Parashar Ramanuj1, Erin Ferenchik2, Mary Docherty3, Brigitta Spaeth-Rublee4, Harold Alan Pincus4. 1. Imperial College Health Partners, 30 Euston Square, London, NW1 2FB, UK. p.ramanuj@doctors.org.uk. 2. Center for Family and Community Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA. 3. Department of Psychological Medicine, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK. 4. New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mental and physical disorders commonly co-occur leading to higher morbidity and mortality in people with mental and substance use disorders (collectively called behavioral health disorders). Models to integrate primary and behavioral health care for this population have not yet been implemented widely across health systems, leading to efforts to adapt models for specific subpopulations and mechanisms to facilitate more widespread adoption. RECENT FINDINGS: Using examples from the UK and USA, we describe recent advances to integrate behavioral and primary care for new target populations including people with serious mental illness, people at the extremes of life, and for people with substance use disorders. We summarize mechanisms to incentivize integration efforts and to stimulate new integration between health and social services in primary care. We then present an outline of recent enablers for integration, concentrating on changes to funding mechanisms, developments in quality outcome measurements to promote collaborative working, and pragmatic guidance aimed at primary care providers wishing to enhance provision of behavioral care. Integrating care between primary care and behavioral health services is a complex process. Established models of integrated care are now being tailored to target specific patient populations and policy initiatives developed to encourage adoption in particular settings. Wholly novel approaches to integrate care are significantly less common. Future efforts to integrate care should allow for flexibility and innovation around implementation, payment models that support delivery of high value care, and the development of outcome measures that incentivize collaborative working practices.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mental and physical disorders commonly co-occur leading to higher morbidity and mortality in people with mental and substance use disorders (collectively called behavioral health disorders). Models to integrate primary and behavioral health care for this population have not yet been implemented widely across health systems, leading to efforts to adapt models for specific subpopulations and mechanisms to facilitate more widespread adoption. RECENT FINDINGS: Using examples from the UK and USA, we describe recent advances to integrate behavioral and primary care for new target populations including people with serious mental illness, people at the extremes of life, and for people with substance use disorders. We summarize mechanisms to incentivize integration efforts and to stimulate new integration between health and social services in primary care. We then present an outline of recent enablers for integration, concentrating on changes to funding mechanisms, developments in quality outcome measurements to promote collaborative working, and pragmatic guidance aimed at primary care providers wishing to enhance provision of behavioral care. Integrating care between primary care and behavioral health services is a complex process. Established models of integrated care are now being tailored to target specific patient populations and policy initiatives developed to encourage adoption in particular settings. Wholly novel approaches to integrate care are significantly less common. Future efforts to integrate care should allow for flexibility and innovation around implementation, payment models that support delivery of high value care, and the development of outcome measures that incentivize collaborative working practices.
Entities:
Keywords:
Co-occurring conditions; Collaborative care; Integrated care; Mental health services; Primary care
Authors: Laura P Richardson; Evette Ludman; Elizabeth McCauley; Jeff Lindenbaum; Cindy Larison; Chuan Zhou; Greg Clarke; David Brent; Wayne Katon Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Katherine E Watkins; Allison J Ober; Karen Lamp; Mimi Lind; Claude Setodji; Karen Chan Osilla; Sarah B Hunter; Colleen M McCullough; Kirsten Becker; Praise O Iyiewuare; Allison Diamant; Keith Heinzerling; Harold Alan Pincus Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Ann John; Joanna McGregor; Ian Jones; Sze Chim Lee; James T R Walters; Michael J Owen; Michael O'Donovan; Marcos DelPozo-Banos; Damon Berridge; Keith Lloyd Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Elizabeth M Camacho; Linda M Davies; Mark Hann; Nicola Small; Peter Bower; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Clare Baguely; Linda Gask; Chris M Dickens; Karina Lovell; Waquas Waheed; Chris J Gibbons; Peter Coventry Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Sara Spinella; Nicole McCune; Rebecca McCarthy; Maria El-Tahch; Jennifer George; Mary Dorritie; Alyssa Ford; Kira Posteraro; Deborah DiNardo Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-08-30 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Denalee M O'Malley; Cilgy M Abraham; Heather S Lee; Ellen B Rubinstein; Jenna Howard; Shawna V Hudson; Autumn M Kieber-Emmons; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 2.290
Authors: Jennifer Severe; Paul N Pfeiffer; Katherine Palm-Cruz; Theresa Hoeft; Rebecca Sripada; Matthew Hawrilenko; Shiyu Chen; John Fortney Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-02-02 Impact factor: 6.473