Literature DB >> 28124742

The small height of an anastomotic colonic doughnut is an independent risk factor of anastomotic leakage following colorectal resection: results of a prospective study on 154 consecutive cases.

François Cauchy1, Solafah Abdalla1, Christophe Penna1, Benjamin Angliviel1, Benoit Lambert1, Bruno Costaglioli1, Antoine Brouquet2, Stéphane Benoist1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the influence of morphological characteristics of anastomotic doughnuts on the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) after double-stapled colorectal anastomosis.
METHODS: This single-center prospective study enrolled all patients undergoing double-stapled colorectal anastomosis between December 2012 and December 2015. Maximal diameter and minimal and maximal heights and widths of both colonic and rectal doughnuts were measured by surgeons in the operating room. Their influence on the risk of AL was analyzed on uni- and multivariate models.
RESULTS: One hundred fifty-four patients were included; 92 (59.7%) were operated on for malignancy. Colorectal anastomoses > and <10 cm above the anal verge were performed in 96 (62.3%) and 58 (37.7%) patients, respectively. AL occurred in 17 (11.0%). The minimal height of the colonic doughnut (CD) was the only measurement significantly associated with an increased risk of AL (p = 0.026). A cutoff value of 4.5 mm for the CD determined on the ROC curve (AUC 0.685, p = 0.013) yielded the best sensitivity (61.4%) and specificity (82.4%) to predict AL. On multivariate analysis, a height of the CD <4.5 mm (OR 5.743, 95% IC 1.476-22.346, p = 0.012), malignant disease (OR 8.821, 95% IC 1.051-74.006, p = 0.045), and American Society of Anesthesiologists score >2 (OR 3.408, 95% IC 1.017-11.418, p = 0.047) were the only independent risk factors of AL.
CONCLUSION: The CD's minimal height influences the risk of AL. Its routine measurement during operation, along with other risk factors, could help to decide which patients could benefit from a diverting stoma or the creation of a new anastomosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic doughnuts; Anastomotic leakage; Colorectal surgery; Mechanical colorectal anastomosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28124742     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2769-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  27 in total

1.  Triple-staple technique for low rectal anastomoses eliminates the purse-string suture and facilitates stapled colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  Suhal Mahid; Susan Galandiuk; Britt Christmas; Dan Tran
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a case-control study.

Authors:  P Jestin; L Påhlman; U Gunnarsson
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Diverting stoma after low anterior resection: more arguments in favor.

Authors:  Alexis B Ulrich; Christoph Seiler; Nuh Rahbari; Jürgen Weitz; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Stapled colorectal anastomoses: peroperative integrity of the anastomosis and risk of postoperative leakage.

Authors:  F Lazorthes; P Chiotassol
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Factor contributing to leakage of colonic anastomoses.

Authors:  T R Schrock; C W Deveney; J E Dunphy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Intraoperative air testing of colorectal anastomoses: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  J D Beard; M L Nicholson; R D Sayers; D Lloyd; N W Everson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients.

Authors:  A Vignali; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J W Milsom; J M Church; T L Hull; S A Strong; J R Oakley
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group.

Authors:  Jun Seok Park; Gyu-Seog Choi; Seon Hahn Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim; Nam Kyu Kim; Kang Young Lee; Sung Bum Kang; Ji Yeon Kim; Kil Yeon Lee; Byung Chun Kim; Byung Noe Bae; Gyung Mo Son; Sun Il Lee; Hyun Kang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The AFC score: validation of a 4-item predicting score of postoperative mortality after colorectal resection for cancer or diverticulitis: results of a prospective multicenter study in 1049 patients.

Authors:  Arnaud Alves; Yves Panis; Georges Mantion; Karem Slim; Fabrice Kwiatkowski; Eric Vicaut
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Malignancy is a risk factor for postoperative infectious complications after elective colorectal resection.

Authors:  Thibault Crombe; Jérôme Bot; Mathieu Messager; Vianney Roger; Christophe Mariette; Guillaume Piessen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  3 in total

1.  The prognostic significance of stapler doughnuts' examination at low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Eleftherios Spartalis; Demetrios Moris; Antonios Athanasiou; Stylianos Kykalos; Dimitrios Dimitroulis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Bacteriological concentration of peritoneal drainage fluid could make an early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage following rectal resection.

Authors:  Wei Ge; Hai-Yan Gong; Yong-Quan Xia; Li-Hua Shao; Han Shen; Gang Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Economic Analysis of Leak Complications in Anastomoses Performed with Powered versus Manual Circular Staplers in Left-Sided Colorectal Resections: A US-Based Cost Analysis.

Authors:  Esther Pollack; Stephen Johnston; William J Petraiuolo; Sanjoy Roy; Thibaut Galvain
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-06-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.