Literature DB >> 28149779

Clinical evaluation of surgery-induced astigmatism in cataract surgery using 2.2 mm or 1.8 mm clear corneal micro-incisions.

Jun Yang1, Xiu Wang1, Hong Zhang2, Yi Pang3, Rui-Hua Wei1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate corneal astigmatism after phacoemulsification using 2.2 mm or 1.8 mm clear corneal micro-incisions and its effects on visual function.
METHODS: Sixty cases (60 eyes) with cataract were randomly divided into groups A (n=30) and B (n=30) respectively underwent 2.2 mm and 1.8 mm clear corneal tunnel incision phacoemulsification combined with folding intraocular lens implantation from the time direction of 11:00. On day 1 and at 1, 4, and 6wk after operation, patients' vision was measured and both the corneal curvature and corneal thickness (CT) were recorded using Pentacam.
RESULTS: The measured surgery-induced astigmatism (SIA) in both groups A and B peaked on day 1 after operation, and then gradually decreased and eventually stabilized in week 4. No statistically significant difference was found in corneal astigmatism between two groups (P>0.05). The measured corneal astigmatism at 4wk and 6wk postoperatively were 0.28±0.09 D and 0.27±0.10 D for groups A and 0.27±0.09 D and 0.25±0.10 D for groups B without statistically significant difference (P>0.05). In addition, no significant differences in visual acuity and CT were found between groups A and B before or after operation.
CONCLUSION: Both 2.2 mm and 1.8 mm micro-incision cataract surgeries result in relatively small SIA with no difference in visual function and corneal astigmatism between two surgery approaches. Thus, the two types of surgical systems are safe and efficient for cataract treatment, by which satisfactory uncorrected visual acuity can be regained early postoperatively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corneal astigmatism; phacoemulsification; surgery-induced astigmatism

Year:  2017        PMID: 28149779      PMCID: PMC5225351          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2017.01.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  16 in total

Review 1.  Update on bimanual microincisional cataract surgery.

Authors:  Mitchell P Weikert
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.761

2.  Surgically induced astigmatism assessment: comparison between three corneal measuring devices.

Authors:  Shay Ofir; Adi Abulafia; Guy Kleinmann; Olga Reitblat; Ehud I Assia
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  [Induced astigmatism after corneal suture removal after cataract surgery].

Authors:  P Loriaut; G Kaswin; A Rousseau; L Meziani; N M'nafek; N Pogorzalek; M Labetoulle
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 0.818

4.  The effect of micro-incision and small-incision coaxial phaco-emulsification on corneal astigmatism.

Authors:  Jun Wang; En-Kui Zhang; Wen-Ying Fan; Jian-Xin Ma; Peng-Fei Zhao
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  Comparison of the induced astigmatism after temporal clear corneal tunnel incisions of different sizes.

Authors:  T Kohnen; B Dick; K W Jacobi
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Surgically induced astigmatism after superotemporal and superonasal clear corneal incisions in phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Sitki Samet Ermiş; Umit Ubeyt Inan; Faruk Oztürk
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Intraoperative performance and postoperative outcomes of microcoaxial phacoemulsification. Observational study.

Authors:  Viraj Vasavada; Vaishali Vasavada; Shetal M Raj; Abhay R Vasavada
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Induced astigmatism with 2.2- and 3.0-mm coaxial phacoemulsification incisions.

Authors:  Samuel Masket; Li Wang; Shaleen Belani
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Comparison of surgically-induced astigmatism after combined phacoemulsification and 23-gauge vitrectomy: 2.2-mm vs. 2.75-mm cataract surgery.

Authors:  Yong-Kyu Kim; Yong Woo Kim; Se Joon Woo; Kyu Hyung Park
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-14

10.  Preliminary study of the association between corneal histocytological changes and surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Xing Du; Guiqiu Zhao; Qing Wang; Xian Yang; Ang Gao; Jing Lin; Qian Wang; Qiang Xu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.209

View more
  6 in total

1.  A comparison of surgical efficacy between a 1.8-mm microincision and 3.2-mm and 5.5-mm incisions for phacoemulsification.

Authors:  E Song; Xin Li; Ming-Chao Bi; Hua Ren; Dan Wang; Zhi-Hua Cui; Wei Yang; Hui Shi; Ya-Bin Sun
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Comparison of incision size and intraocular lens performance after implantation with three preloaded systems and one manual delivery system.

Authors:  Javier Mendicute; Thierry Amzallag; Lixin Wang; Aldo A Martinez
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-21

3.  Effect of Excisional Goniotomy with the Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) on Surgically Induced Astigmatism.

Authors:  Matthew Hirabayashi; Gurpal Virdi; Joshua King; Dayeong Lee; Van Nguyen; Jella An
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-08

Review 4.  Refractive Outcomes after Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Ramin Khoramnia; Gerd Auffarth; Grzegorz Łabuz; George Pettit; Rajaraman Suryakumar
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19

5.  Correlations of Immediate Corneal Tomography Changes with Preoperative and the Elapsed Phaco Parameters.

Authors:  Jorge Selem Haddad; Clainijane Borges; Nathalie Dalloul Daher; Alexandre Mine; Marcella Salomão; Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-04

6.  Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of AtLisa tri 839 MP and Symfony intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Wojciech Lubiński; Karolina Podborączyńska-Jodko; Marta Kirkiewicz; Maciej Mularczyk; Michał Post
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.