Gainer R Jasa1, Mayumi Shimizu2, Kazutoshi Okamura3, Kenji Tokumori4, Yohei Takeshita2, Warangkana Weerawanich3, Kazunori Yoshiura3. 1. 1 Oral Radiology Division, University of the Republic, Montevideo, Uruguay. 2. 2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan. 3. 3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan. 4. 4 Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Fukuoka Medical Technology, Teikyo University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of exposure parameters and image-processing methods when using CBCT to detect clear and unclear mandibular canals (MCs). METHODS: 24 dry half mandibles were divided into 2 groups with clear and unclear MCs based on a previous CBCT study. Mandibles were scanned using a CBCT system with varying exposure parameters (tube voltages 60 kV, 70 kV and 90 kV; and tube currents 2 mA, 5 mA, 10 mA and 15 mA) to obtain a total of 144 scans. The images were processed with different slice thicknesses using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Five radiologists evaluated the cross-sectional images of the first molar region to detect the MCs. The diagnostic accuracy of varying exposure parameters and image-processing conditions was compared with the area under the curve (Az) in receiver-operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: The Az values for clear MCs were higher than those for unclear MCs (p < 0.0001). With increasing exposure voltages and currents, Az values increased, but no significant differences were found with high voltages and currents in clear MCs (p = 1.0000 and p = 0.9340). The Az values of serial images were higher than those of overlaid images (p < 0.0001), and those for thicker slices were higher than those for thinner slices (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that detection of unclear MCs requires either higher exposure parameters or processing of the images with thicker slices. To detect clear MCs, lower exposure parameters can be used.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of exposure parameters and image-processing methods when using CBCT to detect clear and unclear mandibular canals (MCs). METHODS: 24 dry half mandibles were divided into 2 groups with clear and unclear MCs based on a previous CBCT study. Mandibles were scanned using a CBCT system with varying exposure parameters (tube voltages 60 kV, 70 kV and 90 kV; and tube currents 2 mA, 5 mA, 10 mA and 15 mA) to obtain a total of 144 scans. The images were processed with different slice thicknesses using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Five radiologists evaluated the cross-sectional images of the first molar region to detect the MCs. The diagnostic accuracy of varying exposure parameters and image-processing conditions was compared with the area under the curve (Az) in receiver-operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: The Az values for clear MCs were higher than those for unclear MCs (p < 0.0001). With increasing exposure voltages and currents, Az values increased, but no significant differences were found with high voltages and currents in clear MCs (p = 1.0000 and p = 0.9340). The Az values of serial images were higher than those of overlaid images (p < 0.0001), and those for thicker slices were higher than those for thinner slices (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that detection of unclear MCs requires either higher exposure parameters or processing of the images with thicker slices. To detect clear MCs, lower exposure parameters can be used.
Authors: Letícia F Haas; Kamile Dutra; André Luís Porporatti; Luis A Mezzomo; Graziela De Luca Canto; Carlos Flores-Mir; Márcio Corrêa Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: A Ekestubbe; K Gröndahl; S Ekholm; P E Johansson; H G Gröndahl Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants Date: 1996 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: K Kamburoğlu; S Murat; C Kılıç; S Yüksel; H Avsever; A Farman; W C Scarfe Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Daniel Almeida Ferreira Barbosa; Diego Santiago de Mendonça; Francisco Samuel Rodrigues de Carvalho; Lúcio Mitsuo Kurita; Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva; Frederico Sampaio Neves; Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa Journal: Oral Radiol Date: 2021-02-20 Impact factor: 1.852