| Literature DB >> 28123367 |
Sung-Han Lin1, Wen-Chuin Hsu2, Shu-Hang Ng3, Jur-Shan Cheng4, Oleksandr Khegai5, Chin-Chang Huang6, Yao-Liang Chen7, Yi-Chun Chen2, Jiun-Jie Wang8.
Abstract
Background: The loss of cortical neuron environment integrity is the hallmark of neurodegeneration diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). To reveal the microenvironment changes in cerebral cortex, the current study aimed to examine the changes of mean diffusivity (MD) in parcellated brain among AD, aMCI patients and normal controls (NC).Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer disease; cerebral cortex; diffusion MRI; mild cognitive impairment; parcellation
Year: 2017 PMID: 28123367 PMCID: PMC5225103 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
General characteristics of the study participants and neuropsychological evaluation scores.
| Mean age | 65.4 (6.2) | 68.3 (6.7) | 68.3 (7.7) |
| Gender (Male/Female) | 22/18 | 20/21 | 11/17 |
| Education | 10.4 (4.3) | 6.8 (5.1) | 6.1 (5.2) |
| Hypertension (w/o) | 8/40 | 24/41 | 11/28 |
| ε4 carriers | 0 | 9 | 4 |
| ε4 noncarriers | 22 | 14 | 12 |
| Unknown | 18 | 18 | 12 |
| MMSE (Maximum 30) | 28.6 (1.1) | 23.7 (4.9) | 14.6 (6.1) |
| Clinical dementia rating (CDR) | 0.0 (0.0) | 0.5 (0.0) | 1.0 (0.6) |
| Word sequence learning-recall | 3.4 (1.7) | 0.2 (0.4) | 0.0 (0.0) |
| Visual reproduction II | 12.1 (2.7) | 8.0 (2.9) | 5.3 (1.3) |
| Logic memory II | 12.3 (2.8) | 6.7 (3.9) | 2.4 (1.1) |
| Semantic association of verbal fluency | 34.8 (7.1) | 28.7 (6.9) | 15.4 (7.4) |
| WCST-S completed categories | 5.4 (1.1) | 3.4 (1.9) | 1.7 (2.9) |
| WAIS-III digit symbol-scaled | 10.7 (2.7) | 8.5 (3.3) | 5.0 (2.7) |
| WAIS-III digit span-scaled | 11.7 (2.8) | 9.8 (2.8) | 7.6 (2.3) |
| 3-D block construction models | 28.7 (0.6) | 26.9 (3.7) | 19.1 (10.1) |
| Object naming test | 16.0 (0.0) | 15.9 (0.5) | 13.1 (4.4) |
Mean (standard deviation); MMSE, Mini–mental state examination; WCST-S, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-short form; WAIS-III, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III;
indicates significant difference among three groups.
indicates significant difference between patients and normal controls.
indicates significant different between aMCI and AD patients.
Figure 1Regions with increased mean diffusivity (MD) and gray matter loss in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, compared to normal controls (A) and amenstic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) patients (B). The regions with significant increase MD are plotted with violet and the regions with gary matter atophy are plotted with warm colors, and the brighter color means the more severe atrophy in gray matter. The major atrophy regions were labeled with anatomy.
Figure 2Increased mean diffusivity (MD) pattern among patint with amenstic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Initial MD increase can be observed in aMCI patients only located in the right fusiform (violet color), when compared to normal controls (NC). Compared to aMCI patients, AD patients showed expended regions of increased MD (yellow color). In the later stage, increaed MD regions can be observed in every lobe of cortical brain in AD patinets (red color), compared to NC. This spatial distribution pattern of regions with increased MD is similar to the post-mortem pathology of amyloid deposition in AD patients (Braak and Braak, 1991).
Figure 3Mean diffusivity (MD) in parcellated cortical regions. The mean diffusivity in parcellated cortical regions with significant difference between Alzhimer's disease (AD) patients and normal controls (NC). Cortical MD of AD patients (solid), amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) (gray) patietents and NC (blank) are plotted. Stars indicate the significant difference between aMCI patients and NC (p < 0.0005). Pounds indicate the significant differences between aMCI and NC (p < 0.0005). Plus indicate the significant differences between aMCI and AD patients (p < 0.0005). The AAL cortical regions are arranged into temporal (A), frontal (B), occipital (C), parietal (D), and the deep nuclear (E). The regions are numbered according to the anatomical automatic labeling template. Mean diffusivity is given in units of *10−3 mm2/s.
Figure 4The tract-based spatial statistics results of aMCI patients (A) and AD patients (B), when compared to normal controls. The white matter tract skelotons are plotted in green lines and the pixels with significant MD increase are marked with red on tracts. The major regions with increased MD were labeled with anatomy.
