Literature DB >> 28119969

A three dimensional in vitro glial scar model to investigate the local strain effects from micromotion around neural implants.

Kevin C Spencer1, Jay C Sy2, Roberto Falcón-Banchs3, Michael J Cima4.   

Abstract

Glial scar formation remains a significant barrier to the long term success of neural probes. Micromotion coupled with mechanical mismatch between the probe and tissue is believed to be a key driver of the inflammatory response. In vitro glial scar models present an intermediate step prior to conventional in vivo histology experiments as they enable cell-device interactions to be tested on a shorter timescale, with the ability to conduct broader biochemical assays. No established in vitro models have incorporated methods to assess device performance with respect to mechanical factors. In this study, we describe an in vitro glial scar model that combines high-precision linear actuators to simulate axial micromotion around neural implants with a 3D primary neural cell culture in a collagen gel. Strain field measurements were conducted to visualize the local displacement within the gel in response to micromotion. Primary brain cell cultures were found to be mechanically responsive to micromotion after one week in culture. Astrocytes, as determined by immunohistochemical staining, were found to have significantly increased in cell areas and perimeters in response to micromotion compared to static control wells. These results demonstrate the importance of micromotion when considering the chronic response to neural implants. Going forward, this model provides advantages over existing in vitro models as it will enable critical mechanical design factors of neural implants to be evaluated prior to in vivo testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28119969      PMCID: PMC5389738          DOI: 10.1039/c6lc01411a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  38 in total

1.  The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull.

Authors:  Roy Biran; Dave C Martin; Patrick A Tresco
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.396

2.  Mechanically-compliant intracortical implants reduce the neuroinflammatory response.

Authors:  Jessica K Nguyen; Daniel J Park; John L Skousen; Allison E Hess-Dunning; Dustin J Tyler; Stuart J Rowan; Christoph Weder; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Hyaluronic acid-based 3D culture model for in vitro testing of electrode biocompatibility.

Authors:  Andrea F Jeffery; Matthew A Churchward; Vivian K Mushahwar; Kathryn G Todd; Anastasia L Elias
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 6.988

4.  The upregulation of specific interleukin (IL) receptor antagonists and paradoxical enhancement of neuronal apoptosis due to electrode induced strain and brain micromotion.

Authors:  Lohitash Karumbaiah; Sharon E Norman; Nithish B Rajan; Sanjay Anand; Tarun Saxena; Martha Betancur; Radhika Patkar; Ravi V Bellamkonda
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Biomechanical analysis of silicon microelectrode-induced strain in the brain.

Authors:  Hyunjung Lee; Ravi V Bellamkonda; Wei Sun; Marc E Levenston
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Dexamethasone treatment reduces astroglia responses to inserted neuroprosthetic devices in rat neocortex.

Authors:  L Spataro; J Dilgen; S Retterer; A J Spence; M Isaacson; J N Turner; W Shain
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  Control protocol for robust in vitro glial scar formation around microwires: essential roles of bFGF and serum in gliosis.

Authors:  Vadim S Polikov; Eric C Su; Matthew A Ball; Jau-Shyong Hong; William M Reichert
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Stab injury and device implantation within the brain results in inversely multiphasic neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative responses.

Authors:  Kelsey A Potter; Amy C Buck; Wade K Self; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Physiologically responsive, mechanically adaptive polymer optical fibers for optogenetics.

Authors:  Mehdi Jorfi; Guy Voirin; E Johan Foster; Christoph Weder
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.776

Review 10.  Mechanical and Biological Interactions of Implants with the Brain and Their Impact on Implant Design.

Authors:  Dimiter Prodanov; Jean Delbeke
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Biomaterial Approaches to Modulate Reactive Astroglial Response.

Authors:  Jonathan M Zuidema; Ryan J Gilbert; Manoj K Gottipati
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.481

Review 2.  Advances in ex vivo models and lab-on-a-chip devices for neural tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sahba Mobini; Young Hye Song; Michaela W McCrary; Christine E Schmidt
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Current advances in in vitro models of central nervous system trauma.

Authors:  Anton Omelchenko; Nisha K Singh; Bonnie L Firestein
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-05-14

4.  A Mechanically-Adaptive Polymer Nanocomposite-Based Intracortical Probe and Package for Chronic Neural Recording.

Authors:  Allison Hess-Dunning; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.891

5.  Silicon-Based Microfabrication of Free-Floating Neural Probes and Insertion Tool for Chronic Applications.

Authors:  Andreas Schander; Heiko Stemmann; Andreas K Kreiter; Walter Lang
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 6.  Tissue Response to Neural Implants: The Use of Model Systems Toward New Design Solutions of Implantable Microelectrodes.

Authors:  Maurizio Gulino; Donghoon Kim; Salvador Pané; Sofia Duque Santos; Ana Paula Pêgo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  In vitro model of the glial scar.

Authors:  Ao Fang; Zhiyan Hao; Ling Wang; Dichen Li; Jiankang He; Lin Gao; Xinggang Mao; Rubén Paz
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2019-07-30

Review 8.  Recent progresses in novel in vitro models of primary neurons: A biomaterial perspective.

Authors:  Jiangang Zhang; Huiyu Yang; Jiaming Wu; Dingyue Zhang; Yu Wang; Jiliang Zhai
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-17

Review 9.  The effects of electrical stimulation on glial cell behaviour.

Authors:  Christopher T Tsui; Preet Lal; Katelyn V R Fox; Matthew A Churchward; Kathryn G Todd
Journal:  BMC Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-09-03

10.  Characterization of Mechanically Matched Hydrogel Coatings to Improve the Biocompatibility of Neural Implants.

Authors:  Kevin C Spencer; Jay C Sy; Khalil B Ramadi; Ann M Graybiel; Robert Langer; Michael J Cima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.