Anita D Misra-Hebert1,2,3, Bo Hu3, Eric A Klein4, Andrew Stephenson4, Glen B Taksler2, Michael W Kattan3, Michael B Rothberg1,2. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 2. Center for Value-Based Care Research, Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 3. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 4. Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess prostate cancer screening practices in primary care since the initial United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for older men, and to assess primary provider variation associated with prostate cancer screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study population included 160 211 men aged ≥40 years with at least one visit to a primary care clinic in any of the study years in a large, integrated health system. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical record data from January 2007 to December 2014. Yearly rates of screening PSA testing by primary care providers (PCPs), rates of re-screening, and rates of prostate biopsies were assessed. RESULTS: Annual PSA-screening testing declined from 2007 to 2014 in all age groups, as did biennial and quadrennial screening. Yearly rates declined for men aged ≥70 years, from 22.8% to 8.9%; ages 50-69 years, from 39.2% to 20%; and ages 40-49 years, from 11% to 4.6%. Overall rates were lower for African-American (A-A) men vs non-A-A men; for men with a family history of prostate cancer, rates were similar or slightly higher than for those without a family history. PCP variation associated with ordering of PSA testing did not substantially change after the USPSTF recommendations. While the number of men screened and rates of follow-up prostate cancer screening declined in 2011-2014 compared to 2007-2010, similar re-screening rates were noted for men aged 45-75 years with initial PSA levels of <1 ng/mL or 1-3 ng/mL in both the earlier and later cohorts. For men aged >75 years with initial PSA levels of <3 ng/mL screened in both cohorts, follow-up screening rates were similar. Rates of prostate biopsy declined for men aged ≥70 years in 2014 compared to 2007. For men who had PSA screening, rates of first prostate biopsy increased in later years for A-A men and men with a family history of prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate cancer screening declined from 2007 to 2014 even in higher-risk groups and follow-up screening rates were not related to previous PSA level. However, rates of first prostate biopsy in men who were screened with a PSA test were higher for men with an increased risk of prostate cancer in later years. Variation in PSA testing was noted among PCPs. Future work should further explore sources of variation in screening practices and implementation of risk-based strategies for prostate cancer screening in primary care.
OBJECTIVES: To assess prostate cancer screening practices in primary care since the initial United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for older men, and to assess primary provider variation associated with prostate cancer screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study population included 160 211 men aged ≥40 years with at least one visit to a primary care clinic in any of the study years in a large, integrated health system. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical record data from January 2007 to December 2014. Yearly rates of screening PSA testing by primary care providers (PCPs), rates of re-screening, and rates of prostate biopsies were assessed. RESULTS: Annual PSA-screening testing declined from 2007 to 2014 in all age groups, as did biennial and quadrennial screening. Yearly rates declined for men aged ≥70 years, from 22.8% to 8.9%; ages 50-69 years, from 39.2% to 20%; and ages 40-49 years, from 11% to 4.6%. Overall rates were lower for African-American (A-A) men vs non-A-A men; for men with a family history of prostate cancer, rates were similar or slightly higher than for those without a family history. PCP variation associated with ordering of PSA testing did not substantially change after the USPSTF recommendations. While the number of men screened and rates of follow-up prostate cancer screening declined in 2011-2014 compared to 2007-2010, similar re-screening rates were noted for men aged 45-75 years with initial PSA levels of <1 ng/mL or 1-3 ng/mL in both the earlier and later cohorts. For men aged >75 years with initial PSA levels of <3 ng/mL screened in both cohorts, follow-up screening rates were similar. Rates of prostate biopsy declined for men aged ≥70 years in 2014 compared to 2007. For men who had PSA screening, rates of first prostate biopsy increased in later years for A-A men and men with a family history of prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS:Prostate cancer screening declined from 2007 to 2014 even in higher-risk groups and follow-up screening rates were not related to previous PSA level. However, rates of first prostate biopsy in men who were screened with a PSA test were higher for men with an increased risk of prostate cancer in later years. Variation in PSA testing was noted among PCPs. Future work should further explore sources of variation in screening practices and implementation of risk-based strategies for prostate cancer screening in primary care.
Authors: Jack Cuzick; Mangesh A Thorat; Gerald Andriole; Otis W Brawley; Powel H Brown; Zoran Culig; Rosalind A Eeles; Leslie G Ford; Freddie C Hamdy; Lars Holmberg; Dragan Ilic; Timothy J Key; Carlo La Vecchia; Hans Lilja; Michael Marberger; Frank L Meyskens; Lori M Minasian; Chris Parker; Howard L Parnes; Sven Perner; Harry Rittenhouse; Jack Schalken; Hans-Peter Schmid; Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger; Fritz H Schröder; Arnulf Stenzl; Bertrand Tombal; Timothy J Wilt; Alicja Wolk Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Lauren P Wallner; Jin-Wen Y Hsu; Ronald K Loo; Darryl E Palmer-Toy; Joanne E Schottinger; Steven J Jacobsen Journal: Urology Date: 2015-06-27 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: David F Penson; Dale McLerran; Ziding Feng; Lin Li; Peter C Albertsen; Frank D Gilliland; Ann Hamilton; Richard M Hoffman; Robert A Stephenson; Arnold L Potosky; Janet L Stanford Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jesse D Sammon; Deepansh Dalela; Firas Abdollah; Toni K Choueiri; Paul K Han; Moritz Hansen; Paul L Nguyen; Akshay Sood; Mani Menon; Quoc-Dien Trinh Journal: J Urol Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Debasish Sundi; Ashley E Ross; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Edward M Schaeffer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-06-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Victoria L Tang; Ying Shi; Kathy Fung; Jessica Tan; Roxanne Espaldon; Rebecca Sudore; Melisa L Wong; Louise C Walter Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Daniel M Frendl; Mara M Epstein; Hassan Fouayzi; Richard Krajenta; Benjamin A Rybicki; Mitchell H Sokoloff Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Nathaniel Oswald; Tengda Lin; Benjamin Haaland; Michael Flynn; Kensaku Kawamoto; Kathleen A Cooney; William Lowrance; Heidi A Hanson; Brock O'Neil Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Ingrid J Hall; Sun Hee Rim; Greta M Massetti; Cheryll C Thomas; Jun Li; Lisa C Richardson Journal: Prev Med Date: 2017-08-06 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Leanne Woods-Burnham; Laura Stiel; Shannalee R Martinez; Evelyn S Sanchez-Hernandez; Herbert C Ruckle; Frankis G Almaguel; Mariana C Stern; Lisa R Roberts; David R Williams; Susanne Montgomery; Carlos A Casiano Journal: Cancer Health Disparities Date: 2020
Authors: Robin W M Vernooij; Lyubov Lytvyn; Hector Pardo-Hernandez; Loai Albarqouni; Carlos Canelo-Aybar; Karen Campbell; Thomas Agoritsas Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Dragan Ilic; Mia Djulbegovic; Jae Hung Jung; Eu Chang Hwang; Qi Zhou; Anne Cleves; Thomas Agoritsas; Philipp Dahm Journal: BMJ Date: 2018-09-05
Authors: Daniel J Becker; Temitope Rude; Dawn Walter; Chan Wang; Stacy Loeb; Huilin Li; Shannon Ciprut; Matthew Kelly; Steven B Zeliadt; Angela Fagerlin; Herbert Lepor; Scott Sherman; Joseph E Ravenell; Danil V Makarov Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 13.506