Literature DB >> 28132859

Improved performance of prostate DCE-MRI using a 32-coil vs. 12-coil receiver array.

Stephen J Riederer1, Eric A Borisch2, Adam T Froemming3, Roger C Grimm4, Akira Kawashima5, Lance A Mynderse6, Joshua D Trzasko7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether acquisition with 32 receiver coils rather than the vendor-recommended 12 coils provides significantly improved performance in 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of the prostate. MATERIALS: The study was approved by the institutional review board and was compliant with HIPAA. 50 consecutive male patients in whom prostate MRI was clinically indicated were prospectively imaged in March 2015 with an accelerated DCE-MRI sequence in which image reconstruction was performed using 12 and 32 coil elements. The two reconstructions were compared quantitatively and qualitatively. The first was done using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and g-factor analysis to assess sensitivity to acceleration. The second was done using a five-point scale by two experienced radiologists using criteria of perceived SNR, artifact, sharpness, and overall preference. Significance was assessed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Extension to T2-weighted spin-echo and diffusion sequences was assessed in phantom studies.
RESULTS: Reconstruction using 32 vs. 12 coil elements provided improved performance in DCE-MRI based on intrinsic SNR (18% higher) and g-factor statistics (14% higher), with a median 32% higher overall SNR within the prostate volume over all subjects. Reconstruction using 32 coils was qualitatively rated significantly improved (p<0.001) vs. 12 coils on the basis of perceived SNR and radiologist preference and equivalent for sharpness and artifact. Phantom studies suggested the improvement in intrinsic SNR could extend to T2-weighted spin-echo and diffusion sequences.
CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of 3D accelerated DCE-MRI studies of the prostate using 32 independent receiver coils provides improved overall performance vs. using 12 coils.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DCE-MRI; Multi-element receiver coil; Prostate MRI

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28132859      PMCID: PMC5410393          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  27 in total

1.  Array compression for MRI with large coil arrays.

Authors:  Martin Buehrer; Klaas P Pruessmann; Peter Boesiger; Sebastian Kozerke
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Byung Kwan Park; Bohyun Kim; Chan Kyo Kim; Hyun Moo Lee; Ghee Young Kwon
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate at 3.0 T: comparison of endorectal coil (ERC) MRI and phased-array coil (PAC) MRI-The impact of SNR on ADC measurement.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; H Alberto Vargas; Gregory Nyman; Amita Shukla-Dave; Oguz Akin; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Detection of Local Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy Using Endorectal Coil MRI at 3 T: Addition of DWI and Dynamic Contrast Enhancement to T2-Weighted MRI.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Robert P Hartman; Adam T Froemming; Clinton E Hagen; Naoki Takahashi; Akira Kawashima
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Bruce J Trock; Misop Han; Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Theodore L DeWeese; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Imaging of prostate cancer local recurrences: why and how?

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Thierry Vitry; Denis Lyonnet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer at 3 T: a study of pharmacokinetic parameters.

Authors:  Iclal Ocak; Marcelino Bernardo; Greg Metzger; Tristan Barrett; Peter Pinto; Paul S Albert; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  3D high temporal and spatial resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the whole brain.

Authors:  Clifton R Haider; Houchun Harry Hu; Norbert G Campeau; John Huston; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Design of k-space channel combination kernels and integration with parallel imaging.

Authors:  Philip J Beatty; Shaorong Chang; James H Holmes; Kang Wang; Anja C S Brau; Scott B Reeder; Jean H Brittain
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  3 in total

1.  Determining the optimal magnetic resonance imaging sequences for the efficient diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorders.

Authors:  Minjun Dong; Qi Sun; Qiang Yu; Xiaofeng Tao; Chi Yang; Weiliu Qiu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-04

2.  Impact of different phased-array coils on the quality of prostate magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Daniel Stocker; Andrei Manoliu; Anton S Becker; Borna K Barth; Daniel Nanz; Markus Klarhöfer; Olivio F Donati
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2021-02-03

3.  Technical Aspects of Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography: Current Status and New Applications.

Authors:  Stephen J Riederer; Eric G Stinson; Paul T Weavers
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.471

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.