OBJECTIVES: To assess the role of value-based payment (VBP) in improving fidelity and patient outcomes in community implementation of an evidence-based mental health intervention, the Collaborative Care Model (CCM). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study based on a natural experiment. METHODS: We used the clinical tracking data of 1806 adult patients enrolled in a large implementation of the CCM in community health clinics in Washington state. VBP was initiated in year 2 of the program, creating a natural experiment. We compared implementation fidelity (measured by 3 process-of-care elements of the CCM) between patient-months exposed to VBP and patient-months not exposed to VBP. A series of regressions were estimated to check robustness of findings. We estimated a Cox proportional hazard model to assess the effect of VBP on time to achieving clinically significant improvement in depression (measured based on changes in depression symptom scores over time). RESULTS: Estimated marginal effects of VBP on fidelity ranged from 9% to 30% of the level of fidelity had there been no exposure to VBP (P <.05 for every fidelity measure). Improvement in fidelity in response to VBP was greater among providers with a larger patient panel and among providers with a lower level of fidelity at baseline. Exposure to VBP was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.03) for achieving clinically significant improvement in depression. CONCLUSIONS: VBP improved fidelity to key elements of the CCM, both directly incentivized and not explicitly incentivized by the VBP, and improved patient depression outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the role of value-based payment (VBP) in improving fidelity and patient outcomes in community implementation of an evidence-based mental health intervention, the Collaborative Care Model (CCM). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study based on a natural experiment. METHODS: We used the clinical tracking data of 1806 adult patients enrolled in a large implementation of the CCM in community health clinics in Washington state. VBP was initiated in year 2 of the program, creating a natural experiment. We compared implementation fidelity (measured by 3 process-of-care elements of the CCM) between patient-months exposed to VBP and patient-months not exposed to VBP. A series of regressions were estimated to check robustness of findings. We estimated a Cox proportional hazard model to assess the effect of VBP on time to achieving clinically significant improvement in depression (measured based on changes in depression symptom scores over time). RESULTS: Estimated marginal effects of VBP on fidelity ranged from 9% to 30% of the level of fidelity had there been no exposure to VBP (P <.05 for every fidelity measure). Improvement in fidelity in response to VBP was greater among providers with a larger patient panel and among providers with a lower level of fidelity at baseline. Exposure to VBP was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.03) for achieving clinically significant improvement in depression. CONCLUSIONS: VBP improved fidelity to key elements of the CCM, both directly incentivized and not explicitly incentivized by the VBP, and improved patientdepression outcomes.
Authors: Sheila Leatherman; Donald Berwick; Debra Iles; Lawrence S Lewin; Frank Davidoff; Thomas Nolan; Maureen Bisognano Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Marjorie L Pearson; Shinyi Wu; Judith Schaefer; Amy E Bonomi; Stephen M Shortell; Peter J Mendel; Jill A Marsteller; Thomas A Louis; Mayde Rosen; Emmett B Keeler Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Linda S Williams; Kurt Kroenke; Tamilyn Bakas; Laurie D Plue; Edward Brizendine; Wanzhu Tu; Hugh Hendrie Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-02-15 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Amy M Kilbourne; Kathryn Beck; Brigitta Spaeth-Rublee; Parashar Ramanuj; Robert W O'Brien; Naomi Tomoyasu; Harold Alan Pincus Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Bradley E Belsher; Daniel P Evatt; Xian Liu; Michael C Freed; Charles C Engel; Erin H Beech; Lisa H Jaycox Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lucinda B Leung; Christopher T Benitez; Charmaine Dorsey; Anish P Mahajan; Gerhard S Hellemann; Fiona Whelan; Nina J Park; Joel T Braslow Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 3.178
Authors: Mark S Bauer; Christopher J Miller; Bo Kim; Robert Lew; Kelly Stolzmann; Jennifer Sullivan; Rachel Riendeau; Jeffery Pitcock; Alicia Williamson; Samantha Connolly; A Rani Elwy; Kendra Weaver Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-03-01
Authors: Dorine J van Staalduinen; Petra van den Bekerom; Sandra Groeneveld; Martha Kidanemariam; Anne M Stiggelbout; M Elske van den Akker-van Marle Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 2.655