Regions with significant correlation between MD and neuropsychological scores.
| MMSE | Olfa. R. (−0.41, 1.21E-5) | Cing. Ant. R. (-0.41, 9.62E-6) |
| Cing. Post. L. (−0.46, 8.67E-7) | Cing. Post. R. (-0.45, 1.22E-6) | |
| Hipp. L. (−0.53, 6.90E-9) | Hipp. R. (−0.50, 4.83E-8) | |
| ParaHipp. L. (−0.54, 1.23E-9) | ParaHipp. R. (−0.44, 3.77E-6) | |
| Calc. L. (−0.43, 2.79E-6) | Calc. R. (−0.38, 4.79E-5) | |
| Ling L. (−0.43, 4.07E-6) | Occi. Mid. L. (−0.39, 4.13E-5) | |
| Fusi. L. (−0.58, 5.51E-11) | Fusi. R. (−0.53, 5.26E-9) | |
| Caud. R. (−0.42, 9.08E-6) | Thal. L. (−0.38, 5.09E-5) | |
| Temp. Inf. L. (−0.45, 1.51E-6) | ||
| CDR | Olfa. R. (0.42, 1.03E-5) | Hipp. L. (0.44, 2.00E-6) |
| Hipp.R. (0.54, 3.02E-9) | ParaHipp. L. (0.44, 2.25E-6) | |
| ParaHipp. R. (0.47, 6.07E-7) | Amyg. L. (0.41, 2.72E-5) | |
| Amyg. R. (0.49, 1.21E-7) | Fusi. L. (0.44, 1.54E-6) | |
| Fusi. R. (0.51, 3.59E-8) | Caud. L. (0.42, 7.39E-6) | |
| Caud. R. (0.43, 3.76E-6) | Temp. Inf. L. (0.40, 1.98E-5) | |
| Learning recall | Front. Inf. Oper. R. (−0.40, 4.06E-5) | Hipp. L. (−0.48, 5.82E-7) |
| Fusi. R. (−0.40, 3.64E-5) | ||
| Visual reprodiction | Hipp. L. (−0.46, 1.54E-6) | Hipp. R. (−0.41, 1.65E-5) |
| ParaHipp. L. (−0.53, 1.00E-8) | ParaHipp. R. (−0.50, 7.91E-8) | |
| Amyg. L. (−0.40, 5.14E-5) | Fusi. L. (−0.52, 2.31E-8) | |
| Fusi. R. (−0.50, 9.87E-8) | Temp. Inf. L. (−0.40, 3.12E-5) | |
| Logic memory | Hipp. L. (−0.56, 7.80E-10) | Hipp. R. (−0.48, 3.64E-7) |
| ParaHipp. L. (−0.52, 1.49E-8) | ParaHipp. R. (−0.53, 1.11E-8) | |
| Amyg. L. (−0.54, 3.38E-6) | Calc. L. (−0.44, 2.91E-5) | |
| Fusi. L. (−0.50, 6.71E-8) | Fusi. R. (−0.50, 1.45E-7) | |
| Temp. Inf. L. (−0.45, 1.87E-6) | ||
| Semantic association of verbal fluency | Front. Sup. Orb. L. (−0.43, 5.25E-6) | Front. Mid. L. (−0.40, 3.00E-5) |
| Front. Mid. R. (−0.45, 1.63E-5) | Front. Mid. Orb. L. (−0.43, 6.80E-6) | |
| Front. Inf. Oper. R. (−0.41, 2.05E-5) | Front. Inf. Tri. L. (−0.41, 1.64E-5) | |
| Olfa. L. (−0.51, 4.25E-8) | Olfa. R. (−0.45, 2.71E-6) | |
| Cing. Ant. L. (−0.48, 2.93E-7) | Cing. Post L. (−0.47, 5.75E-7) | |
| Cing. Ant. R. (−0.45, 1.92E-6) | Hipp. L. (−0.50, 9.70E-8) | |
| Cing. Post R. (−0.43, 5.21E-6) | ParaHipp. L. (−0.49, 1.67E-7) | |
| Hipp. R. (−0.51, 3.21E-8) | Amyg. R. (−0.41, 2.53E-5) | |
| ParaHipp. R. (−0.59, 8.46E-11) | Calc. R. (−0.46, 9.59E-7) | |
| Calc. L. (−0.44, 3.83E-6) | Ling. L. (−0.48, 3.16E-7) | |
| Cuneus L. (−0.41, 1.61E-5) | Fusi. R. (−0.54, 7.71E-9) | |
| Fusi. L. (−0.62, 2.77E-12) | Caud. L. (−0.45, 1.97E-6) | |
| Precuneus L. (−0.44, 3.33E-6) | Temp. Sup. L. (−0.43, 6.01E-6) | |
| Caud. R. (−0.45, 1.80E-6) | Temp. Mid. L. (−0.57, 3.56E-10) | |
| Temp. Sup. R. (−0.41, 1.73E-5) | Temp. Pole Mid. L. (−0.42, 1.21E-5) | |
