OBJECTIVE: To describe the technical approach and subsequent validation of the probabilistic linkage of the three anonymous, population-based Dutch Perinatal Registries (LVR1 of midwives, LVR2 of obstetricians, and LNR of pediatricians/neonatologists). These registries do not share a unique identification number. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A combination of probabilistic and deterministic record linkage techniques were applied using information about the mother, delivery, and child(ren) to link three known registries. Rewards for agreement and penalties for disagreement between corresponding variables were calculated based on the observed patterns of agreement and disagreements using maximum likelihood estimation. Special measures were developed to overcome linking difficulties in twins. A subsample of linked and nonlinked pairs was validated. RESULTS: Independent validation confirmed that the procedure successfully linked the three Dutch perinatal registries despite nontrivial error rates in the linking variables. CONCLUSIONS: Probabilistic linkage techniques allowed the creation of a high-quality linked database from crude registry data. The developed procedures are generally applicable in linkage of health data with partially identifying information. They provide useful source date even if cohorts are only partly overlapping and if within the cohort, multiple entities and twins exist.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the technical approach and subsequent validation of the probabilistic linkage of the three anonymous, population-based Dutch Perinatal Registries (LVR1 of midwives, LVR2 of obstetricians, and LNR of pediatricians/neonatologists). These registries do not share a unique identification number. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A combination of probabilistic and deterministic record linkage techniques were applied using information about the mother, delivery, and child(ren) to link three known registries. Rewards for agreement and penalties for disagreement between corresponding variables were calculated based on the observed patterns of agreement and disagreements using maximum likelihood estimation. Special measures were developed to overcome linking difficulties in twins. A subsample of linked and nonlinked pairs was validated. RESULTS: Independent validation confirmed that the procedure successfully linked the three Dutch perinatal registries despite nontrivial error rates in the linking variables. CONCLUSIONS: Probabilistic linkage techniques allowed the creation of a high-quality linked database from crude registry data. The developed procedures are generally applicable in linkage of health data with partially identifying information. They provide useful source date even if cohorts are only partly overlapping and if within the cohort, multiple entities and twins exist.
Authors: P C Rose; H S Schaaf; K du Preez; J A Seddon; A J Garcia-Prats; K Zimri; R Dunbar; A C Hesseling Journal: Public Health Action Date: 2013-09-21
Authors: Miranda Tromp; Nora Méray; Anita C J Ravelli; Johannes B Reitsma; Gouke J Bonsel Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2008-06-25 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Vivienne J Zhu; Marc J Overhage; James Egg; Stephen M Downs; Shaun J Grannis Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Michael Pine; Niranjana M Kowlessar; Jason L Salemi; Jill Miyamura; David S Zingmond; Nicole E Katz; Joe Schindler Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Myrthe J C S Peelen; Brenda M Kazemier; Anita C J Ravelli; Christianne J M de Groot; Joris A M van der Post; Ben W J Mol; Marjolein Kok; Petra J Hajenius Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Mehmet Kuzu; Murat Kantarcioglu; Elizabeth Ashley Durham; Csaba Toth; Bradley Malin Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-07-30 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Rosemary Karmel; Phil Anderson; Diane Gibson; Ann Peut; Stephen Duckett; Yvonne Wells Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Samantha J Lain; Charles S Algert; Vitomir Tasevski; Jonathan M Morris; Christine L Roberts Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2009-07-09 Impact factor: 4.615