Literature DB >> 23184464

Network structure and the risk for HIV transmission among rural drug users.

A M Young1, A B Jonas, U L Mullins, D S Halgin, J R Havens.   

Abstract

Research suggests that structural properties of drug users' social networks can have substantial effects on HIV risk. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the structural properties of Appalachian drug users' risk networks could lend insight into the potential for HIV transmission in this population. Data from 503 drug users recruited through respondent-driven sampling were used to construct a sociometric risk network. Network ties represented relationships in which partners had engaged in unprotected sex and/or shared injection equipment. Compared to 1,000 randomly generated networks, the observed network was found to have a larger main component and exhibit more cohesiveness and centralization than would be expected at random. Thus, the risk network structure in this sample has many structural characteristics shown to be facilitative of HIV transmission. This underscores the importance of primary prevention in this population and prompts further investigation into the epidemiology of HIV in the region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23184464      PMCID: PMC3600060          DOI: 10.1007/s10461-012-0371-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Behav        ISSN: 1090-7165


  38 in total

1.  Sociometric risk networks and risk for HIV infection.

Authors:  S R Friedman; A Neaigus; B Jose; R Curtis; M Goldstein; G Ildefonso; R B Rothenberg; D C Des Jarlais
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Risking risk: the influence of types of capital and social networks on the injection practices of drug users.

Authors:  Anne M Lovell
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 3.  Sexual networks: implications for the transmission of sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Fredrik Liljeros; Christofer R Edling; Luis A Nunes Amaral
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.700

4.  Performance of an oral fluid rapid HIV-1/2 test: experience from four CDC studies.

Authors:  Kevin P Delaney; Bernard M Branson; Apurva Uniyal; Peter R Kerndt; Patrick A Keenan; Krishna Jafa; Ann D Gardner; Denise J Jamieson; Marc Bulterys
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 5.  Network analysis in public health: history, methods, and applications.

Authors:  Douglas A Luke; Jenine K Harris
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 6.  Social network-based interventions to promote condom use: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kaidi Wang; Katherine Brown; Song-Ying Shen; Joseph Tucker
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2011-10

7.  Transition from first illicit drug use to first injection drug use among rural Appalachian drug users: a cross-sectional comparison and retrospective survival analysis.

Authors:  April M Young; Jennifer R Havens
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  The role of sexual partnership networks in the epidemiology of gonorrhea.

Authors:  A C Ghani; J Swinton; G P Garnett
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Injection risk behaviors among rural drug users: implications for HIV prevention.

Authors:  Jennifer R Havens; Carrie B Oser; Carl G Leukefeld
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2011-05

10.  Harnessing peer networks as an instrument for AIDS prevention: results from a peer-driven intervention.

Authors:  R S Broadhead; D D Heckathorn; D L Weakliem; D L Anthony; H Madray; R J Mills; J Hughes
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.792

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  Using Social Networks to Understand and Overcome Implementation Barriers in the Global HIV Response.

Authors:  Guy Harling; Alexander C Tsai
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.731

2.  Quantitative methods of identifying the key nodes in the illegal wildlife trade network.

Authors:  Nikkita Gunvant Patel; Chris Rorres; Damien O Joly; John S Brownstein; Ray Boston; Michael Z Levy; Gary Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Rural and urban injection drug use in Puerto Rico: Network implications for human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus infection.

Authors:  Courtney Thrash; Melissa Welch-Lazoritz; Gertrude Gauthier; Bilal Khan; Roberto Abadie; Kirk Dombrowski; Sandra Miranda De Leon; Yadira Rolon Colon
Journal:  J Ethn Subst Abuse       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 1.507

4.  Drug users' willingness to encourage social, sexual, and drug network members to receive an HIV vaccine: a social network analysis.

Authors:  A M Young; R J DiClemente; D S Halgin; C E Sterk; J R Havens
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2014-09

5.  Rural risk environments for hepatitis c among young adults in appalachian kentucky.

Authors:  David H Cloud; Umedjon Ibragimov; Nadya Prood; April M Young; Hannah L F Cooper
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2019-05-18

Review 6.  Implementing Treatment of Opioid-Use Disorder in Rural Settings: a Focus on HIV and Hepatitis C Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Jennifer R Havens; Sharon L Walsh; P Todd Korthuis; David A Fiellin
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.071

7.  Examining the Social Context of Injection Drug Use: Social Proximity to Persons Who Inject Drugs Versus Geographic Proximity to Persons Who Inject Drugs.

Authors:  Abby E Rudolph; April M Young; Jennifer R Havens
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Social network structure and HIV infection among injecting drug users in Lithuania: gatekeepers as bridges of infection.

Authors:  V Anna Gyarmathy; Irma Caplinskiene; Saulius Caplinskas; Carl A Latkin
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2014-03

9.  Correlates to seroprevalent herpes simplex virus type 2 among rural Appalachian drug users.

Authors:  Dustin B Stephens; April M Young; Ursula L Mullins; Jennifer R Havens
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.327

10.  A simulative comparison of respondent driven sampling with incentivized snowball sampling--the "strudel effect".

Authors:  V Anna Gyarmathy; Lisa G Johnston; Irma Caplinskiene; Saulius Caplinskas; Carl A Latkin
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.