Literature DB >> 17997660

Attention changes perceived size of moving visual patterns.

Katharina Anton-Erxleben1, Christian Henrich, Stefan Treue.   

Abstract

Spatial attention shifts receptive fields in monkey extrastriate visual cortex toward the focus of attention (S. Ben Hamed, J. R. Duhamel, F. Bremmer, & W. Graf, 2002; C. E. Connor, J. L. Gallant, D. C. Preddie, & D. C. Van Essen, 1996; C. E. Connor, D. C. Preddie, J. L. Gallant, & D. C. Van Essen, 1997; T. Womelsdorf, K. Anton-Erxleben, F. Pieper, & S. Treue, 2006). This distortion in the retinotopic distribution of receptive fields might cause distortions in spatial perception such as an increase of the perceived size of attended stimuli. Here we test for such an effect in human subjects by measuring the point of subjective equality (PSE) for the perceived size of a neutral and an attended stimulus when drawing automatic attention to one of two spatial locations. We found a significant increase in perceived size of attended stimuli. Depending on the absolute stimulus size, this effect ranged from 4% to 12% and was more pronounced for smaller than for larger stimuli. In our experimental design, an attentional effect on task difficulty or a cue bias might influence the PSE measure. We performed control experiments and indeed found such effects, but they could only account for part of the observed results. Our findings demonstrate that the allocation of transient spatial attention onto a visual stimulus increases its perceived size and additionally biases subjects to select this stimulus for a perceptual judgment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17997660     DOI: 10.1167/7.11.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  37 in total

1.  Equality judgments cannot distinguish between attention effects on appearance and criterion: a reply to Schneider (2011).

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Jared Abrams; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Apparent contrast differs across the vertical meridian: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Stuart Fuller; Ruby Z Rodriguez; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Transient covert attention does alter appearance: a reply to Schneider (2006).

Authors:  Sam Ling; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-08

4.  Where does attention go when it moves? Spatial properties and locus of the attentional repulsion effect.

Authors:  Anna A Kosovicheva; Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Cross-modal attention enhances perceived contrast.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  How Attention Affects Spatial Resolution.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Antoine Barbot
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2015-05-06

8.  Attention enhances contrast appearance via increased input baseline of neural responses.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Cutrone; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Attentional enhancement of spatial resolution: linking behavioural and neurophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Independent effects of adaptation and attention on perceived speed.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Katrin Herrmann; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.