Bradley E Belsher1,2, Daniel P Evatt3,4, Xian Liu3,4, Michael C Freed4,5, Charles C Engel4,6, Erin H Beech3, Lisa H Jaycox6. 1. Psychological Health Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency, Silver Spring, MD, USA. bradley.e.belsher.civ@mail.mil. 2. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. bradley.e.belsher.civ@mail.mil. 3. Psychological Health Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency, Silver Spring, MD, USA. 4. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. 5. Division of Services and Intervention Research, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Bethesda, MD, USA. 6. RAND Corporation, Arlington, VA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the growing consensus that collaborative care is effective, limited research has focused on the importance of collaborative care fidelity as it relates to mental health clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship of collaborative care fidelity on symptom trajectories and clinical outcomes among military service members enrolled in a multi-site randomized controlled trial for the treatment of depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). DESIGN: Study data for our analyses came from a two-parallel arm randomized trial that evaluated the effectiveness of a centralized collaborative care model compared to the existing collaborative care model for the treatment of PTSD and depression. All patients were included in the analyses to evaluate how longitudinal trajectories of PTSD and depression scores differed across various collaborative care fidelity groupings. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 666 US Military Service members screening positive for probable PTSD or depression through primary care. MAIN MEASURES: Disease registry data from a web-based clinical management support tool was used to measure collaborative care fidelity for patients enrolled in the trial. Participant depression and PTSD symptoms were collected independently from research survey assessments at four time points across the 1-year trial period. Treatment utilization records were acquired from the Military Health System administrative records to determine mental health service use. KEY RESULTS: Consistent and late fidelity to the collaborative care model predicted an improving symptom trajectory over the course of treatment. This effect was more pronounced for patients with depression than for patients with PTSD. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term fidelity to key collaborative care elements throughout care episodes may improve depression outcomes, particularly for patients with elevated symptoms. More controlled research is needed to further understand the influence of collaborative care fidelity on clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01492348.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Despite the growing consensus that collaborative care is effective, limited research has focused on the importance of collaborative care fidelity as it relates to mental health clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship of collaborative care fidelity on symptom trajectories and clinical outcomes among military service members enrolled in a multi-site randomized controlled trial for the treatment of depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). DESIGN: Study data for our analyses came from a two-parallel arm randomized trial that evaluated the effectiveness of a centralized collaborative care model compared to the existing collaborative care model for the treatment of PTSD and depression. All patients were included in the analyses to evaluate how longitudinal trajectories of PTSD and depression scores differed across various collaborative care fidelity groupings. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 666 US Military Service members screening positive for probable PTSD or depression through primary care. MAIN MEASURES: Disease registry data from a web-based clinical management support tool was used to measure collaborative care fidelity for patients enrolled in the trial. Participantdepression and PTSD symptoms were collected independently from research survey assessments at four time points across the 1-year trial period. Treatment utilization records were acquired from the Military Health System administrative records to determine mental health service use. KEY RESULTS: Consistent and late fidelity to the collaborative care model predicted an improving symptom trajectory over the course of treatment. This effect was more pronounced for patients with depression than for patients with PTSD. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term fidelity to key collaborative care elements throughout care episodes may improve depression outcomes, particularly for patients with elevated symptoms. More controlled research is needed to further understand the influence of collaborative care fidelity on clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01492348.
Authors: Yuhua Bao; Thomas G McGuire; Ya-Fen Chan; Ashley A Eggman; Andrew M Ryan; Martha L Bruce; Harold Alan Pincus; Erin Hafer; Jürgen Unützer Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Amy M Bauer; Vanessa Azzone; Howard H Goldman; Laurie Alexander; Jürgen Unützer; Brenda Coleman-Beattie; Richard G Frank Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Matthew J Press; Ryan Howe; Michael Schoenbaum; Sean Cavanaugh; Ann Marshall; Lindsey Baldwin; Patrick H Conway Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-12-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C S Rosen; M M Matthieu; S Wiltsey Stirman; J M Cook; S Landes; N C Bernardy; K M Chard; J Crowley; A Eftekhari; E P Finley; J L Hamblen; J M Harik; S M Kehle-Forbes; L A Meis; P E Osei-Bonsu; A L Rodriguez; K J Ruggiero; J I Ruzek; B N Smith; L Trent; B V Watts Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2016-11
Authors: John W Williams; Martha Gerrity; Tracey Holsinger; Steve Dobscha; Bradley Gaynes; Allen Dietrich Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Paula P Schnurr; Matthew J Friedman; Thomas E Oxman; Allen J Dietrich; Mark W Smith; Brian Shiner; Elizabeth Forshay; Jiang Gui; Veronica Thurston Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-08-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Christopher J Miller; Andrew Grogan-Kaylor; Brian E Perron; Amy M Kilbourne; Emily Woltmann; Mark S Bauer Journal: Med Care Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Michael A Ruderman; Bo Kim; Kelly Stolzmann; Samantha Connolly; Christopher J Miller; Mark S Bauer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 3.240