Karmel; Erwin Reisner
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 2.  Mechanisms of catalytic reduction of CO2 with heme and nonheme metal complexes.

Authors:  Shunichi Fukuzumi; Yong-Min Lee; Hyun S Ahn; Wonwoo Nam
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 9.825

3.  End-On Bound Iridium Dinuclear Heterogeneous Catalysts on WO3 for Solar Water Oxidation.

Authors:  Yanyan Zhao; Xingxu Yan; Ke R Yang; Sufeng Cao; Qi Dong; James E Thorne; Kelly L Materna; Shasha Zhu; Xiaoqing Pan; Maria Flytzani-Stephanopoulos; Gary W Brudvig; Victor S Batista; Dunwei Wang
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 14.553

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.