BACKGROUND: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies have shown significant cross-sectional differences among normal controls (NC) mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients in several fiber tracts in the brain, but longitudinal assessment is needed. METHODS: We studied 75 participants (25 NC, 25 amnestic MCI, and 25 mild AD) at baseline and 3 months later, with both imaging and clinical evaluations. Fractional anisotropy (FA) was analyzed in regions of interest (ROIs) in: (1) fornix, (2) cingulum bundle, (3) splenium, and (4) cerebral peduncles. Clinical data included assessments of clinical severity and cognitive function. Cross-sectional and longitudinal differences in FA, within each ROI, were analyzed with generalized estimating equations (GEE). RESULTS: Cross-sectionally, AD patients had lower FA than NC (p<0.05) at baseline and 3 months in the fornix and anterior portion of the cingulum bundle. Compared to MCI, AD cases had lower FA (p<0.05) in these regions and the splenium at 0 and 3 months. Both the fornix and anterior cingulum correlated across all clinical cognitive scores; lower FA in these ROIs corresponded to worse performance. Over the course of 3 months, when the subjects were clinically stable, the ROIs were also largely stable. CONCLUSIONS: Using DTI, findings indicate FA is decreased in specific fiber tracts among groups of subjects that vary along the spectrum from normal to AD, and that this measure is stable over short periods of time. The fornix is a predominant outflow tract of the hippocampus and may be an important indicator of AD progression.
BACKGROUND: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies have shown significant cross-sectional differences among normal controls (NC) mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients in several fiber tracts in the brain, but longitudinal assessment is needed. METHODS: We studied 75 participants (25 NC, 25 amnestic MCI, and 25 mild AD) at baseline and 3 months later, with both imaging and clinical evaluations. Fractional anisotropy (FA) was analyzed in regions of interest (ROIs) in: (1) fornix, (2) cingulum bundle, (3) splenium, and (4) cerebral peduncles. Clinical data included assessments of clinical severity and cognitive function. Cross-sectional and longitudinal differences in FA, within each ROI, were analyzed with generalized estimating equations (GEE). RESULTS: Cross-sectionally, AD patients had lower FA than NC (p<0.05) at baseline and 3 months in the fornix and anterior portion of the cingulum bundle. Compared to MCI, AD cases had lower FA (p<0.05) in these regions and the splenium at 0 and 3 months. Both the fornix and anterior cingulum correlated across all clinical cognitive scores; lower FA in these ROIs corresponded to worse performance. Over the course of 3 months, when the subjects were clinically stable, the ROIs were also largely stable. CONCLUSIONS: Using DTI, findings indicate FA is decreased in specific fiber tracts among groups of subjects that vary along the spectrum from normal to AD, and that this measure is stable over short periods of time. The fornix is a predominant outflow tract of the hippocampus and may be an important indicator of AD progression.
Authors: S E Rose; F Chen; J B Chalk; F O Zelaya; W E Strugnell; M Benson; J Semple; D M Doddrell Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Peter Kalus; Johannes Slotboom; Jürgen Gallinat; Richard Mahlberg; Katja Cattapan-Ludewig; Roland Wiest; Thomas Nyffeler; Caroline Buri; Andrea Federspiel; Dieter Kunz; Gerhard Schroth; Claus Kiefer Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2005-12-06 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Hangyi Jiang; Peter C M van Zijl; Jinsuh Kim; Godfrey D Pearlson; Susumu Mori Journal: Comput Methods Programs Biomed Date: 2006-01-18 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Andreas Fellgiebel; Matthias J Müller; Paulo Wille; Paulo R Dellani; Armin Scheurich; Lutz G Schmidt; Peter Stoeter Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2005-01-12 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Denise Head; Randy L Buckner; Joshua S Shimony; Laura E Williams; Erbil Akbudak; Thomas E Conturo; Mark McAvoy; John C Morris; Abraham Z Snyder Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Michelle M Mielke; Ozioma C Okonkwo; Kenichi Oishi; Susumu Mori; Sarah Tighe; Michael I Miller; Can Ceritoglu; Timothy Brown; Marilyn Albert; Constantine G Lyketsos Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2012 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Y Likitjaroen; T Meindl; U Friese; M Wagner; K Buerger; H Hampel; S J Teipel Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2011-08-05 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Andrea C Bozoki; Igor O Korolev; Nathan C Davis; Lori A Hoisington; Kevin L Berger Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: K Kantarci; M L Senjem; R Avula; B Zhang; A R Samikoglu; S D Weigand; S A Przybelski; H A Edmonson; P Vemuri; D S Knopman; B F Boeve; R J Ivnik; G E Smith; R C Petersen; C R Jack Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-05-18 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Robert J Dawe; David A Bennett; Julie A Schneider; Sue E Leurgans; Aikaterini Kotrotsou; Patricia A Boyle; Konstantinos Arfanakis Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Alexandra Badea; Lauren Kane; Robert J Anderson; Yi Qi; Mark Foster; Gary P Cofer; Neil Medvitz; Anne F Buckley; Andreas K Badea; William C Wetsel; Carol A Colton Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Sarah K Tighe; Kenichi Oishi; Susumu Mori; Gwenn S Smith; Marilyn Albert; Constantine G Lyketsos; Michelle M Mielke Journal: J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2012 Impact factor: 2.198
Authors: Anqi Qiu; Kenichi Oishi; Michael I Miller; Constantine G Lyketsos; Susumu Mori; Marilyn Albert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-03-22 Impact factor: 3.240