April M Young1, Abby E Rudolph2, Amanda E Su3, Lee King4, Susan Jent4, Jennifer R Havens5. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington; Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington. Electronic address: april.young@uky.edu. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA. 3. University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington. 4. Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington. 5. Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington; University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Network analysis has become increasingly popular in epidemiologic research, but the accuracy of data key to constructing risk networks is largely unknown. Using network data from people who use drugs (PWUDs), the study examined how accurately PWUD reported their network members' (i.e., alters') names and ages. METHODS: Data were collected from 2008 to 2010 from 503 PWUD residing in rural Appalachia. Network ties (n = 897) involved recent (past 6 months) sex, drug cousage, and/or social support. Participants provided alters' names, ages, and relationship-level characteristics; these data were cross-referenced to that of other participants to identify participant-participant relationships and to determine the accuracy of reported ages (years) and names (binary). RESULTS: Participants gave alters' exact names and ages within two years in 75% and 79% of relationships, respectively. Accurate name was more common in relationships that were reciprocally reported and those involving social support and male alters. Age was more accurate in reciprocal ties and those characterized by kinship, sexual partnership, recruitment referral, and financial support, and less accurate for ties with older alters. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants reported alters' characteristics accurately, and name accuracy was not significantly different in relationships involving drug-related and/or sexual behavior compared to those not involving these behaviors.
PURPOSE: Network analysis has become increasingly popular in epidemiologic research, but the accuracy of data key to constructing risk networks is largely unknown. Using network data from people who use drugs (PWUDs), the study examined how accurately PWUD reported their network members' (i.e., alters') names and ages. METHODS: Data were collected from 2008 to 2010 from 503 PWUD residing in rural Appalachia. Network ties (n = 897) involved recent (past 6 months) sex, drug cousage, and/or social support. Participants provided alters' names, ages, and relationship-level characteristics; these data were cross-referenced to that of other participants to identify participant-participant relationships and to determine the accuracy of reported ages (years) and names (binary). RESULTS:Participants gave alters' exact names and ages within two years in 75% and 79% of relationships, respectively. Accurate name was more common in relationships that were reciprocally reported and those involving social support and male alters. Age was more accurate in reciprocal ties and those characterized by kinship, sexual partnership, recruitment referral, and financial support, and less accurate for ties with older alters. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants reported alters' characteristics accurately, and name accuracy was not significantly different in relationships involving drug-related and/or sexual behavior compared to those not involving these behaviors.
Authors: S R Friedman; A Neaigus; B Jose; R Curtis; M Goldstein; G Ildefonso; R B Rothenberg; D C Des Jarlais Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Nicky McCreesh; Simon D W Frost; Janet Seeley; Joseph Katongole; Matilda N Tarsh; Richard Ndunguse; Fatima Jichi; Natasha L Lunel; Dermot Maher; Lisa G Johnston; Pam Sonnenberg; Andrew J Copas; Richard J Hayes; Richard G White Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Lauren N Carroll; Alan P Au; Landon Todd Detwiler; Tsung-Chieh Fu; Ian S Painter; Neil F Abernethy Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Samuel R Friedman; Leslie Williams; April M Young; Jennifer Teubl; Dimitrios Paraskevis; Evangelia Kostaki; Carl Latkin; Danielle German; Pedro Mateu-Gelabert; Honoria Guarino; Tetyana I Vasylyeva; Britt Skaathun; John Schneider; Ania Korobchuk; Pavlo Smyrnov; Georgios Nikolopoulos Journal: Curr HIV/AIDS Rep Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 5.071
Authors: April M Young; Kathryn E Lancaster; Sarann Bielavitz; Miriam R Elman; Ryan R Cook; Gillian Leichtling; Edward Freeman; Angela T Estadt; Morgan Brown; Rhonda Alexander; Caiti Barrie; Kandi Conn; Rhody Elzaghal; Lisa Maybrier; Renee McDowell; Cathy Neal; Jodi Lapidus; Elizabeth N Waddell; P Todd Korthuis Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Gwenyth O Lee; Pamela J Surkan; Jon Zelner; Maribel Paredes Olórtegui; Pablo Peñataro Yori; Ramya Ambikapathi; Laura E Caulfield; Robert H Gilman; Margaret N Kosek Journal: SSM Popul Health Date: 2018-02-23