| Literature DB >> 28126983 |
Qian Jia1,2, Hongbin Liu1, Yanping Li1,3, Xiaoxi Wang1, Jinju Jia4, Yuying Li5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atherosclerosis plaques in the carotid arteries frequently have been found in patients with stroke. However, the pathogenesis of carotid plaque from asymptomatic to cerebrovascular events is a complex process which is still not completely understood. We aimed to investigate the prognosis of asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaques by use of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) combined with computational fluid dynamics (CFD). MATERIAL AND METHODS We prospectively studied a cohort of 228 participants (mean age 59.21±8.48) with asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaques; mean follow-up duration was 1147.56±224.84 days. Plaque morphology parameters were obtained by MRA analysis. Lumen area (LA) and total vessel area (TVA) were measured, and wall area (WA=TVA-LA) and normalized wall area index (NWI=WA/TVA) were calculated. CFD analysis was performed to evaluate hemodynamic characteristics, including wall pressure (WP) and wall shear stress (WSS). Independent risk factors for stroke were obtained by Cox regression analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operator characteristic (ROC) and Z-statistic test were used to evaluate risk factors. RESULTS Logistics regression analysis showed NWI (OR: 3.472, 95% CI: 2.943-4.096, P=0.11) and WSS (OR: 6.974, 95% CI: 1.070-45.453, P=0.42) were independent risk factors of stroke for patients with asymptomatic carotid plaques. The area under the ROC curve values for WSS, NWI, and WSS+NWI were 0.772, 0.798, and 0.903, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The combination of plaque morphology characteristics NWI and hemodynamic parameter WSS may predict the risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid plaques.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28126983 PMCID: PMC5292986 DOI: 10.12659/msm.902995
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1Flow chart of participants included and excluded for analysis.
Figure 2Reconstruction of 3D vascular model using MIMICS software based on MR data. (A) Thresholding of carotid artery images; (B) Mask of carotid artery images; (C) 3D vascular model constructed with MIMICS; (D) Remeshed model using 3-MATIC.
Figure 3Global tetrahedral mesh elements of the carotid artery.
Figure 4Work flow of CFD analysis.
Baseline characteristics of all participants.
| Stroke group (n=16) | Non-stroke group (n=212) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 57.88±7.79 | 59.55±8.73 | 0.625 |
| Male | 10 (62.50) | 110 (51.89) | 0.442 |
| Smoke | 6 (37.5) | 88 (41.51) | 0.575 |
| Medical history | |||
| Coronary heart disease | 6 (37.50) | 74 (34.91) | 0.401 |
| Hypertension | 8 (50.00) | 136 (64.15) | 0.422 |
| Diabetes | 6 (37.50) | 116 (54.72) | 0.068 |
| Arrhythmia | 2 (12.50) | 54 (25.47) | 0.393 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 4 (25.00) | 60 (28.30) | 0.607 |
| Physical examination | |||
| HR | 77.00±12.86 | 75.55±10.38 | 0.739 |
| SBP | 124.38±17.68 | 125.90±25.63 | 0.875 |
| DBP | 72.25±8.28 | 76.84±15.25 | 0.420 |
| BMI | 26.31±6.95 | 24.43±4.29 | 0.340 |
| Laboratory tests | |||
| ALT | 25.26±12.84 | 39.36±15.32 | 0.600 |
| AST | 35.05±16.11 | 42.70±17.16 | 0.342 |
| γ-GT | 43.14±23.62 | 61.16±29.27 | 0.417 |
| Cr | 78.65±25.67 | 110.74±45.95 | 0.220 |
| BUN | 7.26±3.69 | 7.05±2.50 | 0.855 |
| TG | 1.48±0.29 | 1.31±0.75 | 0.562 |
| T-CH | 3.68±0.76 | 4.03±1.43 | 0.504 |
| HDL | 0.92±0.27 | 0.98±0.29 | 0.540 |
| LDL | 1.99±0.58 | 2.34±0.98 | 0.332 |
| Hb | 129.00±14.96 | 113.19±29.37 | 0.152 |
| RBC | 4.21±0.47 | 3.89±0.99 | 0.386 |
| WBC | 7.51±1.24 | 8.49±2.00 | 0.496 |
| PLT | 209.50±54.87 | 201.61±83.39 | 0.852 |
Values are means ±SD for continuous variables and percentages for dichotomous variables.
Figure 5An example of CFD analysis in carotid artery. (A) Streamline pictures of the flow; (B) Velocity vector picture; (C) Contours of WP; (D) Contours of WSS.
Qualitative of MRA and Hemodynamic parameters of all participants.
| Stroke group (n=16) | Non-stroke group (n=212) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| LA (mm2) | 32.32±9.58 | 34.20±11.11 | 0.124 |
| WA (mm2) | 38.49±11.63 | 37.23±13.32 | 0.139 |
| TVA (mm2) | 70.82±10.81 | 71.43±14.95 | 0.749 |
| NWI | 0.64±0.15 | 0.47±0.19 | 0.043 |
| WSS (Pa) | 7.87±1.34 | 5.86±2.14 | 0.013 |
| WP (Pa) | −1015.75±109.99 | −961.68±199.07 | 0.467 |
Logistics regression analysis of hemodynamic and MRA characteristics of carotid artery.
| OR | 95% Confidence interval | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LA (mm2) | 0.863 | 0.836–0.917 | 0.353 |
| WA (mm2) | 1.082 | 1.063–1.105 | 0.298 |
| TVA (mm2) | 0.980 | 0.924–1.022 | 0.322 |
| NWI | 3.472 | 2.943–4.096 | 0.011 |
| WSS (Pa) | 6.974 | 1.070–45.453 | 0.042 |
| WP (Pa) | 1.005 | 0.997–1.013 | 0.239 |
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for WSS, NWI and WSS+NWI.
| Factors | Area | SE | 95%CI | Youden’s index | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSS | 0.772 | 0.079 | 0.618~0.926 | 0.649 | 87.50 | 77.42 |
| NWI | 0.798 | 0.071 | 0.660~0.937 | 0.520 | 87.50 | 64.52 |
| WSS+NWI | 0.903 | 0.051 | 0.804~1.000 | 0.774 | 100.00 | 77.42 |
Figure 6Receiver operating characteristic curve for NWI, WSS, and WSS+NWI (the areas under the curve were 0.798, 0.722, and 0.903, respectively).