Literature DB >> 32797212

The Association of Veterans' PSA Screening Rates With Changes in USPSTF Recommendations.

Daniel J Becker1,2, Temitope Rude1,3, Dawn Walter1,4, Chan Wang4, Stacy Loeb1,4, Huilin Li4, Shannon Ciprut1,3,4, Matthew Kelly1,3,4, Steven B Zeliadt5, Angela Fagerlin6,7, Herbert Lepor2,3, Scott Sherman1,2,4, Joseph E Ravenell4, Danil V Makarov1,4,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2012, the United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) formally recommended against all prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer. Our goal was to characterize PSA screening trends in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) before and after the USPSTF recommendation and to determine if PSA screening was more likely to be ordered based on a veteran's race or age.
METHODS: Using the VA Corporate Data Warehouse, we created 10 annual groups of PSA-eligible men covering 2009-2018. We identified all PSA tests performed in the VA to determine yearly rates of PSA screening. All statistical tests were 2-sided.
RESULTS: The overall rate of PSA testing in the VA decreased from 63.3% in 2009 to 51.2% in 2018 (P < .001). PSA screening rates varied markedly by age group during our study period, with men aged 70-80 years having the highest initial rate and greatest decline (70.6% in 2009 to 48.4% in 2018, P < .001). Men aged 55-69 years had a smaller decline (65.2% in 2009 to 58.9% in 2018, P < .001) whereas the youngest men, aged 40-54 years, had an increase in PSA screening (26.2% in 2009 to 37.8% in 2018, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of PSA screening rates among veterans before and after the 2012 USPSTF recommendation against screening, we found that overall PSA screening decreased only modestly, continuing for more than one-half of the men in our study. Veterans of different races had similar screening rates, suggesting that VA care may minimize racial disparities. Veterans of varying ages experienced statistically significantly differences in PSA screening trends. Published by Oxford University Press 2020.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32797212      PMCID: PMC8096364          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  22 in total

1.  Screening for prostate cancer: recommendation and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-12-03       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Influence of publication of US and European prostate cancer screening trials on PSA testing practices.

Authors:  Steven B Zeliadt; Richard M Hoffman; Ruth Etzioni; John L Gore; Larry G Kessler; Daniel W Lin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010.

Authors:  Andrew M D Wolf; Richard C Wender; Ruth B Etzioni; Ian M Thompson; Anthony V D'Amico; Robert J Volk; Durado D Brooks; Chiranjeev Dash; Idris Guessous; Kimberly Andrews; Carol DeSantis; Robert A Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. Also: update 2001--testing for early lung cancer detection.

Authors:  R A Smith; A C von Eschenbach; R Wender; B Levin; T Byers; D Rothenberger; D Brooks; W Creasman; C Cohen; C Runowicz; D Saslow; V Cokkinides; H Eyre
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  National Prostate Cancer Screening Rates After the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Discouraging Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening.

Authors:  Michael W Drazer; Dezheng Huo; Scott E Eggener
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Colorectal cancer screening among African-American and white male veterans.

Authors:  Nancy C Dolan; M Rosario Ferreira; Marian L Fitzgibbon; Terry C Davis; Alfred W Rademaker; Dachao Liu; June Lee; Michael Wolf; Brian P Schmitt; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update.

Authors:  Kirsten L Greene; Peter C Albertsen; Richard J Babaian; H Ballentine Carter; Peter H Gann; Misop Han; Deborah Ann Kuban; A Oliver Sartor; Janet L Stanford; Anthony Zietman; Peter Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prostate Cancer Incidence and PSA Testing Patterns in Relation to USPSTF Screening Recommendations.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Stacey A Fedewa; Jiemin Ma; Rebecca Siegel; Chun Chieh Lin; Otis Brawley; Elizabeth M Ward
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The impact of recent screening recommendations on prostate cancer screening in a large health care system.

Authors:  Afshin Aslani; Brian J Minnillo; Ben Johnson; Edward E Cherullo; Lee E Ponsky; Robert Abouassaly
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Using the National Health Interview Survey to understand and address the impact of tobacco in the United States: past perspectives and future considerations.

Authors:  Cathy L Backinger; Deirdre Lawrence; Judith Swan; Deborah M Winn; Nancy Breen; Anne Hartman; Rachel Grana; David Tran; Samantha Farrell
Journal:  Epidemiol Perspect Innov       Date:  2008-12-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  Prostate Cancer Screening and Incidence among Aging Persons Living with HIV.

Authors:  Michael S Leapman; Kimberly Stone; Roxanne Wadia; Lesley S Park; Cynthia L Gibert; Matthew B Goetz; Roger Bedimo; Maria Rodriguez-Barradas; Fatma Shebl; Amy C Justice; Sheldon T Brown; Kristina Crothers; Keith M Sigel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 7.600

Review 2.  Should Contemporary Western Guidelines Based on Studies Conducted in the 2000s Be Adopted for the Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Policy for Asian Men in the 2020s?

Authors:  Young Hwii Ko; Byung Hoon Kim
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.494

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.