Literature DB >> 24676083

Hemodynamic parameters distribution of upstream, stenosis center, and downstream sides of plaques in carotid artery with different stenosis: a MRI and CFD study.

Binbin Sui1, Peiyi Gao2, Yan Lin1, Lina Jing1, Shengjun Sun1, Haiqiang Qin3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Histopathological studies have shown significant differences in plaque components and surface conditions between upstream and downstream of the stenosis. It can be deduced that the flow status near the plaques is different from the flow status at the upstream side, stenosis center, or downstream side of the plaque.
PURPOSE: To study the hemodynamic parameter distribution in different locations near atherosclerotic plaques in the carotid arteries with different stenosis degrees.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven patients were recruited in this study. CE-MRA was performed to obtain the carotid three-dimensional surface data and the stenosis degrees were calculated. The hemodynamic parameters including wall shear stress (WSS), pressure, and velocity near the plaques were obtained by computational fluid dynamic (CFD) method. Local hemodynamics parameters were analyzed and compared between different stenosis degree groups, and between upstream, stenosis center, and downstream sides of plaques. Relative ratio of velocity, WSS, and pressure values in different locations was calculated and compared.
RESULTS: Fourteen carotid arteries (with 4 mild, 6 moderate, and 4 severe stenosis) were analyzed. Significant differences were found in Pressure max (P = 0.025), Pressure mean (P = 0.020), and Pressure min (P = 0.026) between three stenosis groups. It showed significant differences in Vmin (P < 0.001) and WSSmin (P < 0.001) between three different locations. It showed upstream to downstream ratio of WSSmax (P = 0.034) and WSSmean value (P = 0.042) was significantly different between mild and moderate/severe groups. Significant differences were found in upstream to stenosis center ratio of Pressure max value (P = 0.018), Pressure mean value (P = 0.029), and Pressure min value (P = 0.026), as well as in stenosis center to downstream ratio of Pressure min value (P = 0.042).
CONCLUSION: Velocity, WSS, pressure, and relative ratio of these parameters have certain trends in distribution around the plaques in the carotid arteries. © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid artery; atherosclerotic plaques; computational fluid dynamics; hemodynamic; magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24676083     DOI: 10.1177/0284185114526713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  7 in total

1.  Design of a cone-and-plate device for controlled realistic shear stress stimulation on endothelial cell monolayers.

Authors:  Marco Franzoni; Irene Cattaneo; Bogdan Ene-Iordache; Alberto Oldani; Paolo Righettini; Andrea Remuzzi
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Combination of Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Computational Fluid Dynamics May Predict the Risk of Stroke in Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Plaques.

Authors:  Qian Jia; Hongbin Liu; Yanping Li; Xiaoxi Wang; Jinju Jia; Yuying Li
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-01-27

3.  The Computational Fluid Dynamics Analyses on Hemodynamic Characteristics in Stenosed Arterial Models.

Authors:  Yue Zhou; Chunhian Lee; Jingying Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Characteristics of Wall Shear Stress and Pressure of Intracranial Atherosclerosis Analyzed by a Computational Fluid Dynamics Model: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Zimo Chen; Haiqiang Qin; Jia Liu; Bokai Wu; Zaiheng Cheng; Yong Jiang; Liping Liu; Lina Jing; Xinyi Leng; Jing Jing; Yilong Wang; Yongjun Wang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Alterations in plantar vessel blood flow in patients with mild diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  Qiang Zhou; Zhihui Qian; Maoguang Yang; Jing Liu; Jianan Wu; Luquan Ren; Lei Ren
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2022-01

Review 6.  The Rheology of the Carotid Sinus: A Path Toward Bioinspired Intervention.

Authors:  Andrew Iskander; Coskun Bilgi; Rotem Naftalovich; Ilker Hacihaliloglu; Tolga Berkman; Daniel Naftalovich; Niema Pahlevan
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-10

7.  A patient-specific lumped-parameter model of coronary circulation.

Authors:  Zheng Duanmu; Min Yin; Xueling Fan; Xilan Yang; Xiaoyu Luo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.