Literature DB >> 28118103

Attention Modifies Spatial Resolution According to Task Demands.

Antoine Barbot1, Marisa Carrasco1,2.   

Abstract

How does visual attention affect spatial resolution? In texture-segmentation tasks, exogenous (involuntary) attention automatically increases resolution at the attended location, which improves performance where resolution is too low (at the periphery) but impairs performance where resolution is already too high (at central locations). Conversely, endogenous (voluntary) attention improves performance at all eccentricities, which suggests a more flexible mechanism. Here, using selective adaptation to spatial frequency, we investigated the mechanism by which endogenous attention benefits performance in resolution tasks. Participants detected a texture target that could appear at several eccentricities. Adapting to high or low spatial frequencies selectively affected performance in a manner consistent with changes in resolution. Moreover, adapting to high, but not low, frequencies mitigated the attentional benefit at central locations where resolution was too high; this shows that attention can improve performance by decreasing resolution. Altogether, our results indicate that endogenous attention benefits performance by modulating the contribution of high-frequency information in order to flexibly adjust spatial resolution according to task demands.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; attention; spatial frequency; spatial resolution; texture segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28118103      PMCID: PMC5555406          DOI: 10.1177/0956797616679634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  43 in total

1.  The locus of attentional effects in texture segmentation.

Authors:  Y Yeshurun; M Carrasco
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Cigdem P Talgar; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

3.  Transient spatial attention degrades temporal resolution.

Authors:  Yaffa Yeshurun; Liat Levy
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-05

4.  Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Florian Pieper; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-13       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Attention changes perceived size of moving visual patterns.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Christian Henrich; Stefan Treue
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Central performance drop on perceptual segregation tasks.

Authors:  L Kehrer
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1989

7.  Human primary visual cortex (V1) is selective for second-order spatial frequency.

Authors:  Luke E Hallum; Michael S Landy; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Enhanced Spatial Resolution During Locomotion and Heightened Attention in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Patrick J Mineault; Elaine Tring; Joshua T Trachtenberg; Dario L Ringach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Attention selects informative neural populations in human V1.

Authors:  Preeti Verghese; Yee-Joon Kim; Alex R Wade
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Improvement of visual acuity by spatial cueing: a comparative study in human and non-human primates.

Authors:  Heidrun Golla; Alla Ignashchenkova; Thomas Haarmeier; Peter Thier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  22 in total

1.  Attention enhances apparent perceptual organization.

Authors:  Antoine Barbot; Sirui Liu; Ruth Kimchi; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

2.  Spatial sampling in human visual cortex is modulated by both spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Daniel Marten van Es; Jan Theeuwes; Tomas Knapen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Attention alters spatial resolution by modulating second-order processing.

Authors:  Michael Jigo; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  In search of exogenous feature-based attention.

Authors:  Ian Donovan; Ying Joey Zhou; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Relative precision of top-down attentional modulations is lower in early visual cortex compared to mid- and high-level visual areas.

Authors:  Sunyoung Park; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Spatial Attention Enhances Crowded Stimulus Encoding Across Modeled Receptive Fields by Increasing Redundancy of Feature Representations.

Authors:  Justin D Theiss; Joel D Bowen; Michael A Silver
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Endogenous spatial attention during perceptual learning facilitates location transfer.

Authors:  Ian Donovan; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  How exogenous spatial attention affects visual representation.

Authors:  Antonio Fernández; Hsin-Hung Li; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Exogenous spatial attention shortens perceived depth.

Authors:  Wanyi Guan; Jiehui Qian
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-08

10.  An image-computable model of how endogenous and exogenous attention differentially alter visual perception.

Authors:  Michael Jigo; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.