| Temp. Mid. R. (−0.47, 5.53E-7) | Temp. Inf. L. (−0.60, 2.42E-11) | |
| Temp. Pole Mid. R. (−0.41, 1.79E-5) | Temp. Inf. R. (−0.46, 1.16E-6) | |
| WCST-S completed categories | ParaHipp. R. (−0.43, 1.11E-5) | |
| WAIS-III digit symbol-scaled | Hipp. L. (−0.45, 7.81E-6) | Hipp. R. (−0.44, 1.49E-5) |
| ParaHipp. R. (−0.43, 2.64E-5) | Calc. L. (−0.42, 2.84E-5) | |
| Ling. L. (−0.41, 4.11E-5) | Fusi. L. (−0.49, 7.46E-7) | |
| Fusi. R. (−0.50, 6.06E-7) | ||
| 3-D block construction Models | Cing. Ant. R. (−0.39, 4.16E-5) | Cing. Mid. R. (−0.40, 3.05E-5) |
| Cing. Post L. (−0.41, 1.61E-5) | Cing. Post R. (−0.45, 2.02E-6) | |
| Hipp. L. (−0.42, 1.25E-5) | Calc. L. (−0.47, 6.86E-7) | |
| Cuneus L. (−0.49, 1.39E-7) | Ling. L. (−0.41, 2.00E-5) | |
| Occi. Mid. L. (−0.55, 2.56E-9) | Occi. Inf. L. (−0.41, 1.94E-5) | |
| Fusi. L. (−0.54, 4.05E-9) | Fusi. R. (−0.48, 3.79E-7) | |
| Angular L. (−0.39, 5.07E-5) | Angular R. (−0.43, 5.53E-6) | |
| Precuneus L. (−0.43, 6.85E-6) | Temp. Mid. L. (−0.41, 1.71E-5) | |
| Temp. Inf. L. (−0.41, 1.66E-5) | Temp. Inf. R. (−0.41, 1.56E-5) | |
| Object naming test | Hipp. L. (−0.46, 9.50E-7) | Hipp. R. (−0.40, 2.91E-5) |
| ParaHipp. L. (−0.51, 2.39E-8) | Amyg. L. (−0.41, 3.19E-5) | |
| Amyg. R. (−0.44, 4.28E-6) | Occi. Mid. L. (−0.49, 1.13E-7) | |
| Fusi. L. (−0.59, 5.47E-11) | Fusi. R. (−0.54, 6.17E-9) | |
| Parietal Sup. L. (−0.39, 3.46E-5) | Parietal Sup. R. (−0.39, 3.41E-5) | |
| Parietal Inf. L. (−0.47, 5.88E-7) | Angular L. (−0.41, 1.51E-5) | |
| Temp. Sup. L. (−0.39, 3.19E-5) | Temp. Pole Sup. L. (−0.47, 4.77E-7) | |
| Temp. Mid. L. (−0.60, 1.68E-11) | Temp. Mid. R. (−0.43, 5.46E-6) | |
| Temp. Pole Mid. R. (−0.46, 6.21E-7) | Temp. Inf. L. (−0.66, 2.74E-14) | |
Regions with significant correlation between to MD and neurophyscological scores. R., right side; L., Left side; Front. Sup. Orb., superior frontal gyrus; Front. Mid., Middle frontal gyrus; Front. Inf. Oper, opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus; Front. Inf. Tri., triangular part of inferior frontal gyrus; Olfa., olfactory gyrus; Cing. Ant., anterior cingulum; Cing. Mid., middle part of cingulum; Cing. Post, posterior cingulum; Hipp., hippocampus; ParaHipp., parahippocampal gyrus; Amyg., amygdala; Calc., calcarine gyrus; Cuneus, cuneus gyrus; Ling., lingual gyrus; Occi. Mid., middle occipital gyrus; Occi. Inf., inferior occipital gyrus; Fusi., fusiform gyrus; Parietal Sup., Superior parietal gyrus; Parietal Inf., inferior parietal gyrus; Angular, angular gyrus; Caud., caudate nucleus; Thal., thalamus; Temp. Sup., superior temporal gyrus; Temp. Pole Sup., temporal pole of superior temporal gyrus; Temp. Mid., middle temporal gyrus; Temp. Pole Mid., temporal pole of middle temporal gyrus; Temp. Inf., inferior temporal gyrus.