Literature DB >> 26123517

Trends in Prostate-specific Antigen Screening, Prostate Biopsies, Urology Visits, and Prostate Cancer Treatments From 2000 to 2012.

Lauren P Wallner1, Jin-Wen Y Hsu2, Ronald K Loo3, Darryl E Palmer-Toy4, Joanne E Schottinger5, Steven J Jacobsen2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the rates of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, related biopsies and subsequent prostate cancer utilization decreased between 2000 and 2012 in a large, managed care organization.
METHODS: Male members of Kaiser Permanente Southern California who were aged ≥40 years and had no history of prostate cancer (N = 15,326) were passively followed through electronic health plan files from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2012 (N = 1,539,469). The rates of PSA testing, elevated PSA tests, prostate biopsies, prostate cancer treatment (surgery and radiation), and urology visits were calculated per year among eligible men and stratified by age group.
RESULTS: A 59% decrease in PSA screening occurred among men aged ≥75 years beginning in 2008, followed by 49% in ages 65-74, 20% in ages 50-64, and 33% in ages 40-49 years in 2009. However, the number of elevated PSA tests remained largely unchanged in all groups except in men aged ≥75 years (45% decrease). Prostate biopsy rates and urology visits remained consistent among elderly men.
CONCLUSION: Among men in this managed care setting, although there was a sharp decline in PSA testing among men aged ≥75 years after 2008, prostate biopsy rates remained constant, and subsequent prostate cancer treatment remained highest among men in this age group. These results suggest that the guidelines recommending against PSA and the subsequent provider-targeted interventions implemented in this system resulted in decreased screening across age groups and potentially led to more discriminant screening among those aged ≥75 years.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26123517     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.04.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

1.  Prostate cancer screening practices in a large, integrated health system: 2007-2014.

Authors:  Anita D Misra-Hebert; Bo Hu; Eric A Klein; Andrew Stephenson; Glen B Taksler; Michael W Kattan; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  The increase of stage, grading, and metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy during the last decade.

Authors:  Vincent Beck; Boris Schlenker; Annika Herlemann; Maria Apfelbeck; Alexander Buchner; Christian Gratzke; Christian G Stief; Stefan Tritschler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses.

Authors:  Glen Gejerman; Patrick Ciccone; Martin Goldstein; Vincent Lanteri; Burton Schlecker; John Sanzone; Michael Esposito; Sergey Rome; Michael Ciccone; Eric Margolis; Robert Simon; Yijun Guo; Sri-Ram Pentakota; Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-11-02

4.  A continuous fall of PSA use for prostate cancer screening among Brazilian doctors since 2001. Good or bad notice?

Authors:  Fernando Antônio Glasner da Rocha Araújo; Nairo Massakazu Sumita; Ubirajara de Oliveira Barroso
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 5.  The use of electronic health records to inform cancer surveillance efforts: a scoping review and test of indicators for public health surveillance of cancer prevention and control.

Authors:  Sarah Conderino; Stefanie Bendik; Thomas B Richards; Claudia Pulgarin; Pui Ying Chan; Julie Townsend; Sungwoo Lim; Timothy R Roberts; Lorna E Thorpe
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  An Up-to-date Assessment of US Prostate Cancer Incidence Rates by Stage and Race: A Novel Approach Combining Multiple Imputation with Age and Delay Adjustment.

Authors:  Michael B Cook; Lauren M Hurwitz; Ashley M Geczik; Eboneé N Butler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Effects of different interchain linkers on biological activity of an anti-prostate cancer single-chain bispecific antibody.

Authors:  Chao-hui Hao; Qian-he Han; Zhong-jie Shan; Jian-ting Hu; Nan Zhang; Xue-pei Zhang
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.432

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.