| Literature DB >> 33935800 |
Fengbin Deng1, Changping Mu2, Ling Yang2, Rongqi Yi2, Min Gu2, Kang Li2.
Abstract
Background: Carotid plaque morphology and tissue composition help assess risk stratification of stroke events. Many post-processing image techniques based on CT and MR images have been widely used in related research, such as image segmentation, 3D reconstruction, and computer fluid dynamics. However, the criteria for the 3D numerical model of carotid plaque established by CT and MR angiographic image data remain open to questioning. Method: We accurately duplicated the geometry and simulated it using computer software to make a 3D numerical model. The initial images were obtained by CTA and TOF-MRA. MIMICS (Materialize's interactive medical image control system) software was used to process the images to generate three-dimensional solid models of blood vessels and plaques. The subsequent output was exported to the ANSYS software to generate finite element simulation results for the further hemodynamic study.Entities:
Keywords: CT angiography; MR angiography; aneurysms; carotid plaque; computational fluid dynamic; fluid-solid interaction
Year: 2021 PMID: 33935800 PMCID: PMC8085352 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.645438
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Comparative analysis of image characteristics of CTA and TOF-MRA (A) CTA images of carotid artery and plaque, and yellow and magenta circle showed the plaque area and carotid artery area separately (B) MR images of carotid artery and plaque. (C) The density of carotid artery and plaque density by the two methods. (D) The statistical difference of carotid artery and plaque density between the two methods.
Figure 23D reconstruction of CTA and TOF-MRA images (A–C) show the 3D reconstruction process of the layer scan image in MIMICs software (C) 3D images of blood vessel reconstruction (upper: TOF-MRA, lower: CTA), and the yellow area was the plaque in the blood vessel (D) The segmented plaque, front view, and side view show the shape of the plaque from two directions (E) Schematic diagram: two 3D models were superimposed, and the position difference of their outer surfaces were showed in different colors (F) The position difference of the two models was displayed on the model in the form of a heat map.
Figure 33D reconstruction of vascular lumen for computational fluid dynamics (A) and (B) respectively show the vascular flow lumen (left CTA, right TOF-MRA) reconstructed by the threshold screening method. (C) The frequency of vessel lumen with different diameters in the model schematic diagram. (D) Schematic diagram: the difference between the principle of image segmentation and the results by Boolean operation and threshold filtering method.
Figure 4Fluid dynamic simulation via CTA and TOF-MRA imaging (A) Carotid artery and plaque flow field simulation via CTA imaging (B) carotid artery and plaque flow field simulation via TOF-MRA imaging. (C) Flow distribution difference at entrance and outlet of two models corresponding to CTA and TOF-MRA.