Thibault Crombe1,2, Jérôme Bot1,2, Mathieu Messager1,2, Vianney Roger3, Christophe Mariette1,2,4, Guillaume Piessen5,6,7. 1. Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Hospital Claude Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Place de Verdun, 59037, Lille cedex, France. 2. University of Lille Nord de France, Lille, France. 3. Mathilde Clinic, Rouen, France. 4. Inserm UMR-S 1172, Jean Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team 5 "Mucins, epithelial differentiation and carcinogenesis, Lille, France. 5. Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Hospital Claude Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Place de Verdun, 59037, Lille cedex, France. guillaume.piessen@chru-lille.fr. 6. University of Lille Nord de France, Lille, France. guillaume.piessen@chru-lille.fr. 7. Inserm UMR-S 1172, Jean Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team 5 "Mucins, epithelial differentiation and carcinogenesis, Lille, France. guillaume.piessen@chru-lille.fr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Patient and technical factors influencing the postoperative infectious complications (ICs) after elective colorectal resections are satisfactorily described. However, the underlying disease-related factors have not been extensively evaluated. This study aimed to measure the effect of malignancy on postoperative surgical site and extra surgical site infections after elective colorectal resection. METHODS: This study is a bicentric retrospective matched pair study of prospectively gathered data. Between 2004 and 2013, 1104 consecutive patients underwent colorectal resection in two centers. Patients undergoing elective resection with supraperitoneal anastomosis for benign diseases (excluding inflammatory bowel disease) (group B, n = 305) were matched to randomly selected patients with malignancy (group M, n = 305). The matching variables were age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, malnutrition, type of resection, and surgical approach. We compared the 30-day IC rates between patients with benign diseases (group B) and malignancy (group M). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for ICs. RESULTS: Group M had a higher overall rate of IC (25.6 vs 16.1 %, P = 0.004) as well as a higher risk of extra surgical site infections (P = 0.007) and anastomotic leakage (P = 0.039). The independent risk factors for ICs were malignancy (odds ratio (OR) = 2.02; P = 0.002), age ≥70 years (OR = 1.73, P = 0.018), tobacco history (OR = 1.87; P = 0.030), and obesity (OR = 1.68; P = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Malignancy, age, tobacco history, and obesity increase the risk of ICs after colorectal resection. Improvement of the modifiable risk factors, increased compliance with an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program in the overall population, and optimization of immune function in patients with malignancy should be considered.
PURPOSE:Patient and technical factors influencing the postoperative infectious complications (ICs) after elective colorectal resections are satisfactorily described. However, the underlying disease-related factors have not been extensively evaluated. This study aimed to measure the effect of malignancy on postoperative surgical site and extra surgical site infections after elective colorectal resection. METHODS: This study is a bicentric retrospective matched pair study of prospectively gathered data. Between 2004 and 2013, 1104 consecutive patients underwent colorectal resection in two centers. Patients undergoing elective resection with supraperitoneal anastomosis for benign diseases (excluding inflammatory bowel disease) (group B, n = 305) were matched to randomly selected patients with malignancy (group M, n = 305). The matching variables were age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, malnutrition, type of resection, and surgical approach. We compared the 30-day IC rates between patients with benign diseases (group B) and malignancy (group M). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for ICs. RESULTS: Group M had a higher overall rate of IC (25.6 vs 16.1 %, P = 0.004) as well as a higher risk of extra surgical site infections (P = 0.007) and anastomotic leakage (P = 0.039). The independent risk factors for ICs were malignancy (odds ratio (OR) = 2.02; P = 0.002), age ≥70 years (OR = 1.73, P = 0.018), tobacco history (OR = 1.87; P = 0.030), and obesity (OR = 1.68; P = 0.039). CONCLUSION:Malignancy, age, tobacco history, and obesity increase the risk of ICs after colorectal resection. Improvement of the modifiable risk factors, increased compliance with an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program in the overall population, and optimization of immune function in patients with malignancy should be considered.
Authors: Malaika S Vlug; Jan Wind; Markus W Hollmann; Dirk T Ubbink; Huib A Cense; Alexander F Engel; Michael F Gerhards; Bart A van Wagensveld; Edwin S van der Zaag; Anna A W van Geloven; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Miguel A Cuesta; Willem A Bemelman Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Rajesh Pendlimari; Robert R Cima; Bruce G Wolff; John H Pemberton; Marianne Huebner Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2012-02-08 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Efrat L Amitay; Prudence R Carr; Anton Gies; Dana Clarissa Laetsch; Hermann Brenner Journal: Clin Transl Gastroenterol Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Pedro Moya; Leticia Soriano-Irigaray; Jose Manuel Ramirez; Alessandro Garcea; Olga Blasco; Francisco Javier Blanco; Carlo Brugiotti; Elena Miranda; Antonio Arroyo Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 1.889