Literature DB >> 28139034

Prostate cancer screening practices in a large, integrated health system: 2007-2014.

Anita D Misra-Hebert1,2,3, Bo Hu3, Eric A Klein4, Andrew Stephenson4, Glen B Taksler2, Michael W Kattan3, Michael B Rothberg1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess prostate cancer screening practices in primary care since the initial United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for older men, and to assess primary provider variation associated with prostate cancer screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study population included 160 211 men aged ≥40 years with at least one visit to a primary care clinic in any of the study years in a large, integrated health system. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical record data from January 2007 to December 2014. Yearly rates of screening PSA testing by primary care providers (PCPs), rates of re-screening, and rates of prostate biopsies were assessed.
RESULTS: Annual PSA-screening testing declined from 2007 to 2014 in all age groups, as did biennial and quadrennial screening. Yearly rates declined for men aged ≥70 years, from 22.8% to 8.9%; ages 50-69 years, from 39.2% to 20%; and ages 40-49 years, from 11% to 4.6%. Overall rates were lower for African-American (A-A) men vs non-A-A men; for men with a family history of prostate cancer, rates were similar or slightly higher than for those without a family history. PCP variation associated with ordering of PSA testing did not substantially change after the USPSTF recommendations. While the number of men screened and rates of follow-up prostate cancer screening declined in 2011-2014 compared to 2007-2010, similar re-screening rates were noted for men aged 45-75 years with initial PSA levels of <1 ng/mL or 1-3 ng/mL in both the earlier and later cohorts. For men aged >75 years with initial PSA levels of <3 ng/mL screened in both cohorts, follow-up screening rates were similar. Rates of prostate biopsy declined for men aged ≥70 years in 2014 compared to 2007. For men who had PSA screening, rates of first prostate biopsy increased in later years for A-A men and men with a family history of prostate cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Prostate cancer screening declined from 2007 to 2014 even in higher-risk groups and follow-up screening rates were not related to previous PSA level. However, rates of first prostate biopsy in men who were screened with a PSA test were higher for men with an increased risk of prostate cancer in later years. Variation in PSA testing was noted among PCPs. Future work should further explore sources of variation in screening practices and implementation of risk-based strategies for prostate cancer screening in primary care.
© 2017 The Authors BJU International © 2017 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; cancer screening; primary care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28139034      PMCID: PMC5515687          DOI: 10.1111/bju.13793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  33 in total

1.  Attitudes and beliefs of primary care physicians regarding prostate and colorectal cancer screening in a rural state.

Authors:  George K Philips; Kyndaron Reinier; Takamaru Ashikaga; Robert A Luebbers
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Variation among primary care physicians in prostate-specific antigen screening of older men.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jaramillo; Alai Tan; Liu Yang; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Prostate-specific antigen testing in older men in the USA: data from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system.

Authors:  Emil Scosyrev; Guan Wu; Dragan Golijanin; Edward Messing
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 5.  Prevention and early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Mangesh A Thorat; Gerald Andriole; Otis W Brawley; Powel H Brown; Zoran Culig; Rosalind A Eeles; Leslie G Ford; Freddie C Hamdy; Lars Holmberg; Dragan Ilic; Timothy J Key; Carlo La Vecchia; Hans Lilja; Michael Marberger; Frank L Meyskens; Lori M Minasian; Chris Parker; Howard L Parnes; Sven Perner; Harry Rittenhouse; Jack Schalken; Hans-Peter Schmid; Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger; Fritz H Schröder; Arnulf Stenzl; Bertrand Tombal; Timothy J Wilt; Alicja Wolk
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Trends in Prostate-specific Antigen Screening, Prostate Biopsies, Urology Visits, and Prostate Cancer Treatments From 2000 to 2012.

Authors:  Lauren P Wallner; Jin-Wen Y Hsu; Ronald K Loo; Darryl E Palmer-Toy; Joanne E Schottinger; Steven J Jacobsen
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study.

Authors:  David F Penson; Dale McLerran; Ziding Feng; Lin Li; Peter C Albertsen; Frank D Gilliland; Ann Hamilton; Richard M Hoffman; Robert A Stephenson; Arnold L Potosky; Janet L Stanford
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Determinants of Prostate Specific Antigen Screening among Black Men in the United States in the Contemporary Era.

Authors:  Jesse D Sammon; Deepansh Dalela; Firas Abdollah; Toni K Choueiri; Paul K Han; Moritz Hansen; Paul L Nguyen; Akshay Sood; Mani Menon; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  African American men with very low-risk prostate cancer exhibit adverse oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy: should active surveillance still be an option for them?

Authors:  Debasish Sundi; Ashley E Ross; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Clinician Factors Associated With Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in Older Veterans With Limited Life Expectancy.

Authors:  Victoria L Tang; Ying Shi; Kathy Fung; Jessica Tan; Roxanne Espaldon; Rebecca Sudore; Melisa L Wong; Louise C Walter
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

View more
  15 in total

1.  Prostate-specific antigen testing after the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation: a population-based analysis of electronic health data.

Authors:  Daniel M Frendl; Mara M Epstein; Hassan Fouayzi; Richard Krajenta; Benjamin A Rybicki; Mitchell H Sokoloff
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Factors associated with appropriate and low-value PSA testing.

Authors:  Nathaniel Oswald; Tengda Lin; Benjamin Haaland; Michael Flynn; Kensaku Kawamoto; Kathleen A Cooney; William Lowrance; Heidi A Hanson; Brock O'Neil
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Prostate Cancer: Community Education and Disparities in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Bradley Carthon; Hannah C Sibold; Shannon Blee; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-03-22

4.  Prostate-specific antigen screening: An update of physician beliefs and practices.

Authors:  Ingrid J Hall; Sun Hee Rim; Greta M Massetti; Cheryll C Thomas; Jun Li; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-08-06       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Psychosocial Stress, Glucocorticoid Signaling, and Prostate Cancer Health Disparities in African American Men.

Authors:  Leanne Woods-Burnham; Laura Stiel; Shannalee R Martinez; Evelyn S Sanchez-Hernandez; Herbert C Ruckle; Frankis G Almaguel; Mariana C Stern; Lisa R Roberts; David R Williams; Susanne Montgomery; Carlos A Casiano
Journal:  Cancer Health Disparities       Date:  2020

6.  Multivariable risk-based patient selection for prostate biopsy in a primary health care setting: referral rate and biopsy results from a urology outpatient clinic.

Authors:  Daniël F Osses; Arnout R Alberts; Gonny C F Bausch; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-02

7.  Values and preferences of men for undergoing prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robin W M Vernooij; Lyubov Lytvyn; Hector Pardo-Hernandez; Loai Albarqouni; Carlos Canelo-Aybar; Karen Campbell; Thomas Agoritsas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dragan Ilic; Mia Djulbegovic; Jae Hung Jung; Eu Chang Hwang; Qi Zhou; Anne Cleves; Thomas Agoritsas; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-09-05

9.  The Association of Veterans' PSA Screening Rates With Changes in USPSTF Recommendations.

Authors:  Daniel J Becker; Temitope Rude; Dawn Walter; Chan Wang; Stacy Loeb; Huilin Li; Shannon Ciprut; Matthew Kelly; Steven B Zeliadt; Angela Fagerlin; Herbert Lepor; Scott Sherman; Joseph E Ravenell; Danil V Makarov
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Use of the prostate-specific antigen test in the U.S. for men age 30 to 64 in 2011 to 2017 using a large commercial claims database: Implications for practice interventions.

Authors:  Shahram Shahangian; Krishna P Sharma; Lin Fan; David A Siegel
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-05-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.