Literature DB >> 17592296

The AFC score: validation of a 4-item predicting score of postoperative mortality after colorectal resection for cancer or diverticulitis: results of a prospective multicenter study in 1049 patients.

Arnaud Alves1, Yves Panis, Georges Mantion, Karem Slim, Fabrice Kwiatkowski, Eric Vicaut.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present prospective study was to validate externally a 4-item predictive score of mortality after colorectal surgery (the AFC score) by testing its generalizability on a new population. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: We have recently reported, in a French prospective multicenter study, that age older than 70 years, neurologic comorbidity, underweight (body weight loss >10% in <6 months), and emergency surgery significantly increased postoperative mortality after resection for cancer or diverticulitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June to September 2004, 1049 consecutive patients (548 men and 499 women) with a mean age of 67 +/- 14 years, undergoing open or laparoscopic colorectal resection, were prospectively included. The AFC score was validated in this population. We assessed also the predictive value of other scores, such as the "Glasgow" score and the ASA score. To express and compare the predictive value of the different scores, a receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated.
RESULTS: Postoperative mortality rate was 4.6%. Variables already identified as predictors of mortality and used in the AFC score were also found to be associated with a high odds ratio in this study: emergency surgery, body weight loss >10%, neurologic comorbidity, and age older than 70 years in a multivariate logistic model. The validity of the AFC score in this population was found very high based both on the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test (P = 0.37) and on the area under the ROC curve (0.89). We also found that discriminatory capacity was higher than other currently used risk scoring systems such as the Glasgow or ASA score.
CONCLUSION: The present prospective study validated the AFC score as a pertinent predictive score of postoperative mortality after colorectal surgery. Because it is based on only 4 risk factors, the AFC score can be used in daily practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17592296      PMCID: PMC1899212          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180602ff5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  24 in total

1.  Evaluation of outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection with POSSUM, Portsmouth POSSUM and colorectal POSSUM.

Authors:  W L Law; C M Lam; Y M Lee
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  The New England colorectal cancer quality project: a prospective multi-institutional feasibility study.

Authors:  Neil H Hyman; Clifford Y Ko; Peter A Cataldo; Jeffrey L Cohen; Patricia L Roberts
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity.

Authors:  D R Prytherch; M S Whiteley; B Higgins; P C Weaver; W G Prout; S J Powell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Nutritional approach in malnourished surgical patients: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Luca Gianotti; Luca Nespoli; Giovanni Radaelli; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-02

5.  Comparative audit of colorectal resection with the POSSUM scoring system.

Authors:  P M Sagar; M N Hartley; B Mancey-Jones; P C Sedman; J May; J Macfie
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  W E Longo; K S Virgo; F E Johnson; C A Oprian; A M Vernava; T P Wade; M A Phelan; W G Henderson; J Daley; S F Khuri
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 8.  Risk scoring in surgical patients.

Authors:  H J Jones; L de Cossart
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM: implementation issues in a United States health care system for prediction of outcome for colon cancer resection.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore; Anthony J Warmuth; Conor P Delaney; Paris P Tekkis; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Preoperative serum albumin level as a predictor of operative mortality and morbidity: results from the National VA Surgical Risk Study.

Authors:  J Gibbs; W Cull; W Henderson; J Daley; K Hur; S F Khuri
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-01
View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Past, Present, and Factors Impacting Future Dissemination.

Authors:  Jason Ferreira; Paul Akerman
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

2.  Efficacy and safety of laparo-endoscopic resections of colorectal neoplasia: A systematic review.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Roberto Passera; Marco Migliore; Roberto Cirocchi; Giuseppe Galloro; Raffaele Manta; Mario Morino
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Preoperative functional health status may predict outcomes after elective colorectal surgery for malignancy.

Authors:  Ozgen Isik; Nuri Okkabaz; Jeffrey Hammel; Feza H Remzi; Emre Gorgun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Predictive risk factors for intra- and postoperative complications in 526 laparoscopic sigmoid resections due to recurrent diverticulitis: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Philipp Kirchhoff; Daniel Matz; Selim Dincler; Peter Buchmann
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Risk factors for mortality-morbidity after emergency-urgent colorectal surgery.

Authors:  K Skala; P Gervaz; N Buchs; I Inan; M Secic; B Mugnier-Konrad; P Morel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Can postoperative complications be predicted by a routine CT scan on day 5? A study of 78 laparoscopic colorectal resections.

Authors:  M Wagner; M Zappa; L Maggiori; F Bretagnol; V Vilgrain; Y Panis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Open versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in the elderly population.

Authors:  Aaron J Quyn; Osama Moussa; Fergus Millar; David M Smith; Robert Jc Steele
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-06-27

8.  Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients: is it safe and beneficial?

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masatoshi Oya; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Meiki Fukuda; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Masashi Ueno; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Is the benefit of laparoscopy maintained in elderly patients undergoing rectal cancer resection? An analysis of 446 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Gilles Manceau; Elisabeth Hain; Léon Maggiori; Cécile Mongin; Justine Prost À la Denise; Yves Panis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies.

Authors:  Philipp Kirchhoff; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2010-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.