Literature DB >> 28126091

Accuracy of name and age data provided about network members in a social network study of people who use drugs: implications for constructing sociometric networks.

April M Young1, Abby E Rudolph2, Amanda E Su3, Lee King4, Susan Jent4, Jennifer R Havens5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Network analysis has become increasingly popular in epidemiologic research, but the accuracy of data key to constructing risk networks is largely unknown. Using network data from people who use drugs (PWUDs), the study examined how accurately PWUD reported their network members' (i.e., alters') names and ages.
METHODS: Data were collected from 2008 to 2010 from 503 PWUD residing in rural Appalachia. Network ties (n = 897) involved recent (past 6 months) sex, drug cousage, and/or social support. Participants provided alters' names, ages, and relationship-level characteristics; these data were cross-referenced to that of other participants to identify participant-participant relationships and to determine the accuracy of reported ages (years) and names (binary).
RESULTS: Participants gave alters' exact names and ages within two years in 75% and 79% of relationships, respectively. Accurate name was more common in relationships that were reciprocally reported and those involving social support and male alters. Age was more accurate in reciprocal ties and those characterized by kinship, sexual partnership, recruitment referral, and financial support, and less accurate for ties with older alters.
CONCLUSIONS: Most participants reported alters' characteristics accurately, and name accuracy was not significantly different in relationships involving drug-related and/or sexual behavior compared to those not involving these behaviors.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data accuracy; Drug abuse; HIV; Hepatitis C; Intravenous drug abuse; Rural health; Self-report; Social networks

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28126091      PMCID: PMC5283838          DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  30 in total

1.  Sociometric risk networks and risk for HIV infection.

Authors:  S R Friedman; A Neaigus; B Jose; R Curtis; M Goldstein; G Ildefonso; R B Rothenberg; D C Des Jarlais
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Partner Naming and Forgetting: Recall of Network Members.

Authors:  David C Bell; Benedetta Belli-McQueen; Ali Haider
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2007-05

Review 3.  Social network-based interventions to promote condom use: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kaidi Wang; Katherine Brown; Song-Ying Shen; Joseph Tucker
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2011-10

4.  Evaluation of respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  Nicky McCreesh; Simon D W Frost; Janet Seeley; Joseph Katongole; Matilda N Tarsh; Richard Ndunguse; Fatima Jichi; Natasha L Lunel; Dermot Maher; Lisa G Johnston; Pam Sonnenberg; Andrew J Copas; Richard J Hayes; Richard G White
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Women underestimate the age of their partners during survey interviews: implications for HIV risk associated with age mixing in northern Malawi.

Authors:  Stéphane Helleringer; Hans-Peter Kohler; James Mkandawire
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 6.  Visualization and analytics tools for infectious disease epidemiology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lauren N Carroll; Alan P Au; Landon Todd Detwiler; Tsung-Chieh Fu; Ian S Painter; Neil F Abernethy
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Probabilistic record linkage is a valid and transparent tool to combine databases without a patient identification number.

Authors:  Nora Méray; Johannes B Reitsma; Anita C J Ravelli; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Injection Drug Users' Involvement In Drug Economy: Dynamics of Sociometric and Egocentric Social Networks.

Authors:  Cui Yang; Carl Latkin; Stephen Q Muth; Abby Rudolph
Journal:  Connect (Tor)       Date:  2013-07

9.  Spatial, temporal and relational patterns in respondent-driven sampling: evidence from a social network study of rural drug users.

Authors:  April M Young; Abby E Rudolph; Deane Quillen; Jennifer R Havens
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Network structure and the risk for HIV transmission among rural drug users.

Authors:  A M Young; A B Jonas; U L Mullins; D S Halgin; J R Havens
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2013-09
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Network Research Experiences in New York and Eastern Europe: Lessons for the Southern US in Understanding HIV Transmission Dynamics.

Authors:  Samuel R Friedman; Leslie Williams; April M Young; Jennifer Teubl; Dimitrios Paraskevis; Evangelia Kostaki; Carl Latkin; Danielle German; Pedro Mateu-Gelabert; Honoria Guarino; Tetyana I Vasylyeva; Britt Skaathun; John Schneider; Ania Korobchuk; Pavlo Smyrnov; Georgios Nikolopoulos
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.071

2.  Overlooked Threats to Respondent Driven Sampling Estimators: Peer Recruitment Reality, Degree Measures, and Random Selection Assumption.

Authors:  Jianghong Li; Thomas W Valente; Hee-Sung Shin; Margaret Weeks; Alexei Zelenev; Gayatri Moothi; Heather Mosher; Robert Heimer; Eduardo Robles; Greg Palmer; Chinekwu Obidoa
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2018-07

3.  Using Network and Spatial Data to Better Target Overdose Prevention Strategies in Rural Appalachia.

Authors:  Abby E Rudolph; April M Young; Jennifer R Havens
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  Statistical adjustment of network degree in respondent-driven sampling estimators: venue attendance as a proxy for network size among young MSM.

Authors:  Kayo Fujimoto; Ming Cao; Lisa M Kuhns; Dennis Li; John A Schneider
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2018-02-03

5.  Peer-based Retention Of people who Use Drugs in Rural Research (PROUD-R2): a multisite, randomised, 12-month trial to compare efficacy of standard versus peer-based approaches to retain rural people who use drugs in research.

Authors:  April M Young; Kathryn E Lancaster; Sarann Bielavitz; Miriam R Elman; Ryan R Cook; Gillian Leichtling; Edward Freeman; Angela T Estadt; Morgan Brown; Rhonda Alexander; Caiti Barrie; Kandi Conn; Rhody Elzaghal; Lisa Maybrier; Renee McDowell; Cathy Neal; Jodi Lapidus; Elizabeth N Waddell; P Todd Korthuis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Privacy and Confidentiality Considerations for Collecting HIV Risk Network Data among Men who Have Sex with Men and Implications for Constructing Valid Risk Networks.

Authors:  Abby E Rudolph; April M Young
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2019-09-19

7.  Peer influence of injection drug use cessation among dyads in rural eastern Kentucky.

Authors:  Abby E Rudolph; Elizabeth Upton; Madelyn J McDonald; April M Young; Jennifer R Havens
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2019-11-15

Review 8.  Network-Based Research on Rural Opioid Use: an Overview of Methods and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  April M Young; Abby E Rudolph; Jennifer R Havens
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.071

9.  A Gold-Standard for Entity Resolution within Sexually Transmitted Infection Networks.

Authors:  John Schneider; L Philip Schumm; Maya Fraser; Vijay Yeldandi; Chuanhong Liao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Social connectedness is associated with food security among peri-urban Peruvian Amazonian communities.

Authors:  Gwenyth O Lee; Pamela J Surkan; Jon Zelner; Maribel Paredes Olórtegui; Pablo Peñataro Yori; Ramya Ambikapathi; Laura E Caulfield; Robert H Gilman; Margaret N Kosek
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2018-02-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.