Literature DB >> 32743752

A preliminary study of relationship among the degree of internal carotid artery stenosis, wall shear stress on MR angiography and 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT.

Yasukage Takami1, Takashi Norikane2, Yuka Yamamoto2, Kengo Fujimoto2, Katsuya Mitamura2, Masanobu Okauchi3, Masahiko Kawanishi3, Yoshihiro Nishiyama2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This preliminary study was undertaken to evaluate relationship among the degree of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis, wall shear stress (WSS) by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) on magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and 18F-FDG uptake of ICA on PET/CT.
METHODS: A total of 40 carotid arteries in 20 patients with carotid atherosclerotic disease were examined with MRA and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Atherosclerotic risk factors were assessed in all patients. Degree of ICA stenosis was calculated according to NASCET method. CFD analysis was performed and maximum WSS (WSSmax) was measured. 18F-FDG uptake in ICA was quantified using maximum target-to-blood pool ratio (TBRmax).
RESULTS: Atherosclerotic risk factors did not affect imaging findings. There were significant correlations between WSSmax and degree of ICA stenosis (ρ = .81, P < .001), WSSmax and TBRmax (ρ = .64, P < .001), and TBRmax and degree of ICA stenosis (ρ = .50, P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results indicate that there may be significant correlations among the degree of ICA stenosis, WSSmax and TBRmax in patients with carotid artery stenosis.
© 2020. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDG; PET; carotid artery stenosis; computational fluid dynamics; wall shear stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32743752     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-020-02300-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  37 in total

1.  Reanalysis of the final results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial.

Authors:  P M Rothwell; S A Gutnikov; C P Warlow
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  Stroke Caused by Extracranial Disease.

Authors:  Kevin M Barrett; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerosis identifies vulnerable carotid plaques.

Authors:  Antoine Millon; Jean-Louis Mathevet; Loic Boussel; Peter L Faries; Zahi A Fayad; Philippe C Douek; Patrick Feugier
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Carotid artery plaque morphology and composition in relation to incident cardiovascular events: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Anna E H Zavodni; Bruce A Wasserman; Robyn L McClelland; Antoinette S Gomes; Aaron R Folsom; Joseph F Polak; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Carotid Plaque Lipid Content and Fibrous Cap Status Predict Systemic CV Outcomes: The MRI Substudy in AIM-HIGH.

Authors:  Jie Sun; Xue-Qiao Zhao; Niranjan Balu; Moni B Neradilek; Daniel A Isquith; Kiyofumi Yamada; Gádor Cantón; John R Crouse; Todd J Anderson; John Huston; Kevin O'Brien; Daniel S Hippe; Nayak L Polissar; Chun Yuan; Thomas S Hatsukami
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03

6.  Characterisation of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and histology.

Authors:  G Puppini; F Furlan; N Cirota; G Veraldi; Q Piubello; S Montemezzi; G Gortenuti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  In vivo 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging provides a noninvasive measure of carotid plaque inflammation in patients.

Authors:  Ahmed Tawakol; Raymond Q Migrino; Gregory G Bashian; Shahinaz Bedri; David Vermylen; Ricardo C Cury; Denise Yates; Glenn M LaMuraglia; Karen Furie; Stuart Houser; Henry Gewirtz; James E Muller; Thomas J Brady; Alan J Fischman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI--initial results.

Authors:  Norihide Takaya; Chun Yuan; Baocheng Chu; Tobias Saam; Hunter Underhill; Jianming Cai; Nam Tran; Nayak L Polissar; Carol Isaac; Marina S Ferguson; Gwenn A Garden; Steven C Cramer; Kenneth R Maravilla; Beverly Hashimoto; Thomas S Hatsukami
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.

Authors:  H J Barnett; D W Taylor; M Eliasziw; A J Fox; G G Ferguson; R B Haynes; R N Rankin; G P Clagett; V C Hachinski; D L Sackett; K E Thorpe; H E Meldrum; J D Spence
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  18F-NaF and 18F-FDG as molecular probes in the evaluation of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Mikaela L McKenney-Drake; Mateen C Moghbel; Koosha Paydary; Mouhamad Alloosh; Sina Houshmand; Sharon Moe; Ali Salavati; Jeffrey M Sturek; Paul R Territo; Connie Weaver; Thomas J Werner; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen; Michael Sturek; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Small Molecular NIR-II Fluorophores for Cancer Phototheranostics.

Authors:  Hanming Dai; Qing Shen; Jinjun Shao; Wenjun Wang; Fan Gao; Xiaochen Dong
Journal:  Innovation (Camb)       Date:  2021-01-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.