Literature DB >> 27042937

Clinician Factors Associated With Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in Older Veterans With Limited Life Expectancy.

Victoria L Tang1, Ying Shi1, Kathy Fung2, Jessica Tan1, Roxanne Espaldon1, Rebecca Sudore1, Melisa L Wong3, Louise C Walter1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Despite guidelines recommending against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in elderly men with limited life expectancy, PSA screening remains common.
OBJECTIVE: To identify clinician characteristics associated with PSA screening rates in older veterans stratified by life expectancy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of 826 286 veterans 65 years or older eligible for PSA screening who had VA laboratory tests performed in 2011 in the VA health care system. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the percentage of men with a screening PSA test in 2011. Limited life expectancy was defined as age of at least 85 years with Charlson comorbidity score of 1 or greater or age of at least 65 years with Charlson comorbidity score of 4 or greater. Primary predictors were clinician characteristics including degree-training level, specialty, age, and sex. We performed log-linear Poisson regression models for the association between each clinician characteristic and PSA screening stratified by patient life expectancy and adjusted for patient demographics and clinician clustering.
RESULTS: In 2011, 466 017 (56%) of older veterans received PSA screening, including 39% of the 203 717 men with limited life expectancy. After adjusting for patient demographics, higher PSA screening rates in patients with limited life expectancy was associated with having a clinician who was an older man and was no longer in training. The PSA screening rates ranged from 27% for men with a physician trainee to 42% for men with an attending physician (P < .001); 22% for men with a geriatrician to 82% for men with a urologist as their clinician (P < .001); 29% for men with a clinician 35 years or younger to 41% for those with a clinician 56 years or older (P < .001); and 38% for men with a female clinician older than 55 years vs 43% for men with a male clinician older than 55 years (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: More than one-third of men with limited life expectancy received PSA screening. Men whose clinician was a physician trainee had substantially lower PSA screening rates than those with an attending physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. Interventions to reduce PSA screening rates in older men with limited life expectancy should be designed and targeted to high-screening clinicians- older male, nontrainee clinicians-for greatest impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27042937      PMCID: PMC5362377          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  19 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care.

Authors:  Niteesh K Choudhry; Robert H Fletcher; Stephen B Soumerai
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Physician clinical experience and inappropriate prostate specific antigen screening: evidence from an Asian country.

Authors:  Nai-Wen Kuo; Herng-Ching Lin; Hsin-Chien Lee
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Variation among primary care physicians in prostate-specific antigen screening of older men.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jaramillo; Alai Tan; Liu Yang; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  National Prostate Cancer Screening Rates After the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Discouraging Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening.

Authors:  Michael W Drazer; Dezheng Huo; Scott E Eggener
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Quality indicators for older adults: preventing unintended harms.

Authors:  Sei J Lee; Louise C Walter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies.

Authors:  Louise C Walter; Daniel Bertenthal; Karla Lindquist; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  PSA testing in office-based clinics: are we testing as much as we think?

Authors:  Hector M González; Brady West; Willie Underwood
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  EHR-based phenome wide association study in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Tomasz Adamusiak; Mary Shimoyama
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2014-04-07
View more
  11 in total

1.  Factors associated with appropriate and low-value PSA testing.

Authors:  Nathaniel Oswald; Tengda Lin; Benjamin Haaland; Michael Flynn; Kensaku Kawamoto; Kathleen A Cooney; William Lowrance; Heidi A Hanson; Brock O'Neil
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Communicating About Stopping Cancer Screening: Comparing Clinicians' and Older Adults' Perspectives.

Authors:  Nancy L Schoenborn; Cynthia M Boyd; Sei J Lee; Danelle Cayea; Craig E Pollack
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2019-05-17

3.  Prostate cancer screening practices in a large, integrated health system: 2007-2014.

Authors:  Anita D Misra-Hebert; Bo Hu; Eric A Klein; Andrew Stephenson; Glen B Taksler; Michael W Kattan; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 4.  The State of Men's Health Services in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Michael Fenstermaker; Sujay Paknikar; Amarnath Rambhatla; Dana A Ohl; Ted A Skolarus; James M Dupree
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Prostate Cancer Screening: A Brief Tool to Incorporate Patient Preferences in a Clinical Encounter.

Authors:  Anita D Misra-Hebert; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Exploring factors that might influence primary-care provider discussion of and recommendation for prostate and colon cancer screening.

Authors:  Christine E Kistler; Maihan Vu; Anne Sutkowi-Hemstreet; Ziya Gizlice; Russell P Harris; Noel T Brewer; Carmen L Lewis; Rowena J Dolor; Colleen Barclay; Stacey L Sheridan
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2018-05-17

7.  Resisting recommended treatment for prostate cancer: a qualitative analysis of the lived experience of possible overdiagnosis.

Authors:  Kirsten McCaffery; Brooke Nickel; Kristen Pickles; Ray Moynihan; Barnett Kramer; Alexandra Barratt; Jolyn Hersch
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Physicians' clinical experience and its association with healthcare quality: a systematised review.

Authors:  Soffien Chadli Ajmi; Karina Aase
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2021-11

Review 9.  Physician associate/assistant contributions to cancer diagnosis in primary care: a rapid systematic review.

Authors:  Jessica Sheringham; Angela King; Ruth Plackett; Anwar Khan; Michelle Cornes; Angelos P Kassianos
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Age, comorbidity, life expectancy, and pulmonary nodule follow-up in older veterans.

Authors:  Melisa L Wong; Ying Shi; Kathy Z Fung; Sarah Ngo; Brett M Elicker; James K Brown; Robert A Hiatt; Victoria L Tang; Louise C Walter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.